PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation that arises from the ordinary operations of business, such as contractual or employment disputes or other general actions. In the event of an adverse outcome of these proceedings, the Company believes the resulting liabilities would not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. See Part I, Item 1, Note 10, “Commitments and Contingencies” for detailed discussion of ongoing litigation.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors that were previously disclosed in Item 1A in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 filed with the SEC on February 27, 2026, except the following risk factors are added due to the Merger. As a result of the Merger, TEGNA became a wholly owned subsidiary of Nexstar.
Adverse results from litigation relating to the Merger could impact our business practices and operating results.
We are currently involved in legal proceedings with various parties seeking to enjoin the Merger. On March 18, 2026, a coalition of eight state attorneys general (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, New York, North Carolina, Oregon and Virginia, collectively, the “Initial States”) and DIRECTV, in two separate actions, brought civil lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California against Nexstar Media Group and TEGNA seeking to enjoin Nexstar’s Merger with TEGNA. Both complaints allege, among other things, that the merger of Nexstar and TEGNA violates federal antitrust laws. The complaints were filed prior to the consummation of the Merger but remain ongoing. On March 19, 2026, the Merger was consummated. On March 20, 2026, DIRECTV and the states requested temporary restraining orders (“TROs”) from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California to prevent Nexstar and TEGNA from integrating their operations. On March 27, 2026, the court entered a TRO requiring Nexstar to hold TEGNA separate until further ruling. On April 17, 2026, the court entered a preliminary injunction prohibiting further integration of Nexstar and TEGNA, which became effective on April 21, 2026. On April 21, 2026, Nexstar filed a notice of appeal with respect to the preliminary injunction to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and that appeal remains pending. Nexstar did not seek a stay of the preliminary injunction. On April 30, 2026, DIRECTV filed its Amended Complaint for Injunctive Relief and the Initial States plus the attorneys general for Indiana, Kansas, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Vermont filed Plaintiff States’ First Amended Complaint for Permanent Injunction.
On March 21, 2026, six state cable associations (Pennsylvania, Washington, Indiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Virginia) along with Newsmax filed a notice of appeal or, alternatively, petition for writ of mandamus in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit challenging the FCC approval of the Merger. These parties also sought a stay of the FCC approval order and injunctive relief similar to that sought in the California cases. On March 23, 2026, five public interest parties filed a similar notice of appeal or, alternatively, emergency petition for writ of mandamus in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit challenging the FCC approval, which has been consolidated with the appeal filed by the cable associations. On April 28, 2026, the D.C. Circuit denied the emergency motions for a stay pending appeal finding the appellants had not satisfied the requirements for a stay pending appeal and also ordered briefing by the FCC, the Company and the appellants on the emergency petitions for writ of mandamus, with such briefing to be completed by May 18, 2026.
Additional challenges to the FCC approval of the Merger and requests for stay and injunction have been filed at the agency. Other parties may also seek injunctive relief or other actions or remedies. Any adverse outcome in such lawsuits and any other lawsuits or legal challenges could have an adverse impact, which may be material, on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to realize anticipated benefits and synergies from the Merger, or could result in the divestiture of selected assets or all TEGNA assets (see Note 10).
In addition, as of March 2, 2026, three complaints were filed by purported stockholders of TEGNA in connection with the Merger as further described in Note 10. We assumed contingencies from these proceedings in connection with the Merger. The complaints generally allege that the preliminary proxy statement filed by TEGNA on September 17,