UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2025


☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 001-13777

GETTY REALTY CORP.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Maryland

11-3412575

(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

292 Madison Avenue, 9th Floor

New York, New York 10017-6318

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(646) 349-6000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Not Applicable

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock	GTY	New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer	☒			Accelerated filer	☐

Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐	Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The registrant had outstanding 55,441,949 shares of common stock as of April 24, 2025.

GETTY REALTY CORP.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX


		Page
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	1
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024	1
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025 and 2024	2
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025 and 2024	3
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	4
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	39
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	39

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	40
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	40
Item 5.	Other Information	40
Item 6.	Exhibits	41
Signatures		42

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

GETTY REALTY CORP.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share amounts)


	March 31,			December 31,
	2025			2024
ASSETS:
Real Estate:
Land	$	947,414		$	943,800
Buildings and improvements		1,032,694			1,028,799
Lease intangible assets		170,247			171,129
Investment in direct financing leases, net		42,322			43,416
Construction in progress		83			96
Real estate held for use		2,192,760			2,187,240
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(364,206	)		(350,626	)
Real estate held for use, net		1,828,554			1,836,614
Real estate held for sale, net		200			243
Real estate, net		1,828,754			1,836,857
Notes and mortgages receivable		30,706			29,454
Cash and cash equivalents		6,292			9,484
Restricted cash		4,097			4,133
Deferred rent receivable		63,502			61,553
Accounts receivable		1,990			2,509
Right-of-use assets - operating		11,840			12,368
Right-of-use assets - finance		96			107
Prepaid expenses and other assets		22,358			17,215
Total assets	$	1,969,635		$	1,973,680
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Credit Facility	$	157,500		$	82,500
Term Loan, net		—			148,951
Senior Unsecured Notes, net		748,287			673,511
Environmental remediation obligations		20,593			20,942
Dividends payable		26,853			26,541
Lease liability - operating		13,057			13,612
Lease liability - finance		268			330
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		41,957			45,210
Total liabilities		1,008,515			1,011,597
Commitments and contingencies		—			—
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 20,000,000 authorized; unissued		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 55,441,379 and 55,027,144 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		554			550
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(2,237	)		(1,864	)
Additional paid-in capital		1,099,862			1,088,390
Dividends paid in excess of earnings		(137,059	)		(124,993	)
Total stockholders’ equity		961,120			962,083
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,969,635		$	1,973,680

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GETTY REALTY CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share amounts)


	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025			2024
Revenues:
Revenues from rental properties	$	51,706		$	47,215
Interest on notes and mortgages receivable		624			1,755
Total revenues		52,330			48,970
Operating expenses:
Property costs		1,982			3,703
Impairments		1,169			1,280
Environmental		116			(17	)
General and administrative		6,926			6,656
Depreciation and amortization		16,041			12,652
Total operating expenses		26,234			24,274

Gains on dispositions of real estate		328			1,044

Operating income		26,424			25,740

Other income, net		94			118
Interest expense		(11,732	)		(9,135	)
Net earnings	$	14,786		$	16,723

Basic net earnings per common share:	$	0.25		$	0.30

Diluted net earnings per common share:	$	0.25		$	0.30

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		55,062			53,961
Diluted		55,191			53,969

Comprehensive income:
Net earnings		14,786			16,723

Unrealized (loss) gain on cash flow hedges		(519	)		2,548
Cash flow hedge expense (income) reclassified to interest expense		146			(100	)
Total other comprehensive (loss) income		(373	)		2,448

Comprehensive income	$	14,413		$	19,171

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GETTY REALTY CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)


	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025			2024
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net earnings	$	14,786		$	16,723
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense		16,041			12,652
Impairments		1,169			1,280
Gains on dispositions of real estate		(328	)		(1,044	)
Deferred rent receivable		(1,949	)		(1,546	)
Amortization of intangible market lease assets and liabilities and lease incentives		121			(379	)
Amortization of investment in direct financing leases		1,093			1,606
Amortization of debt issuance costs		1,405			563
Accretion expense		97			124
Stock-based compensation expense		1,613			1,369
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		519			2,248
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(1,744	)		506
Environmental remediation obligations		(1,049	)		(1,361	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(3,097	)		(2,790	)
Net cash flow provided by operating activities		28,677			29,951
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Property acquisitions		(10,012	)		(85,326	)
Capital expenditures		(50	)		(182	)
Addition to construction in progress		14			(430	)
Proceeds from dispositions of real estate		249			1,089
Deposits for property acquisitions		(150	)		3,231
Issuance of notes and mortgages receivable		(1,078	)		(12,713	)
Collection of notes and mortgages receivable		239			57,537
Net cash flow used in investing activities		(10,788	)		(36,794	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Borrowings from Credit Facility		300,000			60,000
Repayments of Credit Facility		(225,000	)		(20,000	)
Proceeds from Senior Unsecured Notes		125,000			—
Repayment of Term Loan		(150,000	)		—
Repayments of Senior Unsecured Notes		(50,000	)		—
Payments of finance lease liability		(62	)		(59	)
Payments of cash dividends		(26,524	)		(24,834	)
Payments of debt issuance costs		(4,337	)		—
Security deposits received (refunded)		(41	)		385
Payments in settlement of restricted stock units		(1,165	)		(890	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net - equity offering		(2	)		(48	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net - ATM Program		11,014			(66	)
Net cash flow (used in) provided by financing activities		(21,117	)		14,488
Change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		(3,228	)		7,645
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period		13,617			5,286
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$	10,389		$	12,931


	Three months ended March 31,
	2025		2024
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	9,887	$	9,621
Income taxes		402		368
Environmental remediation obligations		842		1,066
Non-cash transactions
Dividends declared but not yet paid	$	26,853	$	24,952
Issuance of notes and mortgages receivable related to property dispositions		225		—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1. — DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Getty Realty Corp. (“Getty Realty,” “we,” “us,” “our’ and the “Company”), a Maryland corporation, is a publicly traded, net lease real estate investment trust (“REIT”) specializing in the acquisition, financing and development of convenience, automotive and other single tenant retail real estate. Our predecessor was founded in 1955 and our common stock was listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) in 1997. Unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires, the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” as used herein refer to Getty Realty and its owned and controlled subsidiaries.

Our portfolio includes convenience stores, express tunnel car washes, automotive service centers (gasoline and repair, oil and maintenance, tire and battery, and collision), and certain other freestanding retail properties, including drive-thru quick service restaurants and automotive parts retailers. Our 1,119 properties as of March 31, 2025 are located in 42 states and Washington, D.C., and our tenants operate under a variety of national and regional retail brands. We are internally managed by our management team, which has extensive experience acquiring, financing, developing and managing convenience, automotive and other single tenant retail real estate. Our Company is headquartered in New York, New York.

NOTE 2. — ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Getty Realty and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). We do not distinguish our principal business or our operations on a geographical basis for purposes of measuring performance. We manage and evaluate our operations as a single segment. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Unaudited, Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

The consolidated financial statements are unaudited but, in our opinion, reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods presented. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Use of Estimates, Judgments and Assumptions

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP, which requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and revenues and expenses during the period reported. Estimates, judgments and assumptions underlying the accompanying consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, real estate, receivables, deferred rent receivable, direct financing leases, depreciation and amortization, impairment of long-lived assets, environmental remediation costs, environmental remediation obligations, litigation, accrued liabilities, income taxes and the allocation of the purchase price of properties acquired to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Application of these estimates and assumptions requires exercise of judgment as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

Real Estate

Real estate assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. For acquisitions of real estate, we estimate the fair value of acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, buildings and improvements) “as if vacant” and identified intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of leasehold interests, intangible market lease assets and liabilities, in-place leases and tenant relationships) and assumed debt. Based on these estimates, we allocate the estimated fair value to the applicable assets and liabilities. When we enter into sale-leaseback transactions with intangible market lease assets and liabilities, the intangibles will be accounted for as prepaid rent receivables or prepaid rent liabilities, respectively. Fair value is determined based on an exit price approach, which contemplates the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Assumptions used are property and geographic specific and may include, among other considerations, capitalization rates, market rental rates, rent coverage ratios, and land comparables.

We expense transaction costs associated with business combinations in the period incurred. Acquisitions of real estate which do not meet the definition of a business are accounted for as asset acquisitions. The accounting model for asset acquisitions is similar to the accounting model for business combinations except that the acquisition costs are capitalized and allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed on a relative fair value basis. For additional information regarding property acquisitions, see Note 12 – Property Acquisitions.

We capitalize direct costs, including costs such as construction costs and professional services, and indirect costs associated with the development and construction of real estate assets while substantive activities are ongoing to prepare the assets for their intended use. The capitalization period begins when development activities are underway and ends when it is determined that the asset is substantially complete and ready for its intended use.

We evaluate the held for sale classification of our real estate as of the end of each quarter. Assets that are classified as held for sale are recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

When real estate assets are sold or retired, the cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization is eliminated from the respective accounts and any gain or loss is credited or charged to income. We evaluate real estate sale transactions where we provide seller financing to determine sale and gain recognition in accordance with GAAP. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to income when incurred.

Direct Financing Leases

Income under direct financing leases is included in revenues from rental properties and is recognized over the lease terms using the effective interest rate method which produces a constant periodic rate of return on the net investments in the leased properties. The investments in direct financing leases are increased for interest income earned and amortized over the life of the leases and reduced by the receipt of lease payments. We consider direct financing leases to be past-due or delinquent when a contractually required payment is not remitted in accordance with the provisions of the underlying agreement.

On June 16, 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurements of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). For additional information regarding our direct financing leases, see Note 3 - Leases.

We review our direct financing leases each reporting period to determine whether there were any indicators that the value of our net investments in direct financing leases may be impaired and adjust the allowance for any estimated changes in the credit loss with the resulting change recorded through our consolidated statement of operations. When determining a possible impairment, we take into consideration the collectability of direct financing lease receivables for which a reserve would be required. In addition, we determine whether there has been a permanent decline in the current estimate of the residual value of the property. There were no indicators of impairment related to any of our direct financing leases during the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, and, accordingly, we did not record any additional allowance for credit losses in either period.

When we enter into a contract to sell properties that are recorded as direct financing leases, we evaluate whether we believe that it is probable that the disposition will occur. If we determine that the disposition is probable and therefore the property’s holding period is reduced, we may adjust an allowance for credit losses to reflect the change in the estimate of the undiscounted future rents. Accordingly, the net investment balance is written down to fair value.

Notes and Mortgages Receivable

Notes and mortgages receivable consists of loans originated by us in conjunction with property dispositions and funding provided to tenants in conjunction with property acquisitions and capital improvements. Notes and mortgages receivable are recorded at stated principal amounts. We estimated our credit loss reserve for our notes and mortgages receivable using the weighted average remaining maturity (“WARM”) method, which has been identified as an acceptable loss-rate method for estimating credit loss reserves in the FASB Staff Q&A Topic 326, No. 1. The WARM method requires us to reference historic loan loss data across a comparable data set and apply such loss rate to our notes and mortgages portfolio over its expected remaining term, taking into consideration expected economic conditions over the relevant timeframe. We applied the WARM method for our notes and mortgages portfolio, which share similar risk characteristics. Application of the WARM method to estimate a credit loss reserve requires significant judgment, including (i) the historical loan loss reference data, (ii) the expected timing and amount of loan repayments, and (iii) the current credit quality of our portfolio and our expectations of performance and market conditions over the relevant time period. To estimate the historic loan losses relevant to our portfolio, we used our historical loan performance since the launch of our loan origination business in 2013. As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the allowance for credit losses on notes and mortgages receivable was $0.3 million.

We also originate construction loans and provide development financing for the construction of income-producing properties which we generally expect to acquire via sale-leaseback transactions at the end of the construction period pursuant to purchase options at our election. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, we funded $1.1 million and, as of March 31, 2025, had outstanding $10.6 million of such construction loans and development financing. Our construction loans and development financing generally provide for funding only during the construction period, which is typically nine to twelve months, although we will consider construction periods as long as 24 months. Funds are disbursed based on inspections in accordance with a schedule reflecting the completion of portions of the projects. We also review and inspect each property before disbursement of funds during the term of the construction loan. At the end of the construction period, the construction loans will be repaid with the proceeds from the sale of the properties.

In addition, we may acquire from tenants real estate assets that are under construction and commit to provide additional funding during the construction period to complete the properties. These transactions do not meet the criteria for sale-leaseback accounting and

are accounted for as finance receivables. Accordingly, initial investments and all subsequent fundings made during the construction period are recorded within notes and mortgages receivable on our consolidated balance sheets, and rental payments resulting from these investments are recorded within interest on notes and mortgages receivable on our consolidated statements of operations. At the end of the construction period, we will recognize the purchase of the assets, remove the finance receivables from our consolidated balance sheets, and begin to record rental income from the operating leases. As of March 31, 2025, we had a total of $14.2 million of such investments outstanding and recorded in notes and mortgages receivable.

Revenue Recognition and Deferred Rent Receivable

Lease payments from operating leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the leases. The cumulative difference between lease revenue recognized under this method and the contractual lease payment terms is recorded as deferred rent receivable on our consolidated balance sheets. We review our accounts receivable, including its deferred rent receivable, related to base rents, straight-line rents, tenant reimbursements and other revenues for collectability. Our evaluation of collectability primarily consists of reviewing past due account balances and considers such factors as the credit quality of our tenant, historical trends of the tenant, changes in tenant payment terms, current economic trends, and other facts and circumstances related to the applicable tenants. In addition, with respect to tenants in bankruptcy, we estimate the probable recovery through bankruptcy claims. If a tenant’s accounts receivable balance is considered uncollectible, we will write off the related receivable balances and cease to recognize lease income, including straight-line rent unless cash is received. If the collectability assessment subsequently changes to probable, any difference between the lease income that would have been recognized if collectability had always been assessed as probable and the lease income recognized to date, is recognized as a current-period adjustment to revenues from rental properties. Our reported net earnings are directly affected by our estimate of the collectability of our accounts receivable.

The present value of the difference between the fair market rent and the contractual rent for leases at the time properties are acquired is amortized into revenues from rental properties over the remaining terms of the in-place leases. Lease termination fees are recognized as other income when earned upon the termination of a tenant’s lease and relinquishment of space in which we have no further obligation to the tenant.

The sales of nonfinancial assets, such as real estate, are to be recognized when control of the asset transfers to the buyer, which will occur when the buyer has the ability to direct the use of or obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from the asset. This generally occurs when the transaction closes and consideration is exchanged for control of the property.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Assets are written down to fair value when events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the projected undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of those assets. Assets held for disposal are written down to fair value less estimated disposition costs.

The estimated fair value of real estate is based on the price that would be received from the sale of the property in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In general, we consider multiple internal valuation techniques when measuring the fair value of a property, all of which are based on unobservable inputs and assumptions that are classified within Level 3 of the Fair Value Hierarchy. These assessments have a direct impact on our net income because recording an impairment loss results in an immediate negative adjustment to net income. The evaluation of anticipated cash flows is highly subjective and is based in part on assumptions regarding future rental rates and operating expenses that could differ materially from actual results in future periods. Where properties held for use have been identified as having a potential for sale, additional judgments are required related to the determination as to the appropriate period over which the projected undiscounted cash flows should include the operating cash flows and the amount included as the estimated residual value. This requires significant judgment. In some cases, the results of whether impairment is indicated are sensitive to changes in assumptions input into the estimates, including the holding period until expected sale.

We recorded impairments aggregating $1.2 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, and 2024, respectively. Our estimated fair values, as they relate to property carrying values, were primarily based on estimated sales prices from third-party offers, including signed contracts, letters of intent, or indicative bids (for which we do not have access to the unobservable inputs) used to determine these estimated fair values, and/or consideration of the estimated amount currently required to replace the asset, as adjusted for obsolescence, and resulted in $0.7 million and $0.9 million of impairment charges during the three months ended March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, the remaining impairments of $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively, were due to the accumulation of asset retirement costs as a result of changes in estimates associated with our estimated environmental liabilities which increased the carrying values of certain properties in excess of their fair values. Impairments relating to properties that were previously disposed of by us, included in the amounts above, were $0.2 million for each of the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

All of our financial instruments are reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at amounts which, in our estimation based upon an interpretation of available market information and valuation methodologies, reasonably approximate their fair values, except those separately disclosed in the notes below.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates of fair value that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and revenues and expenses during the period reported using a hierarchy (the “Fair Value Hierarchy”) that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure the fair value. The Fair Value Hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The levels of the Fair Value Hierarchy are as follows: “Level 1” – inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access at the measurement date; “Level 2” – inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly, including inputs in markets that are not considered to be active; and “Level 3” – inputs that are unobservable. Certain types of assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value either on a recurring or non-recurring basis. Assets required or elected to be marked-to-market and reported at fair value every reporting period are valued on a recurring basis. Other assets not required to be recorded at fair value every period may be recorded at fair value if a specific provision or other impairment is recorded within the period to mark the carrying value of the asset to market as of the reporting date. Such assets are valued on a non-recurring basis.

Environmental Remediation Obligations

We record the fair value of an environmental remediation obligation as an asset and liability when there is a legal obligation associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset and the liability can be reasonably estimated. Environmental remediation obligations are estimated based on the level and impact of contamination at each property. The accrued liability is the aggregate of our estimate of the fair value of cost for each component of the liability. The accrued liability is net of estimated recoveries from state underground storage tank (“UST”) remediation funds considering estimated recovery rates developed from prior experience with the funds. Net environmental liabilities are currently measured based on their expected future cash flows which have been adjusted for inflation and discounted to present value. We accrue for environmental liabilities that we believe are allocable to other potentially responsible parties if it becomes probable that the other parties will not pay their environmental remediation obligations. For additional information regarding environmental obligations, see Note 7 – Environmental Obligations.

Income Taxes

We file a federal income tax return on which we consolidate our tax items and the tax items of our subsidiaries that are pass-through entities. Effective January 1, 2001, we elected to qualify, and believe that we are operating so as to qualify, as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on qualifying REIT income, provided that distributions to our stockholders equal at least the amount of our taxable income as defined under the Internal Revenue Code. We accrue for uncertain tax matters when appropriate. The accrual for uncertain tax positions is adjusted as circumstances change and as the uncertainties become more clearly defined, such as when audits are settled or exposures expire. Tax returns for the years 2021, 2022 and 2023, and tax returns which will be filed for the year ended 2024, remain open to examination by federal and state tax jurisdictions under the respective statutes of limitations.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”). ASU 2023-09 requires annual disclosure of specific categories in the income tax rate reconciliation and provides additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold within the rate reconciliation. In addition, the amendments require annual disclosure of income taxes paid disaggregated by federal, state and foreign jurisdictions as well as individual jurisdictions in which income taxes paid is equal to or greater than 5 percent of total income taxes paid. ASU 2023-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024 on a prospective basis, however early adoption and retrospective adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, requiring public entities to disclose additional information about specific expense categories in the notes to the financial statements on an interim and annual basis. ASU 2024-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2024-03.

NOTE 3. — LEASES

As Lessor

As of March 31, 2025, we owned 1,088 properties and leased 31 properties from third-party landlords. These 1,119 properties are located in 42 states across the United States and Washington, D.C. Substantially all of our properties are leased on a triple-net basis to convenience store operators, petroleum distributors, express tunnel car wash operators and other automotive-related and retail tenants. Our tenants either operate their business at our properties directly or, in the case of certain convenience stores and gasoline and repair stations, sublet our properties and supply fuel to third parties that operate the business. Our triple-net lease tenants are responsible for

the payment of all taxes, maintenance, repairs, insurance and other operating expenses relating to our properties, and are also responsible for environmental contamination occurring during the terms of their leases and in certain cases also for environmental contamination that existed before their leases commenced. For additional information regarding our environmental obligations, see Note 7 – Environmental Obligations.

The majority of our tenants’ financial results depend on convenience store sales, the sale of refined petroleum products and/or the sale of automotive services and parts. As a result, our tenants’ financial results can be dependent on the performance of the automobile manufacturing, petroleum marketing and automobile aftermarket industries, each of which are highly competitive and can be subject to variability. During the terms of our leases, we monitor the credit quality of our triple-net lease tenants by reviewing their published credit rating, if available, reviewing publicly available financial statements, or reviewing financial or other operating statements which are delivered to us pursuant to applicable lease agreements, monitoring news reports regarding our tenants and their respective businesses, and monitoring the timeliness of lease payments and the performance of other financial covenants under their leases.

Pursuant to ASU 2016-02, for leases in which we are the lessor, we are (i) retaining classification of our historical leases as we were not required to reassess classification upon adoption of the new standard, (ii) expensing indirect leasing costs in connection with new or extended tenant leases, the recognition of which would have been deferred under prior accounting guidance and (iii) aggregating revenue from our lease components and non-lease components (comprised of tenant reimbursements) into revenue from rental properties.

Revenues from Rental Properties

Revenues from rental properties for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, were $51.7 million and $47.2 million, respectively, including base rental income of $49.6 million and $43.9 million, respectively.

In accordance with GAAP, we recognize rental revenue in amounts which vary from the amount of rent contractually due during the periods presented. As a result, revenues from rental properties include non-cash adjustments recorded for (i) deferred rental revenue due to the recognition of rental income on a straight-line basis over the current lease term, (ii) the net amortization of intangible market lease assets and liabilities, (iii) rental income recorded under direct financing leases using the effective interest method which produces a constant periodic rate of return on the net investments in the leased properties, and (iv) the amortization of deferred lease incentives. Non-cash adjustments included in revenues from rental properties were $0.7 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Tenant reimbursements, which consist of real estate taxes and other municipal charges paid by us and reimbursed by our tenants pursuant to the terms of triple-net lease agreements, were $1.1 million and $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Investment in Direct Financing Leases

The components of investment in direct financing leases, net as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 are as follows (in thousands):


	March 31, 2025			December 31, 2024
Lease payments receivable	$	51,509		$	53,897
Unguaranteed residual value		7,568			7,568
Unearned Income		(16,200	)		(17,494	)
Allowance for credit losses		(555	)		(555	)
Total	$	42,322		$	43,416

In accordance with ASU 2016-13, as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, we had recorded an allowance for credit losses of $0.6 million on investment in direct financing leases.

We evaluate the credit quality of our investment in direct financing leases utilizing internal underwriting and credit analysis. Substantially all of our tenants under direct financing leases are required to provide us with specified unit-level and/or corporate-level financial information. As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, no material balances of our investments in direct financing leases were past due.

Minimum Rents Due

As of March 31, 2025, future contractual annual rentals receivable from our tenants, which have terms in excess of one year are as follows (in thousands):


	Operating Leases		Direct Financing Leases
2025	$	143,183	$	7,266
2026		192,640		9,869
2027		187,413		10,089
2028		178,899		9,799
2029		176,671		8,425
Thereafter		1,283,911		6,061
Total	$	2,162,717	$	51,509

As Lessee

For leases in which we are the lessee, lease accounting standards require leases with durations greater than twelve months to be recognized on our consolidated balance sheets. We elected the package of transition provisions available for expired or existing contracts, which allowed us to carry forward our historical assessments of (i) whether contracts are or contain leases, (ii) lease classification and (iii) initial direct costs.

As of January 1, 2019, we recognized operating lease right-of-use assets of $25.6 million (net of deferred rent expense) and operating lease liabilities of $26.1 million, which were presented on our consolidated financial statements. The right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are carried at the present value of the remaining expected future lease payments. When available, we use the rate implicit in the lease to discount lease payments to present value; however, our current leases did not provide a readily determinable implicit rate. Therefore, we estimated our incremental borrowing rate to discount the lease payments based on information available and considered factors such as interest rates available to us on a fully collateralized basis and terms of the leases. ASU 2016-02 did not have a material impact on our consolidated balance sheets or on our consolidated statements of operations. The most significant impact was the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for operating leases, while our accounting for finance leases remained substantially unchanged.

The following presents the lease-related assets and liabilities (in thousands):


	March 31, 2025
Assets
Right-of-use assets - operating	$	11,840
Right-of-use assets - finance		96
Total lease assets	$	11,936
Liabilities
Lease liability - operating	$	13,057
Lease liability - finance		268
Total lease liabilities	$	13,325

The following presents the weighted average lease terms and discount rates of our leases:


Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):
Operating leases	7.0
Finance leases	2.9
Weighted-average discount rate:
Operating leases (a)		4.67	%
Finance leases		13.50	%

(a)

Upon adoption of the new lease standard, discount rates used for existing leases were established at January 1, 2019.

The following presents our total lease costs (in thousands):


	March 31, 2025
Operating lease cost	$	690
Finance lease cost
Amortization of leased liabilities		62
Interest on lease liabilities		7
Short-term lease cost		—
Total lease cost	$	759

The following presents supplemental cash flow information related to our leases (in thousands):


	March 31, 2025
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows for operating leases	$	718
Operating cash flows for finance leases		7
Financing cash flows for finance leases		62

As of March 31, 2025, scheduled lease liabilities mature as follows (in thousands):


	Operating Leases			Direct Financing Leases
2025	$	2,091		$	146
2026		2,661			148
2027		2,241			-
2028		2,110			—
2029		1,851			—
Thereafter		4,578			—
Total lease payments		15,532			294
Less: amount representing interest		(2,475	)		(26	)
Present value of lease payments	$	13,057		$	268

Major Tenants

As of March 31, 2025 and 2024, we had two significant tenants by revenue:


	March 31, 2025					March 31, 2024
	Number of properties		% of Total Revenues			Number of properties		% of Total Revenues
ARKO Corp. (NASDAQ: ARKO)		148		12	%		150		14	%
Global Partners LP (NYSE: GLP)		128		11	%		150		15	%

Getty Petroleum Marketing Inc.

Getty Petroleum Marketing Inc. (“Marketing”) was our largest tenant from 1997 until 2012 under a unitary triple-net master lease that was terminated in April 2012 as a consequence of Marketing’s bankruptcy, at which time we either sold or re-leased these properties. As of March 31, 2025, 291 of the properties we own or lease were previously leased to Marketing, of which 268 properties are subject to long-term triple-net leases across 11 separate portfolios, and 22 properties are leased as single unit triple-net leases (in addition, one property is vacant). The leases covering properties previously leased to Marketing are unitary triple-net lease agreements generally with an initial term of 15 years and options for successive renewal terms of up to 20 years. As of March 31, 2025, our weighted average remaining lease term, excluding renewal options, for the properties previously leased to Marketing was 6.8 years. Rent is scheduled to increase at varying intervals during both the initial and renewal terms of the leases. Certain of the leases provide for additional rent based on the aggregate volume of fuel sold. In addition, the majority of the leases require the tenants to invest capital in our properties, substantially all of which are related to the replacement of USTs that are owned by our tenants. As of March 31, 2025, we have a remaining commitment to fund up to $4.5 million in the aggregate with our tenants for our portion of such capital improvements. Our commitment provides us with the option to either reimburse our tenants or to offset rent when these capital expenditures are made. This deferred expense is recognized on a straight-line basis as a reduction of rental revenue on our consolidated statements of operations over the life of the various leases.

As part of the triple-net leases for properties previously leased to Marketing, we transferred title of the USTs to our tenants, and the obligation to pay for the retirement and decommissioning or removal of USTs at the end of their useful lives, or earlier if circumstances warranted, was fully or partially transferred to our new tenants. Accordingly, through March 31, 2025, we have removed $13.8 million of asset retirement obligations and $10.8 million of net asset retirement costs related to USTs from our balance sheet. The cumulative change of $0.4 million (net of accumulated amortization of $2.6 million) is recorded as deferred rental revenue and will be recognized on a straight-line basis as additional revenues from rental properties over the terms of the various leases. We remain contingently liable for this obligation in the event that our tenants do not satisfy their responsibilities.

NOTE 4. — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Credit Risk

In order to minimize our exposure to credit risk associated with financial instruments, we place our temporary cash investments, if any, with high credit quality institutions. Temporary cash investments, if any, are currently held in an overnight bank time deposit with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and these balances, at times, may exceed federally insurable limits.

Legal Proceedings

We are involved in various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of our business. As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, we had $0.1 million accrued for certain of these matters which we believe were appropriate based on information then currently available. We are unable to estimate ranges in excess of the amount accrued with any certainty for additional matters. It is possible that our assumptions regarding the ultimate allocation method and share of responsibility that we used to allocate environmental liabilities may change, which may result in our providing an accrual, or adjustments to the amounts recorded, for environmental litigation accruals. Matters related to our former Newark, New Jersey Terminal and the Lower Passaic River, and our methyl tertiary butyl ether (a fuel derived from methanol, commonly referred to as “MTBE”) litigations in the states of Pennsylvania and Maryland, in particular, could cause a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, ability to pay dividends or stock price.

Matters related to our former Newark, New Jersey Terminal and the Lower Passaic River

In 2004, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) issued General Notice Letters (“GNL”) to over 100 entities, including us, alleging that they are potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”) with respect to a 17-mile stretch of the Passaic River from Dundee Dam to the Newark Bay and its tributaries (the Lower Passaic River Study Area or “LPRSA”). The LPRSA is part of the Diamond Alkali Superfund Site (“Superfund Site”) that includes the former Diamond Shamrock Corporation manufacturing facility located at 80-120 Lister Ave. in Newark, New Jersey (the “Diamond Shamrock Facility”), the LPRSA, and the Newark Bay Study Area (i.e, Newark Bay and portions of surrounding rivers and channels). One of the GNL recipients is Occidental Chemical Corporation (“Occidental”), the predecessor to the former owner/operator of the Diamond Shamrock Facility responsible for the discharge of 2,3,8,8-TCDD (“dioxin”) and other hazardous substances. In May 2007, over 70 GNL recipients, including us, entered into an Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent (“AOC”) with the EPA to perform a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (“RI/FS”) for the LPRSA to address investigation and evaluation of alternative remedial actions with respect to alleged damages to the entire 17-mile LPRSA, which the EPA has designated Operable Unit 4 or “OU4”. Many of the parties to the AOC, including us, are also members of a Cooperating Parties Group (“CPG”). In 2015, the CPG submitted a draft RI/FS to the EPA setting forth various alternatives for remediating the LPRSA. In October 2018, the EPA issued a letter directing the CPG to prepare a streamlined feasibility study for just the upper 9-miles of the LPRSA. On December 4, 2020, the CPG submitted a Final Draft Interim Remedy Feasibility Study (“IR/FS”) to the EPA which identified various targeted dredge and cap alternatives for the upper 9-miles of the LPRSA. On September 28, 2021, the EPA issued a Record of Decision (“ROD”) for the upper 9-mile IR/FS (“Upper 9-mile IR ROD”) consisting of dredging and capping to control sediment sources of dioxin and polychlorinated biphenyls at an estimated cost of $441.0 million.

In addition to the RI/FS activities, in June 2012, certain members of the CPG entered into an Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent (“10.9 AOC”) with the EPA to perform certain remediation activities, including removal and capping of sediments at the river mile 10.9 area and certain testing, which remedial work has been completed. Concurrent with the CPG’s work on the RI/FS, on April 11, 2014, the EPA issued a draft Focused Feasibility Study (“FFS”) with proposed remedial alternatives to remediate the lower 8.3-miles of the LPRSA. On March 4, 2016, the EPA issued a ROD for the lower 8.3-miles (“Lower 8-mile ROD”) selecting a remedy that involves bank-to-bank dredging and installing an engineered cap with an estimated cost of $1.38 billion.

On March 31, 2016, the EPA issued a “Notice of Potential Liability and Commencement of Negotiations for Remedial Design” (“Notice”) to more than 100 PRPs, including us, which informed the recipients that the EPA intends to seek an Administrative Order on Consent and Settlement Agreement with Occidental (who the EPA considers the primary contributor of dioxin and other pesticides generated from the production of Agent Orange at its Diamond Shamrock Facility and a discharger of other contaminants of concern (“COCs”) to the Superfund Site) requiring Occidental to prepare the remedial design of the remedy selected in the Lower 8-mile ROD. The EPA has designated the lower 8.3 miles of the LPRSA as Operable Unit 2 or “OU2”, which is geographically subsumed within OU4. On September 30, 2016, Occidental entered into an agreement with the EPA to perform the remedial design for OU2.

By letter dated March 30, 2017, the EPA advised the recipients of the Notice that it would be entering into cash out settlements with certain PRPs who the EPA stated did not discharge any of the eight hazardous substances identified as a COC in the Lower 8-mile ROD to resolve their alleged liability for OU2. Cash out settlements were finalized in 2018 and 2021 with a total of 21 PRPs. The EPA’s March 30, 2017 letter also stated that other parties who did not discharge dioxins, furans or polychlorinated biphenyls (which are considered the COCs posing the greatest risk to the river) may also be eligible for cash out settlements, and that the EPA would begin a process for identifying such other PRPs for negotiation of future cash out settlements and to initiate negotiations with Occidental and other major PRPs for the implementation and funding of the OU2 remedy. In August 2017, the EPA appointed an independent third-party allocation expert to conduct a confidential allocation proceeding that would assign non-binding shares of responsibility to PRPs identified by the EPA for cash out settlements. Most of the PRPs identified by the EPA, including the Company, participated in the allocation process. Occidental did not participate in the allocation proceedings, but on June 30, 2018, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey listing over 120 defendants, including us, seeking cost recovery and contribution under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act for response costs incurred and to be incurred relating to the LPRSA, including the investigation, design, and anticipated implementation of the OU2 remedy (the “Occidental Lawsuit”). We continue to defend the claims asserted in the Occidental Lawsuit individually and in coordination with a group of several other named defendants known as the “Small Parties Group” or “SPG” consistent with our defenses in the related proceedings. On January 5, 2024, the Court entered an Order to Stay the Occidental Lawsuit pending the Court’s adjudication of a Motion to Enter the Modified Consent Decree filed by the United States on January 31, 2024, as discussed below.

The allocator issued a final Allocation Recommendation Report in December 2020, which was based upon an allocation methodology approved by the EPA that contains associated allocation shares for each of the parties invited to participate in the allocation, including Occidental - who the allocator concluded was responsible for more than 99% of the costs to implement the OU2 remedy. As a result of the allocation process, the EPA and 85 parties (the “Settling Parties”), including us, began settlement negotiations and reached an agreement on a cash-out settlement to resolve their alleged liability for the remediation of the entire LPRSA. The EPA concluded that the Settling Parties, individually and collectively, were responsible for only a minor share of the response costs incurred and to be incurred at or in connection with implementing the OU2 and OU4 remedies for the entire 17-mile Lower Passaic River.

In December 2022, the EPA and the Settling Parties finalized their agreement in a proposed consent decree (“CD”), pursuant to which and without admitting liability, the Settling Parties agree to pay the EPA the collective sum of $150.0 million in exchange for contribution protection from claims by non-settling PRPs (including Occidental) for the matters addressed in the CD and the issuance of a notice of completion by the EPA of both the 2007 RI/FS AOC and the 10.9 AOC, upon completion of certain defined tasks in the CD. All 85 Settling Parties contributed to an escrow account agreed upon shares of the settlement amount, which are subject to a confidentiality agreement. Our settlement contribution was in line with legal reserves we had previously established. On December 16, 2022, the United States filed an action in the New Jersey District Court against the Settling Defendants which included lodging of the proposed CD to resolve claims against the Settling Parties for costs associated with cleaning up the LPRSA (the “CD Action”). On December 22, 2022, the EPA published a notice of lodging of the proposed CD in the Federal Register, opening a 45-day public comment period, which was subsequently extended to 90-days. On December 23, 2022, Occidental filed a motion to intervene in the CD Action and subsequently filed voluminous comments objecting to the entry of the proposed CD. On January 17, 2024, the United States informed the Court that it completed reviewing public comments, including those from Occidental, and found no reasons to consider the proposed CD as inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. Nevertheless, the United States decided that certain limited changes to the CD should be made prior to moving for approval thereof. These changes involved removing three parties and a modification to the United States' reservation of rights. The remaining 82 Settling Parties, including us, concurred with these changes, leading to the United States filing a Modified Consent Decree (“Modified CD”) with the Court on the same day, January 17, 2024. On January 31, 2024, the United States filed a copy of all public comments received on the proposed CD, its Response to the public comments and a Motion to Enter the Modified CD. The Motion to Enter the Modified CD and accompanying memorandum of law states that the United States has determined that the proposed settlement is reasonable, fair and consistent with the statutory purpose of CERCLA.

On December 18, 2024, the Court issued an Order and Opinion granting the United States’ Motion to Enter the Modified CD finding the settlement procedurally sound, substantively fair and reasonable, and in furtherance of CERCLA’s goals.

On January 9, 2025, Nokia of America Corporation, an intervening party, filed a Notice of Appeal of the Order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. It is anticipated that Occidental will also file an appeal. The timeline for resolving all appeals to the Third Circuit remains inherently uncertain. Depending on the number of appeals and the time required for briefing and deliberation, a decision by the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit may extend into late 2025 or beyond.

If the Modified CD remains in its currently approved form after the appeals process is exhausted, our alleged liability to the EPA and to any non-settling parties, including Occidental, for the remediation of the entire 17-mile Lower Passaic River and its tributaries will be resolved. If the District Court’s Order is overturned on appeal, then, based on currently known facts and circumstances, including, among other factors, the EPA’s conclusion that we are individually and collectively with numerous other parties only responsible for a minor share of the response costs incurred or to be incurred in connection with the LPRSA, our relative participation in the costs related to the 2007 AOC and 10.9 AOC, our belief that there was not any use or discharge of dioxins, furans or polychlorinated biphenyls in connection with our former petroleum storage operations at our former Newark, New Jersey Terminal, and that there are numerous other parties who will likely bear the costs of remediation and/or damages, we do not believe that resolution of the Lower Passaic River proceedings as relates to us is reasonably likely to have a material impact on our results of operations. Nevertheless, if the District

Court’s Order is overturned or is not ultimately approved in its current form, performance of the EPA’s selected remedies for the LPRSA may be subject to future negotiation, potential enforcement proceedings and/or possible litigation and, on this basis, our ultimate liability in the proceedings pertaining to the LPRSA remains uncertain and subject to contingencies which cannot be predicted and an outcome which is not yet known. We previously transferred funds to an escrow account based on our share of the settlement contemplated by the Modified CD, however it is possible that circumstances may change and losses related to the Lower Passaic River proceedings could exceed the amounts we have funded.

MTBE Litigation – State of Pennsylvania

On July 7, 2014, our subsidiary, Getty Properties Corp., was served with a complaint filed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (the “State”) in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County relating to alleged statewide MTBE contamination in Pennsylvania. The named plaintiff is the State, by and through (then) Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane (as Trustee of the waters of the State), the Pennsylvania Insurance Department (which governs and administers the Underground Storage Tank Indemnification Fund), the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (vested with the authority to protect the environment) and the Pennsylvania Underground Storage Tank Indemnification Fund. The complaint names us and more than 50 other petroleum refiners, manufacturers, transporters, distributors and retailers of MTBE or gasoline containing MTBE who are alleged to have manufactured, distributed, stored and sold MTBE gasoline in Pennsylvania. The complaint seeks compensation for natural resource damages and for injuries sustained as a result of “defendants’ unfair and deceptive trade practices and act in the marketing of MTBE and gasoline containing MTBE.” The plaintiffs also seek to recover costs paid or incurred by the State to detect, treat and remediate MTBE from public and private water wells and groundwater. The plaintiffs assert causes of action against all defendants based on multiple theories, including strict liability – defective design; strict liability – failure to warn; public nuisance; negligence; trespass; and violation of consumer protection law.

The case was filed in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, but was removed by defendants to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and then transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York so that it may be managed as part of the ongoing MTBE MDL proceedings. In November 2015, plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint naming additional defendants and adding factual allegations against the defendants. We joined with other defendants in the filing of a motion to dismiss the claims against us, which was granted in part and denied in part.

The discovery phase of the litigation has concluded, and the parties are engaged in summary judgment motion practice before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, following which additional pretrial motion practice is anticipated. Once all pretrial motions are concluded, the case is expected to be remanded to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for trial. Multiple defendants in the case have settled with plaintiff. We continue to vigorously defend the claims made against us. Our ultimate liability in this proceeding is uncertain and subject to numerous contingencies, the outcome of which are not yet known.

MTBE Litigation – State of Maryland

On December 17, 2017, the State of Maryland, by and through the Attorney General on behalf of the Maryland Department of Environment and the Maryland Department of Health (the “State of Maryland”), filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City related to alleged statewide MTBE contamination in Maryland. The complaint was served upon us on January 19, 2018. The complaint names us and more than 60 other defendants. The complaint seeks compensation for natural resource damages and for injuries sustained as a result of the defendants’ unfair and deceptive trade practices in the marketing of MTBE and gasoline containing MTBE. The plaintiffs also seek to recover costs paid or incurred by the State of Maryland to detect, investigate, treat and remediate MTBE from public and private water wells and groundwater, punitive damages and the award of attorneys’ fees and litigation costs. The plaintiffs assert causes of action against all defendants based on multiple theories, including strict liability – defective design; strict liability – failure to warn; strict liability for abnormally dangerous activity; public nuisance; negligence; trespass; and violations of Titles 4, 7 and 9 of the Maryland Environmental Code.

On February 14, 2018, defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. We are vigorously defending the claims made against us. Our ultimate liability, if any, in this proceeding is uncertain and subject to numerous contingencies the outcome of which are not yet known.

NOTE 5. — DEBT

The amounts outstanding under our Credit Facility and our Senior Unsecured Notes are as follows ($ in thousands):



	Maturity Date	Interest Rate	March 31, 2025			December 31, 2024
Credit Facility (a)	January 2029	6.11%	$	157,500		$	82,500
Term Loan	October 2025	6.13%		—			150,000
Series C Note	February 2025	4.75%		—			50,000
Series D-E Notes	June 2028	5.47%		100,000			100,000
Series F-H, R Notes	September 2029	4.09%		175,000			125,000
Series I-K Notes	November 2030	3.43%		175,000			175,000
Series L-N, S-T Notes	February 2032	4.41%		175,000			100,000
Series O-Q Notes	January 2033	3.65%		125,000			125,000
Total debt				907,500			907,500
Unamortized debt issuance costs, net (b)				(6,090	)		(3,158	)
Total debt, net			$	901,410		$	904,342

(a)

Amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility include $150.0 million subject to interest rate swaps that fixed SOFR at a weighted average of 4.73% over a maximum period ending October 2026. Including the impact of the swaps, the effective interest rate for $150.0 million borrowings was 6.13% based on our consolidated total indebtedness.

(b)

Unamortized debt issuance costs related to the Credit Facility were $4.4 million and $0.6 million as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively, and are included in prepaid expenses and other assets on our consolidated balance sheets.

Credit Facility

In January 2025, we entered into a third amended and restated credit agreement (as amended, the “Third Restated Credit Agreement”). The Third Restated Credit Agreement provides for an unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) in an aggregate principal amount of $450.0 million and includes an accordion feature to increase the revolving commitments or add one or more tranches of term loans up to an additional aggregate amount not to exceed $300.0 million, subject to certain conditions, including one or more new or existing lenders agreeing to provide commitments for such increased amount and that no default or event of default shall have occurred and be continuing under the terms of the Credit Facility.

The Credit Facility matures in January 2029, subject to two six-month extensions (for a total of 12 months) exercisable at our option. Our exercise of an extension option is subject to the absence of any default and our compliance with certain conditions, including the payment of extension fees to the lenders under the Credit Facility.

Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at a rate equal to (i) the sum of a SOFR rate plus a SOFR adjustment of 0.10% plus a margin of 1.30% to 1.90%, or (ii) the sum of a base rate plus a margin of 0.30% to 0.90%, in each case with the margin based on our consolidated total indebtedness to total asset value ratio at the end of each quarterly reporting period.

The per annum rate of the unused line fee on the undrawn funds under the Credit Facility is 0.15% to 0.25% based on our daily unused portion of the available Credit Facility.

Term Loan

In October 2023, we entered into a term loan credit agreement (the “Term Loan Agreement”) that provided for a senior unsecured term loan (the "Term Loan") in an aggregate principal amount of $150.0 million. The Term Loan was to mature in October 2025, subject to one twelve-month extension exercisable at our option.

In January 2025, we used borrowings under the Third Restated Credit Agreement to repay, in full, the Term Loan. As a result of this early repayment, we recognized approximately $0.9 million in unamortized debt issuance costs, which were expensed as interest expense on our consolidated statements of operations.

Senior Unsecured Notes

Guaranteed Senior Notes due June 21, 2028 (the “Series D Notes”), (ii) $50.0 million of 3.52% Series F Guaranteed Senior Notes due September 12, 2029 (the “Series F Notes”), (iii) $100.0 million of 3.43% Series I Guaranteed Senior Notes due November 25, 2030 (the “Series I Notes”) and (iv) $80.0 million of 3.765% Series Q Guaranteed Senior Notes due January 20, 2033 (the “Series Q Notes”), remain outstanding under the Seventh Amended and Restated Prudential Agreement.

In November 2024, we entered into an amended and restated note purchase and guarantee agreement with New York Life Insurance Company and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “New York Life”) (the “Amended and Restated New York Life Agreement”) pursuant to which, in February 2025, we issued $50.0 million of 5.52% Series R Guaranteed Senior Notes due September 12, 2029 (the “Series R Notes”) and $25.0 million of 5.70% Series S Guaranteed Senior Notes due February 22, 2032 (the “Series S Notes”) to New York Life. The other senior unsecured notes outstanding as of March 31, 2025 under our note purchase and guarantee agreement with New York Life (the “New York Life Agreement”), including (i) $25.0 million of 3.45% Series N Guaranteed Senior Notes due February 22, 2032 (the “Series N Notes”) and (ii) $25.0 million of 3.65% Series P Guaranteed Senior Notes due January 20, 2033 (the “Series P Notes”), remain outstanding under the Amended and Restated New York Life Agreement.

In February 2022, we entered into a second amended and restated note purchase and guarantee agreement with American General Life Insurance Company and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “AIG”) (the “Second Amended and Restated AIG Agreement”) pursuant to which we issued $55.0 million of 3.45% Series L Guaranteed Senior Notes due February 22, 2032 (the “Series L Notes”) to AIG. The other senior unsecured notes outstanding as of March 31, 2025 under our first amended and restated note purchase and guarantee agreement with AIG (the “First Amended and Restated AIG Agreement”), including (i) $50.0 million of 3.52% Series G Guaranteed Senior Notes due September 12, 2029 (the “Series G Notes”) and (ii) $50.0 million of 3.43% Series J Guaranteed Senior Notes due November 25, 2030 (the “Series J Notes”), remain outstanding under the Second Amended and Restated AIG Agreement.

In February 2022, we entered into a second amended and restated note purchase and guarantee agreement with Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “MassMutual”) (the “Second Amended and Restated MassMutual Agreement”) pursuant to which we issued $20.0 million of 3.45% Series M Guaranteed Senior Notes due February 22, 2032 (the “Series M Notes”) and, in January 2023, $20.0 million of 3.65% Series O Guaranteed Senior Notes due January 20, 2033 (the “Series O Notes”) to MassMutual. The other senior unsecured notes outstanding as of March 31, 2025 under our first amended and restated note purchase and guarantee agreement with MassMutual (the “First Amended and Restated MassMutual Agreement”), including (i) $25.0 million of 3.52% Series H Guaranteed Senior Notes due September 12, 2029 (the “Series H Notes”) and (ii) $25.0 million of 3.43% Series K Guaranteed Senior Notes due November 25, 2030 (the “Series K Notes”), remain outstanding under the Second Amended and Restated MassMutual Agreement.

In June, 2018, we entered into a note purchase and guarantee agreement with MetLife and certain of its affiliates (collectively, "MetLife") (the “MetLife Agreement”) pursuant to which we issued $50.0 million of 5.47% Series E Guaranteed Senior Notes due June 21, 2028 (the “Series E Notes”) to MetLife.

The funded and outstanding Series D Notes, Series E Notes, Series F Note, Series G Notes, Series H Notes, Series I Notes, Series J Notes, Series K Notes, Series L Notes, Series M Notes, Series N Notes, Series O Notes, Series P Notes, Series Q Notes, Series R Notes, Series S Notes and Series T Notes are collectively referred to as the "Senior Unsecured Notes".

Covenants

The Third Restated Credit Agreement and Senior Unsecured Notes contain customary financial covenants such as leverage, coverage ratios and minimum tangible net worth, as well as limitations on restricted payments, which may limit our ability to incur additional debt or pay dividends. The Third Restated Credit Agreement and Senior Unsecured Notes also contain customary events of default, including cross defaults to each other, change of control and failure to maintain REIT status (provided that the Senior Unsecured Notes require a mandatory offer to prepay the notes upon a change in control in lieu of a change of control event of default). Any event of default, if not cured or waived in a timely manner, would increase by 200 basis points (2.00%) the interest rate we pay under the Third Restated Credit Agreement and Senior Unsecured Notes, and could result in the acceleration of our indebtedness outstanding under the Credit Facility and Senior Unsecured Notes. We may be prohibited from drawing funds under the Credit Facility if there is any event or condition that constitutes an event of default under the Second Restated Credit Agreement or that, with the giving of any notice, the passage of time, or both, would be an event of default under the Second Restated Credit Agreement.

As of March 31, 2025, we were in compliance with all of the material terms of the Third Restated Credit Agreement and Senior Unsecured Notes, including the various financial covenants described herein.

Debt Maturities

As of March 31, 2025, scheduled debt maturities, including balloon payments, are as follows (in thousands):


	Credit Facility		Senior Unsecured Notes		Total
2025	$	—	$	—	$	—
2026		—		—		—
2027		—		—		—
2028		—		100,000		100,000
2029 (a)		157,500		175,000		332,500
Thereafter		—		475,000		475,000
Total	$	157,500	$	750,000	$	907,500

(a)

The Credit Facility matures in January 2029. Subject to the terms of the Third Restated Credit Agreement and our continued compliance with its provisions, we have the option to extend the term for two six-month periods (for a total of 12 months).

NOTE 6. — DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

We enter into derivative instruments for risk management purposes only, including derivatives designated as hedging instruments as required by FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and those utilized as economic hedges. Our use of derivative instruments is currently limited to interest rate hedges. We do not enter into derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes, where changes in the cash flows of the derivative are not expected to offset changes in cash flows of the hedged item. All derivatives are recognized on our consolidated balance sheets at fair value. For those derivative instruments for which we intend to elect hedge accounting, at the time the derivative contract is entered into, we document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking the various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets or to specific forecasted transactions. We also formally assess, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of hedged items.

To the extent our derivatives are effective in offsetting the variability of the hedged cash flows, and otherwise meet the cash flow hedge accounting criteria in accordance with GAAP, changes in the derivatives’ fair value are not included in current earnings, but are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). These changes in fair value will be reclassified into earnings at the time of the forecasted transaction. Ineffectiveness measured in the hedging relationship is recorded in earnings in the period in which it occurs.

In October 2023, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge against changes in future cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates on $75.0 million of outstanding variable-rate borrowings over a maximum period ending October 2026. Also, in October 2023, we entered into forward-starting interest rate swap agreements to hedge against changes in interest rates from the trade date through the projected issuance date of $75.0 million of additional variable-rate borrowings, and to hedge against changes in future cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates on the additional $75.0 million of variable-rate borrowings over a maximum period ending October 2026. During the next twelve months, we estimate that $1.2 million will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest expense.

The following table summarizes the notional amount at inception and fair value of these instruments on our consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 ($ in thousands):


									Fair Value of Liability
									March 31,			December 31,
Product	Fixed Rate			Notional		Index	Effective Date	Maturity Date	2025			2024
Swap		4.80	%	$	75,000	Daily Simple SOFR + 10 bps	10/17/2023	10/19/2026	$	(1,198	)	$	(1,024	)
Swap		4.66	%		75,000	Daily Simple SOFR + 10 bps	4/10/2024	10/19/2026		(1,039	)		(840	)

The following table presents amounts recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to derivative and hedging activities for the periods presented (in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025			2024
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income	$	(373	)		$	2,448

NOTE 7. — ENVIRONMENTAL OBLIGATIONS

We are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations, including matters relating to the protection of the environment such as the remediation of known contamination and the retirement and decommissioning or removal of long-lived assets including buildings containing hazardous materials, USTs and other equipment. Environmental costs are principally attributable to remediation costs which are incurred for, among other things, removing USTs, excavation of contaminated soil and water, installing, operating, maintaining and decommissioning remediation systems, monitoring contamination and governmental agency compliance reporting required in connection with contaminated properties.

We enter into leases and various other agreements which contractually allocate responsibility between the parties for known and unknown environmental liabilities at or relating to the subject properties. Under applicable law, we are contingently liable for these environmental obligations in the event that our tenant does not satisfy them, and we are required to accrue for environmental liabilities that we believe are allocable to others under our leases if we determine that it is probable that our tenant will not meet its environmental obligations. It is possible that our assumptions regarding the ultimate allocation method and share of responsibility that we used to allocate environmental liabilities may change, which may result in material adjustments to the amounts recorded for environmental litigation accruals and environmental remediation liabilities. We assess whether to accrue for environmental liabilities based upon relevant factors including our tenants’ histories of paying for such obligations, our assessment of their financial capability, and their intent to pay for such obligations. However, there can be no assurance that our assessments are correct or that our tenants who have paid their obligations in the past will continue to do so. We may ultimately be responsible to pay for environmental liabilities as the property owner if our tenant fails to pay them.

The estimated future costs for known environmental remediation requirements are accrued when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The accrued liability is the aggregate of our estimate of the fair value of cost for each component of the liability, net of estimated recoveries from state UST remediation funds considering estimated recovery rates developed from prior experience with the funds.

For substantially all of our triple-net leases, our tenants are contractually responsible for compliance with environmental laws and regulations, removal of USTs at the end of their lease term (the cost of which is mainly the responsibility of our tenant, but in certain cases partially paid for by us) and remediation of any environmental contamination that arises during the term of their tenancy. Our tenants are also responsible for pre-existing environmental contamination that is discovered during their lease term, except contamination that was known at lease commencement, as to which we have established reserves.

For the subset of our triple-net leases which cover properties previously leased to Marketing (substantially all of which commenced in 2012), the allocation of responsibility differs from our other triple-net leases as it relates to preexisting known and unknown contamination. Under the terms of our leases covering properties previously leased to Marketing, we agreed to be responsible for environmental contamination that was known at the time the lease commenced, and for unknown environmental contamination which existed prior to commencement of the lease and which is discovered (other than as a result of a voluntary site investigation) during the first 10 years of the lease term (or a shorter period for a minority of such leases) (a “Lookback Period”). After expiration of the applicable Lookback Period, responsibility for all newly discovered contamination at these properties, even if it relates to periods prior to commencement of the lease or sale, is the contractual responsibility of our tenant or buyer as the case may be.

Based on the expiration of the Lookback Periods, together with other factors which have significantly mitigated our potential liability for preexisting environmental obligations, including the absence of any contractual obligations relating to properties which have been sold, quantifiable trends associated with types and ages of USTs at issue, expectations regarding future UST replacements, and historical trends and expectations regarding discovery of preexisting unknown environmental contamination and/or attempted pursuit of us therefore, we concluded that there is no material continued risk of having to satisfy contractual obligations relating to preexisting unknown environmental contamination at certain properties. Accordingly, as of March 31, 2025, we had removed $24.2 million of unknown reserve liabilities which had previously been accrued for these properties. There were no removals of unknown reserve liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

We continue to anticipate that our tenants under leases where the Lookback Periods have expired will replace USTs in the years ahead as these USTs near the end of their expected useful lives. At many of these properties the USTs in use were fabricated with older generation materials and technologies and we believe it is prudent to expect that upon their removal preexisting unknown environmental contamination will be identified. Although contractually these tenants are now responsible for preexisting unknown environmental contamination that is discovered during UST replacements, because the applicable Lookback Periods have expired before the end of the initial term of these leases, together with other relevant factors, we believe there remains continued risk that we will be responsible for remediation of preexisting environmental contamination associated with future UST removals at certain properties. Accordingly, we believe it is appropriate at this time to maintain $11.8 million of unknown reserve liabilities for certain properties with respect to which the Lookback Periods have expired as of March 31, 2025.

estimates are based primarily upon quantifiable trends which we believe allow us to make reasonable estimates of fair value for the future costs of environmental remediation resulting from the anticipated removal and replacement of USTs. Our accrual of this liability represents our estimate of the fair value of the cost for each component of the liability, net of estimated recoveries from state UST remediation funds considering estimated recovery rates developed from prior experience. In arriving at our accrual, we analyzed the ages and expected useful lives of USTs at properties where we would be responsible for preexisting unknown environmental contamination and we projected a cost to closure for remediation of such contamination.

We measure our environmental remediation liabilities at fair value based on expected future net cash flows, adjusted for inflation and then discount them to present value. We adjust our environmental remediation liabilities quarterly to reflect changes in projected expenditures, changes in present value due to the passage of time and reductions in estimated liabilities as a result of actual expenditures incurred during each quarter. As of March 31, 2025, we had accrued a total of $20.6 million for our prospective environmental remediation obligations. This accrual consisted of (a) $8.8 million, which was our estimate of reasonably estimable environmental remediation liability, including obligations to remove USTs for which we are responsible, net of estimated recoveries and (b) $11.8 million for future environmental liabilities related to preexisting unknown contamination. As of December 31, 2024, we had accrued a total of $20.9 million for our prospective environmental remediation obligations. This accrual consisted of (a) $9.1 million, which was our estimate of reasonably estimable environmental remediation liability, including obligations to remove USTs for which we are responsible, net of estimated recoveries and (b) $11.8 million for future environmental liabilities related to preexisting unknown contamination.

Environmental liabilities are accreted for the change in present value due to the passage of time and, accordingly, $0.1 million of net accretion expense was recorded for each of the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 and included in environmental expenses. In addition, during the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, we recorded credits to environmental expenses aggregating $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, where decreases in estimated remediation costs exceeded the depreciated carrying value of previously capitalized asset retirement costs. For the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, changes in environmental estimates aggregating $35 thousand and $37 thousand, respectively, were related to properties that were previously disposed of by us. Environmental expenses also include project management fees, legal fees, and environmental litigation accruals.

During each of the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, we increased the carrying values of certain of our properties by $0.6 million due to changes in estimated environmental remediation costs. The recognition and subsequent changes in estimates in environmental liabilities and the increase or decrease in carrying values of the properties are non-cash transactions which do not appear on our consolidated statements of cash flows.

Capitalized asset retirement costs are being depreciated over the estimated remaining life of the UST, a 10-year period if the increase in carrying value is related to environmental remediation obligations or such shorter period if circumstances warrant, such as the remaining lease term for properties we lease from others. Depreciation and amortization expense related to capitalized asset retirement costs on our consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, were $0.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Capitalized asset retirement costs were $33.1 million (consisting of $25.0 million of known environmental liabilities and $8.1 million of reserves for future environmental liabilities) as of March 31, 2025, and $33.2 million (consisting of $25.0 million of known environmental liabilities and $8.2 million of reserves for future environmental liabilities) as of December 31, 2024. We recorded impairment charges aggregating $0.5 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, for capitalized asset retirement costs.

In July 2012, we purchased a 10-year pollution legal liability insurance policy covering substantially all of our properties at that time for discovery of preexisting unknown environmental liabilities and for new environmental events. The policy had a $50.0 million aggregate limit and was subject to various self-insured retentions and other conditions and limitations. This policy expired in July 2022, although claims made prior to such expiration remain subject to coverage. In September 2022, we purchased a 5-year pollution legal liability insurance policy to cover a subset of our properties which we believe present the greatest risk for discovery of preexisting unknown environmental liabilities and for new environmental events. The policy has a $25.0 million in aggregate limit and is subject to various self-insured retentions and other conditions and limitations. Our intention in purchasing this policy was to obtain protection for certain properties which we believe have the greatest risk of significant environmental events.

In light of the uncertainties associated with environmental expenditure contingencies, we are unable to estimate ranges in excess of the amount accrued with any certainty; however, we believe that it is possible that the fair value of future actual net expenditures could be substantially higher than amounts currently recorded by us. Adjustments to accrued liabilities for environmental remediation obligations will be reflected on our consolidated financial statements as they become probable and a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made.

NOTE 8. — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

A summary of the changes in stockholders’ equity for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 is as follows (in thousands except per share amounts):


	Common Stock				Accumulated Other Comprehensive			Additional Paid-in			Dividends Paid in Excess
	Shares		Amount		Income (loss)			Capital			of Earnings			Total
Balance, December 31, 2024		55,027	$	550	$	(1,864	)	$	1,088,390		$	(124,993	)	$	962,083
Net earnings		—		—		—			—			14,786			14,786
Accumulated other comprehensive income		—		—		(373	)		—			—			(373	)
Dividends declared — $0.47 per share		—		—		—			—			(26,852	)		(26,852	)
Shares issued pursuant to ATM Program, net		407		4		—			11,008			—			11,012
Shares issued pursuant to dividend reinvestment		—		—		—			16			—			16
Stock-based compensation and settlements		7		—		—			448			—			448
Balance, March 31, 2025		55,441	$	554	$	(2,237	)	$	1,099,862		$	(137,059	)	$	961,120

Balance, December 31, 2023		53,953	$	540		(4,021	)	$	1,053,129		$	(94,096	)	$	955,552
Net earnings												16,723			16,723
Accumulated other comprehensive income		—		—		2,448			—			—			2,448
Dividends declared — $0.45 per share		—		—		—			—			(24,952	)		(24,952	)
Shares issued pursuant to equity offering, net		—		—		—			(48	)		—			(48	)
Shares issued pursuant to ATM Program, net		—		—		—			(66	)		—			(66	)
Shares issued pursuant to dividend reinvestment		—		—		—			15			—			15
Stock-based compensation and settlements		14		—		—			480			—			480
Balance, March 31, 2024		53,967	$	540	$	(1,573	)	$	1,053,510		$	(102,325	)	$	950,152

On March 1, 2025, our Board of Directors granted 293,605 restricted stock units (“RSU” or “RSUs”), under our Amended and Restated 2004 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. On March 1, 2024, our Board of Directors granted 271,250 RSUs under our Amended and Restated 2004 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan.

Equity Offering

In July 2024, we completed a follow-on public offering of 4.0 million shares of common stock in connection with forward sales agreements. We expect to settle the forward sales agreements, typically within 12 months, via physical delivery of the outstanding shares of common stock in exchange for gross cash proceeds of approximately $121.2 million.

ATM Program

In February 2023, we established and, in February 2024, we amended, an at-the-market equity offering program (the “ATM Program”), pursuant to which we are able to issue and sell shares of our common stock with an aggregate sales price of up to $350.0 million through a consortium of banks acting as our sales agents or acting as forward sellers on behalf of any forward purchasers pursuant to forward sales agreements. Sales of the shares of common stock may be made, as needed, from time to time in at-the-market offerings as defined in Rule 415 of the Securities Act, including by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions on the New York Stock Exchange or otherwise at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to prevailing market prices or as otherwise agreed to with the applicable agent.

The use of forward sales agreements allow us to lock in a share price on the sale of shares at the time the forward sales agreements become effective, but defer receiving the proceeds from the sale of shares until a later date. To account for the forward sales agreements, we considered the accounting guidance governing financial instruments and derivatives. To date, we have concluded that our forward sales agreements are not liabilities as they do not embody obligations to repurchase our shares nor do they embody obligations to issue a variable number of shares for which the monetary value are predominantly fixed, varying with something other than the fair value of the shares, or varying inversely in relation to our shares.

We also evaluated whether the forward sales agreements meet the derivatives and hedging guidance scope exception to be accounted for as equity instruments. We concluded that the forward sales agreements are classifiable as equity contracts based on the following assessments: (i) none of the agreements’ exercise contingencies that are based on observable markets or indices besides those related to the market for our own stock price and operations, and (ii) none of the settlement provisions precluded the agreements from being indexed to our own stock.

We also consider the potential dilution resulting from the forward sales agreements on our earnings per share calculations. We use the treasury stock method to determine the dilution resulting from the forward sales agreements during the period of time prior to settlement.

ATM Direct Issuances

During the three months ended March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024, no shares of common stock were issued under the ATM Program. Future sales, if any, will depend on a variety of factors to be determined by us from time to time, including among others, market conditions, the trading price of our common stock, determinations by us of the appropriate sources of funding for us and potential uses of funding available to us.

ATM Forward Agreements

During the three months ended March 31, 2025, we settled 406,727 shares and realized net proceeds of $11.0 million after deducting fees and expenses and making certain other adjustments as provided in the equity distribution agreement. We expect to settle outstanding forward sales agreements, typically within 12 months of the respective agreement dates, via physical delivery of the outstanding shares of common stock in exchange for cash proceeds, although we may elect cash settlement or net share settlement for all or a portion of our obligations under the forward sales agreements, subject to certain conditions.

The following table summarizes activity under our ATM Program in connection with forward sales agreements for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
Period Entered Into Forward Sales Agreements	Shares Sold		Shares Settled		Shares Remaining		Net Proceeds Received		Anticipated Gross Proceeds Remaining
Three Months Ended June 30, 2024		406,727		406,727		—	$	11,014	$	—
Three Months Ended December 31, 2024		992,696		—		992,696		—		32,277
Total		1,399,423		406,727		992,696	$	11,014	$	32,277


	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2024
Period Entered Into Forward Sales Agreements	Shares Sold		Shares Settled		Shares Remaining		Net Proceeds Received		Anticipated Gross Proceeds Remaining
Three Months Ended June 30, 2023		217,561		—		217,561	$	—	$	7,609
Three Months Ended December 31, 2023		831,489		—		831,489		—		24,561
Total		1,049,050		—		1,049,050	$	—	$	32,170

Dividends

For the three months ended March 31, 2025, we paid regular quarterly dividends of $26.5 million or $0.47 per share. For the three months ended March 31, 2024, we paid regular quarterly dividends of $24.8 million or $0.45 per share.

Dividend Reinvestment Plan

Our dividend reinvestment plan provides our common stockholders with a convenient and economical method of acquiring additional shares of common stock by reinvesting all or a portion of their dividend distributions. During the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, we issued 553 and 532 shares of common stock, respectively, under the dividend reinvestment plan and received proceeds of approximately $16 thousand and $15 thousand, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation expense using the fair value method was $1.6 million and $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expense on our consolidated statements of operations.

NOTE 9. — EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic and diluted earnings per common share gives effect, utilizing the two-class method, to the potential dilution from the issuance of shares of our common stock in settlement of RSUs which provide for non-forfeitable dividend equivalents equal to the dividends declared per common share. Basic and diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net earnings less dividend equivalents attributable to RSUs by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.

The following table is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share using the two-class method (in thousands except per share data):


	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025			2024
Net earnings	$	14,786		$	16,723
Less dividend equivalents attributable to RSUs outstanding		(795	)		(667	)
Net earnings attributable to common stockholders used in basic and diluted earnings per share calculation	$	13,991		$	16,056
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		55,062			53,961
Incremental shares from stock-based compensation		38			8
Incremental shares from Equity Offering forward agreements		80			—
Incremental shares from ATM Program forward agreements		11			—
Diluted		55,191			53,969
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.25		$	0.30
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.25		$	0.30

NOTE 10. — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Debt Instruments

As of March 31, 2025 and at December 31, 2024, the carrying value of the borrowings under the Credit Facility approximated fair value. As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the fair value of the borrowings under our Senior Unsecured Notes was $685.1 million and $601.6 million, respectively. The fair value of the borrowings outstanding as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 was determined using a discounted cash flow technique that incorporates a market interest yield curve with adjustments for duration, risk profile and borrowings outstanding, which are based on unobservable inputs within Level 3 of the Fair Value Hierarchy.

Derivative Instruments

We use interest rate swap agreements to manage our interest rate risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis of the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves. As of March 31, 2025, we had assessed the overall valuation of our derivative positions and determined that derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the Fair Value Hierarchy. The fair value of these liability instruments was $2.2 million and is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, net on our consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2025.

Supplemental Retirement Plan

We have mutual fund assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 1 inputs. We have a Supplemental Retirement Plan for executives. The amounts held in trust under the Supplemental Retirement Plan using Level 2 inputs may be used to satisfy claims of general creditors in the event of our or any of our subsidiaries’ bankruptcy. We have liability to the executives participating in the Supplemental Retirement Plan for the participant account balances equal to the aggregate of the amount invested at the executives’ direction and the income earned in such mutual funds.

The following summarizes as of March 31, 2025, our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the Fair Value Hierarchy (in thousands):


	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Mutual funds	$	2,033	$	—	$	—	$	2,033
Liabilities:
Deferred compensation	$	—	$	2,033	$	—	$	2,033

The following summarizes as of December 31, 2024, our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the Fair Value Hierarchy (in thousands):


	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Mutual funds	$	1,853	$	—	$	—	$	1,853
Liabilities:
Deferred compensation	$	—	$	1,853	$	—	$	1,853

Real Estate Assets

We have certain real estate assets that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis using Level 3 inputs as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, of $1.4 million and $2.0 million, where impairment charges have been recorded. Due to the subjectivity inherent in the internal valuation techniques used in estimating fair value, the amounts realized from the sale of such assets may vary significantly from these estimates.

NOTE 11. — ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

Real estate held for sale consisted of the following as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 (in thousands):


	March 31,			December 31,
	2025			2024
Land	$	93		$	133
Buildings and improvements		118			164
		211			297
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(11	)		(54	)
Real estate held for sale, net	$	200		$	243

During the three months ended March 31, 2025, we sold two properties resulting in an aggregate gain of $0.3 million which is included in gains on dispositions of real estate on our consolidated statements of operations. We also received funds from property condemnations resulting in a loss of $15 thousand which is included in gains on dispositions of real estate on our consolidated statements of operations.

NOTE 12. — PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS

2025

During the three months ended March 31, 2025, we acquired interests in five properties for an aggregate purchase price of $10.0 million (including amounts funded in prior periods) as follows ($ in thousands):


					Purchase Price Allocation
Asset Type	Properties		Purchase Price		Land		Buildings & Improve- ments		In-Place Leases		Intangible Market Lease Assets		Intangible Market Lease Liabilities
Express tunnel car washes		1	$	4,074	$	845	$	2,822	$	407	$	—	$	—
Auto service centers (a)		1		1,450		1,450		—		—		—		—
Drive-thru QSRs		3		4,488		1,582		2,422		484		—		—
Total		5	$	10,012	$	3,877	$	5,244	$	891	$	—	$	—

(a)

Includes one property that was acquired for the construction of a new-to-industry auto service center by our tenant and for which we committed to provide additional funding to complete the development of the property. All subsequent fundings made during the construction period will be recorded within notes and mortgages receivable on our consolidated balance sheets, and rental payments resulting from these investments will be recorded within interest on notes and mortgages receivable on our consolidated statements of operations. At the end of the construction period, we will recognize the purchase of the constructed assets, remove the finance receivables from our consolidated balance sheets, and begin to record rental income from the operating lease.

2024

During the three months ended March 31, 2024, we acquired interests in 22 properties for an aggregate purchase price of $85.3 million (including amounts funded in prior periods) as follows ($ in thousands):


					Purchase Price Allocation
Asset Type	Properties		Purchase Price		Land		Buildings & Improve- ments		In-Place Leases		Intangible Market Lease Assets		Intangible Market Lease Liabilities
Express tunnel car washes (a)		12	$	61,011	$	13,262	$	41,869	$	6,386	$	—	$	(506	)
Convenience stores		1		7,592		2,496		4,394		702		—		—
Auto service centers		7		13,677		3,205		6,675		1,661		2,136		—
Drive-thru QSRs		2		3,046		523		2,050		473		—		—
Total		22	$	85,326	$	19,486	$	54,988	$	9,222	$	2,136	$	(506	)

(a)

Includes six properties that were acquired during the year ended December 31, 2023 while under construction and accounted for as finance receivables as they did not meet the criteria for sale-leaseback accounting. Accordingly, the initial investment and all subsequent fundings made during the construction periods were recorded within notes and mortgages receivable on our consolidated balance sheets, and rental payments resulting from these investments were recorded within interest on notes and mortgages receivable on our consolidated statements of operations. During the three months ended March 31, 2024, at the end of their respective construction periods, we recognized the purchase of the assets, removed the finance receivables from our consolidated balance sheets, and began to record rental income from the operating leases. These acquisitions also included provisions that require us, upon the achievement by the tenant of certain financial performance targets within a defined period, to pay additional amounts to the tenant. Whether we will have to make any payments under these provisions is not probable or reasonably estimable at this time.

NOTE 13. — SEGMENT REPORTING

We are a net lease REIT specializing in the acquisition, financing and development of convenience, automotive and other single tenant retail real estate. Substantially all of our properties are leased on a triple-net basis to convenience store operators, petroleum distributors, express tunnel car wash operators, and other automotive-related and retail tenants. Our Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM"), which is our Chief Executive Officer, does not distinguish or group operations based on geography, size, type or other basis when assessing the financial performance of our properties. Our operating properties have similar economic characteristics and provide similar products and services to consumers. Accordingly, we manage and evaluate our operations as a single reportable segment based on our consolidated financial statements for financial reporting and disclosure purposes.

The CODM is responsible for overseeing our operations and making key strategic decisions, including the allocation of resources, evaluating financial performance, and determining the overall direction of our Company. The CODM receives consolidated financial and operational data to assess performance and make these decisions. Our measure of segment profit or loss is net earnings. The CODM also reviews significant expenses associated with the Company’s single reportable segment which are presented on our consolidated statements of operations.

The CODM reviews net earnings and the relevant components thereof that are directly reflected on our consolidated statements of operations. The CODM is also regularly provided the reportable segment level asset information, real estate held for use, which is directly reflected on our consolidated balance sheets. Refer to the descriptions below for further details:

•

Net earnings: this metric represents the total profit after accounting for all revenues, expenses and other costs. It reflects our overall financial performance and profitability. Net earnings used by our CODM to identify underlying trends in the performance of our business and make comparisons with the financial performance of our competitors. Net earnings are reported on our consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.

•

Revenue from rental properties: a component of net earnings, this balance represents the total income derived from long-term, triple-net leases with tenants. It is the primary source of revenue for us and reflects the effectiveness of our real estate portfolio in generating rental income. Revenue from rental properties is reported in the revenue section on our consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.

•

Total operating expenses: a component of net earnings, operating expenses include all costs related to the maintenance and management of the properties, including property costs and general and administrative expenses. These expenses are critical to maintaining the portfolio’s long-term profitability and are disclosed under the operating expenses section on our consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive Income.

•

Real estate held for use: this total represents the value of properties that we actively use to generate rental income. It is a core asset-based metric and a key driver of our long-term growth. Managing real estate held for use is essential for value appreciation and strategic portfolio management, which enables us to make informed decisions regarding acquisitions, divestitures, and overall asset allocation to support sustainable growth and are disclosed in the real estate section on our consolidated balance sheets.

NOTE 14. — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In preparing our unaudited consolidated financial statements, we have evaluated events and transactions occurring after March 31, 2025, for recognition or disclosure purposes. Based on this evaluation, there were no significant subsequent events from March 31, 2025, through the date the financial statements were issued.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024; and “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws that are subject to the safe harbor created under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Statements preceded by, followed by, or that otherwise include the words “believes,” “expects,” “seeks,” “plans,” “projects,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “predicts” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” “may” and “could” are generally forward-looking in nature and are not historical facts. All capitalized and undefined terms used in this section shall have the same meanings hereafter defined in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Examples of forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include, but are not limited to, our statements regarding:

•

our network of convenience stores, express tunnel car washes, automotive service centers, and certain other freestanding retail properties, including drive-thru quick service restaurants and automotive parts retailers;

•

our investment strategy and its impact on our financial performance;

•

changes in market conditions affecting our tenants and their financial stability and creditworthiness, which would impact their compliance with lease obligations;

•

concentration of certain tenants in similar industries or concentration of our owned and leased properties in certain geographic locations;

•

the amount of revenue we expect to realize from our properties, including renewal of existing leases, sale, acquisition or redevelopment opportunities;

•

our belief that our real estate assets are not carried at amounts in excess of their estimated net realizable fair value amounts;

•

compliance of our properties with federal, state, and local provisions enacted or adopted pertaining to environmental matters;

•

our ability to maintain our federal tax status as a REIT, effects of U.S. federal tax reform and other legislative, regulatory, and administrative developments;

•

our competitive position in our industry, including the impact of existing legislation and regulations;

•

the cost and potential outcomes of current and future environmental and litigation matters, including those resulting from preexisting unknown environmental contamination and matters related to our former Newark, New Jersey Terminal and the Lower Passaic River, our MTBE multi-district litigation cases in the states of Pennsylvania and Maryland, and related accruals, estimates, and assumptions regarding our liabilities, remediation costs and expected recoveries;

•

impact of global political and economic uncertainties, including changes in tariff policies and trade relationships, geopolitical conflicts, and public health crises, and their potential effects on our operations, tenant performance, and financial condition;

•

our ability to adequately secure our information technology systems and the regulated data stored therein, as required by law;

•

the adequacy of our insurance coverage and that of our tenants on our owned and leased properties;

•

our ability to attract and retain key management personnel;

•

our workplace demographics, recruiting efforts, and employee compensation program;

•

our use of FFO and AFFO as measures that represent our core operating performance and its utility in comparing our core operating performance between periods;

•

the reasonableness of our estimates, judgments, projections, and assumptions used regarding our accounting policies and methods;

•

our ability to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting;

•

our indemnification obligations and the indemnification obligations of others;

•

the adequacy of our current and anticipated cash flows from operations, borrowings under our Credit Facility, and available cash and cash equivalents to fund our future operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements;

•

our continued compliance with the covenants in our credit and notes agreements;

•

our ability to pay dividends and changes to our dividend policy; and

•

our dependence on external sources of capital, timing of and need for additional financing and dilution as a result of future issuances of equity securities.

These forward-looking statements are based on our current beliefs and assumptions and information currently available to us, and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors including, but not limited to, the risks described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as such risk factors may be updated from time to time in our public filings. Such risks and uncertainties were derived based on numerous important assumptions, which may not be realized, and may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Most of these factors are difficult to predict accurately and are generally beyond our control. New risk factors and uncertainties may also emerge from time to time, and there can be no assurance that we have identified all risks and uncertainties that may affect it.

As a result of these and other factors, we may experience material fluctuations in future operating results on a quarterly or annual basis, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results, our growth or reinvestment strategies, our ability to pay dividends or stock price. An investment in our stock involves various risks, including those mentioned above and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and those that are described from time to time in our other filings with the SEC.

You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our view only as of the date hereof. Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information under the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements, to report events or to report the occurrence of unanticipated events, unless required by law.

General

Real Estate Investment Trust

We are a net lease REIT specializing in the acquisition, financing and development of convenience, automotive and other single tenant retail real estate. Our portfolio is comprised of convenience stores, express tunnel car washes, automotive service centers (gasoline and repair, oil and maintenance, tire and battery, and collision), and certain other freestanding retail properties, including drive-thru quick service restaurants and automotive parts retailers. As of March 31, 2025, our portfolio included 1,119 properties, including 1,088 properties owned by us and 31 properties that we leased from third-party landlords. As a REIT, we are not subject to federal corporate income tax on the taxable income we distribute to our stockholders. In order to continue to qualify for taxation as a REIT, we are required, among other things, to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income to our stockholders each year.

Our Properties

Our 1,119 properties are located in 42 states and Washington D.C. and include a concentration in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions that we believe is unique and not readily available for purchase or lease from other owners or landlords. Our typical property consists of approximately one acre of land in a larger metropolitan area and is used as a convenience store, express tunnel car wash, automotive service center, or certain other freestanding retail uses, including drive-thru quick service restaurants and automotive parts retailers. Many of our properties are located at highly trafficked urban intersections or conveniently close to highway entrances or exit ramps.

As of March 31, 2025, we leased 1,115 of our properties to tenants under triple-net leases, including 912 properties leased under 51 separate unitary or master triple-net leases, and 203 properties leased under single unit triple-net leases. These leases generally provide for an initial term of 15 or 20 years, with options for successive renewal terms of up to 20 years, and periodic rent escalations. As of March 31, 2025, our weighted average remaining lease term, excluding renewal options, was 10.0 years.

Substantially all of our properties are leased on triple-net basis to convenience store operators, petroleum distributors, express tunnel car wash operators and other automotive-related and retail tenants. Our tenants either operate their business at our properties directly or, in the case of certain convenience stores and gasoline and repair stations, sublet our properties and supply fuel to third parties that operate the businesses. For additional information regarding risks related to our tenants’ dependence on the performance of the industry, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Operations—Significant number of our tenants depend on the same industry for their revenues” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Our triple-net lease tenants are responsible for the payment of all taxes, maintenance, repairs, insurance and other operating expenses relating to our properties, and are also responsible for environmental contamination occurring during the terms of their leases. Substantially all of our tenants are also responsible for pre-existing environmental contamination that is discovered during their lease term, except contamination that was known at lease commencement, as to which we have established reserves. For additional information regarding our environmental obligations, see Note 7 – Environmental Obligations.

As of March 31, 2025, we also had three properties vacant and one property under redevelopment.

Investment Strategy and Activity

As part of our strategy to grow and diversify our portfolio, we regularly review acquisition and financing opportunities to invest in additional convenience, automotive and other single tenant retail real estate. We primarily pursue sale leaseback transactions with existing and prospective tenants and will also provide forward commitments to acquire new-to-industry construction and acquire assets with in-place leases. Our investment activities may also include purchase money financing with respect to properties we sell, real property loans relating to our leasehold properties, and construction loans or other financing for the development of new-to-industry properties. Our investment strategy seeks to generate current income and benefit from long-term appreciation in the underlying value of our real estate. To achieve that goal, we seek to invest in well-located, freestanding properties that support automobility and provide convenience and service to consumers in major markets across the country. A key element of our investment strategy is to invest in properties that will enhance our property type, tenant, and geographic diversification.

During the three months ended March 31, 2025, we invested $11.1 million across six properties, including the acquisition of three drive-thru quick service restaurants, one express tunnel car wash and one auto service center.

During the three months ended March 31, 2024, we invested $40.6 million (net of amounts funded in prior periods) across 35 properties, including the acquisition 12 express tunnel car washes, seven auto service centers, two drive-thru quick service restaurants, and one convenience store.

Redevelopment Strategy and Activity

We believe that certain of our properties, primarily those currently being used as gas and repair businesses, are well-suited to be redeveloped as modern convenience stores or other single tenant convenience and automotive retail uses, such as automotive parts retailers, quick service restaurants, auto service centers, and bank branches. We believe that the redeveloped properties can be leased or sold at higher values than their prior use. Since the inception of our redevelopment program in 2015, we have completed 32 redevelopment and revenue-enhancing capital expenditure projects.

As of March 31, 2025, we had one property under active redevelopment and others in various stages of feasibility planning for potential recapture from our net lease portfolio.

Supplemental Non-GAAP Measures

We manage our business to enhance the value of our real estate portfolio and, as a REIT, place particular emphasis on minimizing risk, to the extent feasible, and generating cash sufficient to make required distributions to stockholders of at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income each year. In addition to measurements defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), we also focus on Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and Adjusted Funds From Operations (“AFFO”) to measure our performance.

FFO and AFFO are generally considered by analysts and investors to be appropriate supplemental non-GAAP measures of the performance of REITs. FFO and AFFO are not in accordance with, or a substitute for, measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, FFO and AFFO are not based on any comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles. Neither FFO nor AFFO represent cash generated from operating activities calculated in accordance with GAAP and therefore these measures should not be considered an alternative for GAAP net earnings or as a measure of liquidity. These measures should only be used to evaluate our performance in conjunction with corresponding GAAP measures.

FFO is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) as GAAP net earnings before (i) depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, (ii) gains or losses on dispositions of real estate assets, (iii) impairment charges, and (iv) the cumulative effect of accounting changes.

We define AFFO as FFO excluding (i) certain revenue recognition adjustments (defined below), (ii) certain environmental adjustments (defined below), (iii) stock-based compensation, (iv) amortization of debt issuance costs and (v) other non-cash and/or unusual items that are not reflective of our core operating performance.

Other REITs may use definitions of FFO and/or AFFO that are different than ours and, accordingly, may not be comparable.

We believe that FFO and AFFO are helpful to analysts and investors in measuring our performance because both FFO and AFFO exclude various items included in GAAP net earnings that do not relate to, or are not indicative of, the core operating performance of our portfolio. Specifically, FFO excludes items such as depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, gains or losses on dispositions of real estate assets, and impairment charges. With respect to AFFO, we further exclude the impact of (i) deferred rental revenue (straight-line rent), the net amortization of intangible market lease assets and liabilities, adjustments recorded for the recognition of rental income from direct financing leases, and the amortization of deferred lease incentives (collectively, “Revenue Recognition Adjustments”), (ii) environmental accretion expenses, environmental litigation accruals, insurance reimbursements, legal settlements and judgments, and changes in environmental remediation estimates (collectively, “Environmental Adjustments”), (iii) stock-based compensation expense, (iv) amortization of debt issuance costs and (v) other items, which may include allowances for credit losses on notes and mortgages receivable and direct financing leases, losses on extinguishment of debt, retirement and severance costs, and other items that do not impact our recurring cash flow and which are not indicative of our core operating performance.

We pay particular attention to AFFO which we believe provides the most useful depiction of the core operating performance of our portfolio. By providing AFFO, we believe we are presenting information that assists analysts and investors in their assessment of our core operating performance, as well as the sustainability of our core operating performance with the sustainability of the core operating performance of other real estate companies.

A reconciliation of net earnings to FFO and AFFO is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025			2024
Net earnings	$	14,786		$	16,723
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets		16,041			12,652
Gains on dispositions of real estate		(328	)		(1,044	)
Impairments		1,169			1,280
Funds from operations (FFO)		31,668			29,611
Revenue recognition adjustments
Deferred rental revenue (straight-line rent)		(1,949	)		(1,546	)
Amortization of intangible market lease assets and liabilities, net		(81	)		(126	)
Amortization of investment in direct financing leases		1,093			1,606
Amortization of lease incentives		202			(253	)
Total revenue recognition adjustments		(735	)		(319	)
Environmental Adjustments
Accretion expense		97			124
Changes in environmental estimates		(208	)		(295	)
Environmental litigation accruals		—			—
Insurance reimbursements		(43	)		(65	)
Legal settlements and judgments		—			(41	)
Total environmental adjustments		(154	)		(277	)
Other Adjustments
Stock-based compensation expense		1,613			1,369
Amortization of debt issuance costs		1,405			563
Retirement and severance costs		—			456
Total other adjustments		3,018			2,388
Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO)	$	33,797		$	31,403

Basic per share amounts:
Net earnings	$	0.25		$	0.30
FFO (a)		0.56			0.53
AFFO (a)		0.60			0.57
Diluted per share amounts:
Net earnings	$	0.25		$	0.30
FFO (a)		0.56			0.53
AFFO (a)		0.59			0.57
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		55,062			53,961
Diluted		55,191			53,969

(a)

Dividends paid and undistributed earnings allocated, if any, to unvested restricted stockholders are deducted from FFO and AFFO for the computation of the per share amounts. The following amounts were deducted:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025		2024
FFO	$	944	$	792
AFFO		1,008		839

Results of Operations

Three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024

The following table presents select data and comparative results from our consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2025, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024 (in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025		2024			$ Change
Revenues:
Revenues from rental properties	$	51,706	$	47,215		$	4,491
Interest on notes and mortgages receivable		624		1,755			(1,131	)

Operating expenses:
Property costs		1,982		3,703			(1,721	)
Impairments		1,169		1,280			(111	)
Environmental		116		(17	)		133
General and administrative		6,926		6,656			270
Depreciation and amortization		16,041		12,652			3,389

Other items:
Gains on dispositions of real estate		328		1,044			(716	)
Interest expense		11,732		9,135			2,597

Revenues from Rental Properties

The following table presents the results for revenues from rental properties for the three months ended March 31, 2025, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024 (in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025		2024		$ Change
Rental income	$	49,863	$	44,056	$	5,807
Revenue recognition adjustments		735		319		416
Tenant reimbursement income		1,108		2,840		(1,732	)
Total revenues from rental properties		51,706		47,215		4,491

Rental income includes base rental income and additional rental income, if any, based on the aggregate volume of fuel sold at certain properties. The increase in rental income was primarily due to additional base rental income from properties acquired during the prior 12 months, as well as rent commencements from completed redevelopments and contractual rent increases for certain in-place leases, partially offset by dispositions of real estate during the same period.

In accordance with GAAP, we recognize revenues from rental properties in amounts which vary from the amount of rent contractually due during the periods presented. As a result, revenues from rental properties include revenue recognition adjustments comprised of (i) non-cash adjustments recorded for deferred rental revenue due to the recognition of rental income on a straight-line basis over the current lease term, (ii) the net amortization of intangible market lease assets and liabilities, (iii) recognition of rental income under direct financing leases using the effective interest rate method which produces a constant periodic rate of return on the net investments in the leased properties, and (iv) the amortization of deferred lease incentives.

Tenant reimbursements consist of real estate taxes and other municipal charges paid by us which are reimbursable by our tenants pursuant to the terms of triple-net lease agreements. The decrease in tenant reimbursement income was driven by a decrease in reimbursable real estate taxes due from our tenants as we transitioned certain tenants to paying real estate taxes due directly to the applicable taxing authorities.

Interest on Notes and Mortgages Receivable

The decrease in interest on notes and mortgages receivable was due to a decrease in average notes and mortgages receivables outstanding as collections of notes and mortgages receivable for completed development funding projects offset incremental development funding advances for the construction of new-to-industry properties.

Property Costs

The following table presents the results for property costs for the three months ended March 31, 2025, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024 (in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025		2024		$ Change
Property operating expenses	$	1,824	$	3,639	$	(1,815	)
Leasing and redevelopment expenses		158		64		94
Total property costs		1,982		3,703		(1,721	)

Property costs are comprised of (i) property operating expenses, including rent expense, reimbursable and non-reimbursable real estate taxes and municipal charges, certain state and local taxes, and maintenance expenses, and (ii) leasing and redevelopment expenses, including professional fees, demolition costs, and redevelopment project cost write-offs, if any.

The decrease in property operating expenses was primarily due to a decrease in reimbursable real estate taxes as we transitioned certain tenants to paying real estate taxes directly to the applicable taxing authorities, as well as lower rent expense. The increase in leasing and redevelopment expenses was primarily due to an increase in professional fees related to leasing activities for potential redevelopment projects.

Impairments

Impairments are recorded when the carrying value of a property is reduced to fair value. Impairment charges for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 were attributable to the addition of asset retirement costs to certain properties due to changes in estimates associated with our environmental liabilities, which increased the carrying values of these properties in excess of their fair values. Impairment charges for the three months ended March 31, 2025 also included reductions in the carrying value of certain properties based on third-party indications of potential selling prices.

Environmental Expenses

The change in environmental expenses was primarily due to higher legal fees and changes in environmental estimates. Environmental expenses vary from period to period and, accordingly, undue reliance should not be placed on the magnitude or the direction of change in reported environmental expenses for one period, as compared to prior periods.

General and Administrative Expenses

The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to increases in employee-related expenses, professional fees, and certain deal pursuit costs, partially offset by decreases in non-recurring retirement and severance costs and information technology expenses.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

The increase in depreciation and amortization expenses was primarily due to additional depreciation and amortization from properties acquired during the prior 12 months, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation charges related to asset retirement costs, the effect of certain assets becoming fully depreciated, lease terminations, and dispositions of real estate during the same period.

Gains on Dispositions of Real Estate

The gains on dispositions of real estate were primarily due to the disposition of two properties during the three months ended March 31, 2025 and one property during the three months ended March 31, 2024.

Interest Expense

The increase in interest expense was due to higher average borrowings and higher average interest rates during the three months ended March 31, 2025, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

Our primary uses of liquidity include payments of operating expenses, interest on our outstanding debt, environmental remediation costs, distributions to shareholders, and future acquisitions and redevelopment projects. We have not historically incurred significant capital expenditures other than those related to acquisitions.

We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through cash flow from operations, funds available under our Credit Facility, proceeds from Senior Unsecured Notes, proceeds from the settlement of shares of common stock subject to forward sales agreements under our Equity Offering and ATM Program, and available cash and cash equivalents.

As of March 31, 2025, we had $292.5 million of availability under our Credit Facility, 5.0 million shares of common stock subject to forward sales agreements which are anticipated to generate approximately $153.4 million of gross proceeds upon settlement, and available cash and cash equivalents of $6.3 million.

We anticipate meeting our longer-term capital needs through cash flow from operations, funds available under our Credit Facility, available cash and cash equivalents, the future issuance of shares of common stock or debt securities, and proceeds from future real estate asset sales.

Our cash flow activities for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, are summarized as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025			2024			$ Change
Net cash flow provided by operating activities	$	28,677		$	29,951		$	(1,274	)
Net cash flow used in investing activities		(10,788	)		(36,794	)		26,006
Net cash flow (used in) provided by financing activities		(21,117	)		14,488			(35,605	)

Operating Activities

The change in net cash flow provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 was primarily the result of changes in revenues and expenses as discussed in “Results of Operations” above and the other changes in assets and liabilities on our consolidated statements of cash flows.

Investing Activities

The decrease in net cash flow used in investing activities was primarily due to a $75.3 million decrease in property acquisitions and an $11.6 million decrease in issuance of notes and mortgages receivable, partially offset by a $57.3 million decrease in collections of notes and mortgages receivable.

Financing Activities

The increase in net cash flow used in financing activities was primarily due to the repayments of our $150.0 million Term Loan and $50.0 million Series C Notes, partially offset by the issuance of $125.0 million of new Senior Unsecured Notes, an increase of $35.0 million in net borrowings under the Credit Facility, and an increase in net proceeds from the issuance of common stock under the ATM Program of $11.1 million.

Credit Facility

The per annum rate of the unused line fee on the undrawn funds under the Credit Facility is 0.15% to 0.25% based on our daily unused portion of the available Credit Facility.

Term Loan

Senior Unsecured Notes

In November 2024, we entered into a seventh amended and restated note purchase and guarantee agreement with The Prudential Insurance Company of America and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Prudential”) (the "Seventh Amended and Restated Prudential Agreement") pursuant to which, in February 2025, we issued $50.0 million of 5.70% Series T Guaranteed Senior Notes due February 22, 2032 (the “Series T Notes”) to Prudential and used the proceeds to repay the $50.0 million of 4.75% Series C Guaranteed Senior Notes due February 25, 2025 (the “Series C Notes”) outstanding under our sixth amended and restated note purchase and guarantee agreement with Prudential (the "Sixth Amended and Restated Prudential Agreement"). The other senior unsecured notes outstanding as of March 31, 2025 under the Sixth Amended and Restated Prudential Agreement, including (i) $50.0 million of 5.47% Series D Guaranteed Senior Notes due June 21, 2028 (the “Series D Notes”), (ii) $50.0 million of 3.52% Series F Guaranteed Senior Notes due September 12, 2029 (the “Series F Notes”), (iii) $100.0 million of 3.43% Series I Guaranteed Senior Notes due November 25, 2030 (the “Series I Notes”) and (iv) $80.0 million of 3.765% Series Q Guaranteed Senior Notes due January 20, 2033 (the “Series Q Notes”), remain outstanding under the Seventh Amended and Restated Prudential Agreement.

Debt Maturities

The amounts outstanding under our Credit Facility, Term Loan, and Senior Unsecured Notes, exclusive of extension options, are as follows ($ in thousands):



	Maturity Date	Interest Rate	March 31, 2025			December 31, 2024
Credit Facility (a)	January 2029	6.11%	$	157,500		$	82,500
Term Loan	October 2025	6.13%		—			150,000
Series C Note	February 2025	4.75%		—			50,000
Series D-E Notes	June 2028	5.47%		100,000			100,000
Series F-H, R Notes	September 2029	4.09%		175,000			125,000
Series I-K Notes	November 2030	3.43%		175,000			175,000
Series L-N, S-T Notes	February 2032	4.41%		175,000			100,000
Series O-Q Notes	January 2033	3.65%		125,000			125,000
Total debt				907,500			907,500
Unamortized debt issuance costs, net (b)				(6,090	)		(3,158	)
Total debt, net			$	901,410		$	904,342

(a)

(b)

Equity Offering

ATM Program

ATM Direct Issuances

ATM Forward Agreements

During the three months ended March 31, 2025 we settled 406,727 shares and realized net proceeds of $11.0 million after deducting fees and expenses and making certain other adjustments as provided in the equity distribution agreement. We expect to settle outstanding forward sales agreements, typically within 12 months of the respective agreement dates, via physical delivery of the outstanding shares of common stock in exchange for cash proceeds, although we may elect cash settlement or net share settlement for all or a portion of our obligations under the forward sales agreements, subject to certain conditions.

The following table summarizes activity under our ATM Program in connection with forward sales agreements for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
Period Entered Into Forward Sales Agreements	Shares Sold		Shares Settled		Shares Remaining		Net Proceeds Received		Anticipated Gross Proceeds Remaining
Three Months Ended June 30, 2024		406,727		406,727		—	$	11,014	$	—
Three Months Ended December 31, 2024		992,696		—		992,696		—		32,277
Total		1,399,423		406,727		992,696	$	11,014	$	32,277


	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2024
Period Entered Into Forward Sales Agreements	Shares Sold		Shares Settled		Shares Remaining		Net Proceeds Received		Anticipated Gross Proceeds Remaining
Three Months Ended June 30, 2023		217,561		—		217,561	$	—	$	7,609
Three Months Ended December 31, 2023		831,489		—		831,489		—		24,561
Total		1,049,050		—		1,049,050	$	—	$	32,170

Dividends

We elected to be treated as a REIT under the federal income tax laws with the year beginning January 1, 2001. To qualify for taxation as a REIT, we must, among other requirements such as those related to the composition of our assets and gross income, distribute annually to our stockholders at least 90% of our taxable income, including taxable income that is accrued by us without a corresponding receipt of cash.

It is also possible that instead of distributing 100% of our taxable income on an annual basis, we may decide to retain a portion of our taxable income and to pay taxes on such amounts as permitted by the Internal Revenue Service. Payment of dividends is subject to market conditions, our financial condition, including but not limited to, our continued compliance with the provisions of the Third Restated Credit Agreement, our Senior Unsecured Notes and other factors, and therefore is not assured. In particular, the Third Restated Credit Agreement and our Senior Unsecured Notes prohibit the payment of dividends during certain events of default.

Regular quarterly dividends paid to our stockholders for the three months ended March 31, 2025 were $26.5 million, or $0.47 per share. There can be no assurance that we will continue to pay dividends at historical rates.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have been prepared in conformity with GAAP. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported on our consolidated financial statements. Although we have made estimates, judgments and assumptions regarding future uncertainties relating to the information included on our consolidated financial statements, giving due consideration to the accounting policies selected and materiality, actual results could differ from these estimates, judgments and assumptions and such differences could be material.

Estimates, judgments and assumptions underlying the accompanying consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, real estate, receivables, deferred rent receivable, direct financing leases, depreciation and amortization, impairment of long-lived assets, environmental remediation obligations, litigation, accrued liabilities, income taxes and the allocation of the purchase price of properties acquired to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The information included on our consolidated financial statements that is based on estimates, judgments and assumptions is subject to significant change and is adjusted as circumstances change and as the uncertainties become more clearly defined.

Our accounting policies are described in Note 1 in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. The SEC’s Financial Reporting Release (“FRR”) No. 60, Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies (“FRR 60”), suggests that companies provide additional disclosure on those accounting policies considered most critical. FRR 60 considers an accounting policy to be critical if it is important to our financial condition and results of operations and requires significant judgment and estimates on the part of management in its application. We believe that our most critical accounting policies relate to revenue recognition and deferred rent receivable, direct financing leases, impairment of long-lived assets, environmental remediation obligations, litigation, income taxes, and the allocation of the purchase price of properties acquired to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (collectively, our “Critical Accounting Policies”), each of which is discussed in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Environmental Matters

General

For substantially all of our triple-net leases, our tenants are contractually responsible for compliance with environmental laws and regulations, removal of USTs at the end of their lease term (the cost of which is mainly the responsibility of our tenant but in certain cases partially paid for by us) and remediation of any environmental contamination that arises during the term of their tenancy. Our tenants are also responsible for their pre-existing environmental contamination that is discovered during their lease term, except contamination that was known at lease commencement, as to which we have established reserves.

been sold, quantifiable trends associated with types and ages of USTs at issue, expectations regarding future UST replacements, and historical trends and expectations regarding discovery of preexisting unknown environmental contamination and/or attempted pursuit of us therefor, we concluded that there is no material continued risk of having to satisfy contractual obligations relating to preexisting unknown environmental contamination at certain properties. Accordingly, as of March 31, 2025, we had removed $24.2 million of unknown reserve liabilities which had previously been accrued for these properties. There were no removals of unknown reserve liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

We continue to anticipate that our tenants under leases where the Lookback Periods have expired will replace USTs in the years ahead as these USTs near the end of their expected useful lives. At many of these properties the USTs in use are fabricated with older generation materials and technologies and we believe it is prudent to expect that upon their removal preexisting unknown environmental contamination will be identified. Although contractually these tenants are now responsible for preexisting unknown environmental contamination that is discovered during UST replacements, because the applicable Lookback Periods have expired before the end of the initial term of these leases, together with other relevant factors, we believe there remains continued risk that we will be responsible for remediation of preexisting environmental contamination associated with future UST removals at certain properties. Accordingly, we believe it is appropriate at this time to maintain $11.8 million of unknown reserve liabilities for certain properties with respect to which the Lookback Periods have expired as of March 31, 2025.

In the course of UST removals and replacements at certain properties previously leased to Marketing where we retained responsibility for preexisting unknown environmental contamination until expiration of the applicable Lookback Period, environmental contamination has been and continues to be discovered. As a result, we developed an estimate of fair value for the prospective future environmental liability resulting from preexisting unknown environmental contamination and accrued for these estimated costs. These estimates are based primarily upon quantifiable trends which we believe allow us to make reasonable estimates of fair value for the future costs of environmental remediation resulting from the anticipated removal and replacement of USTs. Our accrual of this liability represents our estimate of the fair value of the cost for each component of the liability, net of estimated recoveries from state UST remediation funds considering estimated recovery rates developed from prior experience. In arriving at our accrual, we analyzed the ages and expected useful lives of USTs at properties where we would be responsible for preexisting unknown environmental contamination and we projected a cost to closure for remediation of such contamination.

We measure our environmental remediation liabilities at fair value based on expected future net cash flows, adjusted for inflation, and then discount them to present value. We adjust our environmental remediation liabilities quarterly to reflect changes in projected expenditures, changes in present value due to the passage of time and reductions in estimated liabilities as a result of actual expenditures incurred during each quarter. As of March 31, 2025, we had accrued a total of $20.6 million for our prospective environmental remediation obligations. This accrual consisted of (i) $8.8 million of known reserve liabilities which was our estimate of reasonably estimable environmental remediation liability, including obligations to remove USTs for which we are responsible, net of estimated recoveries and (ii) $11.8 million of unknown reserve liabilities, which was our estimate of future environmental liabilities related to preexisting unknown contamination. As of December 31, 2024, we had accrued a total of $20.9 million for our prospective environmental remediation obligations. This accrual consisted of (i) $9.1 million of known reserve liabilities and (ii) $11.8 million of unknown reserve liabilities, which was our estimate of future environmental liabilities related to preexisting unknown contamination.

Environmental liabilities are accreted for the change in present value due to the passage of time and, accordingly, $0.1 million of net accretion expense was recorded for each of the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, which is included in environmental expenses. In addition, during the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, we recorded credits to environmental expenses aggregating $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, where decreases in estimated remediation costs exceeded the depreciated carrying value of previously capitalized asset retirement costs. Environmental expenses also include project management fees, legal fees and environmental litigation accruals.

Capitalized asset retirement costs are being depreciated over the estimated remaining life of the UST, a 10-year period if the increase in carrying value is related to environmental remediation obligations or such shorter period if circumstances warrant, such as the remaining lease term for properties we lease from others. Depreciation and amortization expense related to capitalized asset retirement costs on our consolidated statements of operations was $0.5 million and $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Capitalized asset retirement costs were $33.1 million (consisting of $25.0 million of known environmental obligations and $8.1 million of reserves for future environmental obligations related to preexisting unknown contamination) as of March 31, 2025, and $33.2 million (consisting of $25.0 million of known environmental obligations and $8.2 million of reserves for future environmental obligations related to preexisting unknown contamination) as of December 31, 2024. We recorded impairment charges aggregating $0.5 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, for capitalized asset retirement costs.

For additional information regarding risks related to our potential environmental exposure, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Operations—“We incur significant operating costs and, from time to time, may have significant liability accruals as a result of environmental laws and regulations, which costs and accruals could significantly increase, and reduce our profitability or have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, ability to pay dividends or stock price” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Environmental Litigation

We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of our business. As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, we had $0.1 million accrued for these matters which we believe were appropriate based on information then currently available. It is possible that our assumptions regarding the ultimate allocation method and share of responsibility that we used to allocate environmental liabilities may change, which may result in our providing an accrual, or adjustments to the amounts recorded, for environmental litigation accruals. Matters related to our former Newark, New Jersey Terminal and the Lower Passaic River, and our MTBE litigations in the states of Pennsylvania and Maryland, in particular, could cause a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, ability to pay dividends or stock price. For additional information with respect to these and other pending environmental lawsuits and claims, see “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, and “Part II, Item 1. Legal Proceedings” and Note 4 in “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to interest rate risk, primarily as a result of borrowings under our Credit Facility, which bears interest at a rate equal to (i) the sum of a SOFR rate plus a SOFR adjustment of 0.10% plus a margin of 1.30% to 1.90% or (ii) the sum of a base rate plus a margin of 0.30% to 0.90%, in each case with the margin based on our consolidated total indebtedness to total asset value ratio at the end of each quarterly reporting period. Of the $157.5 million outstanding as of March 31, 2025 under the Credit Facility, $150.0 million is subject to interest rate swaps that fixed SOFR at a weighted average of 4.73% until October 2026. Including the impact of the swaps, the effective interest rate for these borrowings was 6.13% based on our consolidated total indebtedness as of March 31, 2025.

Based on the remaining outstanding variable borrowings under the Credit Facility of $7.5 million as of March 31, 2025, an increase in market interest rates of 1.0% for 2025 would decrease our 2025 net income and cash flows by approximately $0.1 million. Our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates will increase or decrease in the future with increases or decreases in the outstanding amount under our Credit Facility and with increases or decreases in amounts outstanding under borrowing agreements entered into with interest rates floating at market rates.

See “Part II. Item. 1A. Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or furnished pursuant to the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, we have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective as of March 31, 2025, at the reasonable assurance level.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the first three months of 2025, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Please refer to “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, and to Note 4 in “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for information regarding material pending legal proceedings. Except as set forth therein, there have been no new material legal proceedings and no material developments in any of our previously disclosed legal proceedings reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes to the information previously disclosed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. There have been no material changes in the risk factors described in Item 1A. "Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, aside from the risk factor included below:

Global political and economic uncertainties, including changes in tariff policies and trade relationships, geopolitical conflicts, and public health crises, and their related impact on macroeconomic conditions may adversely impact the market on which our common stock trades, our tenants’ businesses and the markets in which we operate, our operations and our results of operations.

We, and our tenants’ businesses may be disrupted by global political and economic uncertainties, including changes in trade relationships and tariff policies, geopolitical conflicts, and public health crises, that could result in adverse macroeconomic conditions. In April 2025, the Trump administration imposed a 10% tariff on all countries and individualized reciprocal higher tariffs on countries with which the United States has the largest trade deficits, to which certain countries have responded by imposing retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports. Escalated geopolitical tensions resulting from such changes in trade policies and tariffs have significantly disrupted the markets and increased the risk of a major economic recession or slowdown. The extent of the impact of such tariffs and changes in trade policies or other regulatory changes enacted by the current administration is uncertain and unpredictable, and may significantly adversely affect the global economy, the market price of our common stock, and our and our tenants’ businesses. Further, the extent to which public health crises such as pandemics or epidemics impact our business, operations and financial results is uncertain, and will depend on numerous factors that we may not be able to accurately predict, including governmental, business, and individual actions taken in response to any such outbreak and the extent and duration of the adverse impact on the global economy. Such outbreaks may disrupt the supply of products or services from third-party vendors or result in shortages of raw materials necessary to operate our tenants’ businesses or prolonged closure, which may adversely impact their businesses, financial condition and liquidity, and may cause one or more of our tenants to be unable to meet their obligations to us in full, or at all, or to otherwise seek modifications of such obligations. Moreover, general decline in business activity and demand for real estate transactions could adversely affect our ability or desire to grow our portfolio of properties and the financial impact of any such outbreak could negatively impact our future compliance with the financial covenants of our various borrowings, resulting in a default and potentially an acceleration of indebtedness, which non-compliance could negatively impact our ability to make additional borrowings under our Credit Facility and pay dividends.

Additionally, geopolitical conflicts, such as terrorist attacks or other acts of violence or war (including the conflicts in Russia and Ukraine and the Middle East) and the related adverse impact on macroeconomic conditions as a result of such conflicts could negatively affect our business or the businesses of our tenants. Such geopolitical conflicts may also directly or indirectly impact the physical facilities, networks or the business or the financial condition of us or those of our tenants, vendors or financial institutions with which we have a relationship or conduct business. The consequences of such conflicts are unpredictable, and we may not be able to foresee events that could have a material adverse effect on us. More generally, any of these events resulting from global political and economic uncertainties could cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease, result in an economic recession or increase volatility of the financial markets and economy of the United States and worldwide. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, ability to pay dividends or stock price.

Adverse developments in general business, economic or political conditions could have a material adverse effect on us.

Adverse developments in general business and economic conditions, including through inflation, recession, or other kinds of negative economic change, either in the economy generally or in those regions in which a large portion of our business is conducted, could have a material adverse effect on us and significantly increase certain of the risks to which we are subject. Among other effects, adverse economic conditions, including those resulting from changes in trade policies or tariffs, could depress real estate values, impact our ability to re-lease or sell our properties and have an adverse effect on our tenants’ level of sales and financial performance generally. As our revenues are substantially dependent on the economic success of our tenants, any factors that adversely impact our tenants could also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, liquidity, ability to pay dividends or stock price.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS


Exhibit Number	Description of Document	Location of Document

31.1	Certification of Christopher J. Constant, President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.	Filed herewith.

31.2	Certification of Brian Dickman, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.	Filed herewith.

32.1	Certification of Christopher J. Constant, President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350.	Furnished herewith.

32.2	Certification of Brian Dickman, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350.	Furnished herewith.

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.	Filed herewith.

101.SCH	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.	Filed herewith.

101.CAL	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.	Filed herewith.

101.DEF	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.	Filed herewith.

101.LAB	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.	Filed herewith.

101.PRE	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.	Filed herewith.

104	Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).	Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: April 24, 2025


	Getty Realty Corp.

	By:	/s/ CHRISTOPHER J. CONSTANT
		Christopher J. Constant President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

	By:	/s/ BRIAN R. DICKMAN
		Brian R. Dickman Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

	By:	/s/ EUGENE SHNAYDERMAN
		Eugene Shnayderman Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)