Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain "disclosure controls and procedures," as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to meet reasonable assurance standards. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
There were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended September 30, 2025 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially effect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
From time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings or investigations which could have an adverse impact on our reputation, business and financial condition and divert the attention of our management from the operation of our business. We are not presently a party to any legal proceedings that, if determined adversely to us, would individually or taken together have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors as disclosed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed March 3, 2025. These risk factors may not describe every risk facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business could be adversely affected by a prolonged federal government shutdown, particularly if it results in interruptions to Medicare, Medicaid, or other federally funded healthcare programs.
Our business could be adversely affected by a prolonged federal government shutdown, particularly if it results in interruptions to Medicare, Medicaid, or other federally funded healthcare programs. These programs represent a significant portion of our revenue, and any delay in payments, coverage decisions, or patient access could materially impact our financial results. Additionally, a shutdown may delay regulatory approvals and hinder our ability to launch new products, further affecting our growth prospects.
There can be no assurance that our common stock will maintain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement or other applicable listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC or another national securities exchange.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to meet The Nasdaq Global Market listing standards. We have in the past, and may in the future, be unable to comply with certain of the listing standards that we are required to meet to maintain the listing of our common shares on The Nasdaq Global Market. If we are unable to maintain compliance with all applicable listing standards, our common stock may no longer be listed on The Nasdaq Global Market or another national securities exchange and the liquidity and market price of our common stock may be adversely affected.
On March 24, 2025, we received written notice from the Staff of Nasdaq notifying us that we no longer complied with the minimum bid price requirement for continued listing on The Nasdaq Global Market. On September 15, 2025, we effected a 1-for-20 reverse stock split and on September 26, 2025, we received a letter from the Staff notifying us that we had regained compliance with the minimum bid price requirement for continued listing on The Nasdaq Global Market, and the matter is now closed.
If in the future we fail to meet Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements and Nasdaq delists our common stock from trading on its exchange and we are not able to list our securities on another national securities exchange, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including, without limitation, a substantial reduction in the liquidity of our common stock, which could limit our access to capital markets for any potential future fundraising.
Enhanced U.S. tariffs, import/export restrictions or other trade barriers may have a negative effect on global economic conditions, financial markets and our business.
There is currently significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the U.S. and various other countries with respect to trade policies, treaties, tariffs and taxes. Current or future tariffs imposed by the U.S. may negatively impact our business. During 2025, the U.S. presidential administration has threatened and imposed significant tariffs on imports from various countries, and has indicated that additional tariffs may be imposed in the future. In response, some of these countries have announced or imposed tariffs on imports from the U.S. The duration for which enacted tariffs will be in place remain uncertain and protracted trade disputes could lead to economic decline, which could negatively impact our results of operations.
FDA is phasing out its general policy of enforcement discretion and will regulate laboratory developed tests as medical devices.
The laws and regulations governing the marketing of diagnostic products are evolving, extremely complex and in many instances, there are no significant regulatory or judicial interpretations of these laws and regulations. Pursuant to its authority under the FDCA, the FDA has jurisdiction over medical devices, including in vitro diagnostics and, therefore, potentially our clinical laboratory tests.
Pursuant to the FDCA and its implementing regulations, the FDA regulates the research, testing, manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage, recordkeeping, premarket clearance or approval, marketing and promotion, and sales and distribution of medical devices in the United States to ensure that medical products distributed domestically are safe and effective for their intended uses. Although the FDA has asserted that it has authority to regulate the development and use of LDTs, such as our and many other laboratories’ tests, as medical devices, it has generally exercised enforcement discretion and is currently not otherwise regulating most tests developed and performed within a single high complexity CLIA-certified laboratory. Pursuant to this enforcement discretion policy, FDA does not require