In May 2025, the City of Peabody, Massachusetts ("Peabody") filed suit in Minnesota federal court against multiple defendants, including Chemours, relating to the alleged presence of PFAS in turnout gear. Peabody alleges claims on behalf of all proposed class members defined to be all municipalities or other governmental entities in the various states of the United States of America that have purchased fire fighter PPE. Peabody seeks compensatory damages to allow Peabody and the class members to remove and dispose of the PPE containing PFAS and purchase replacement sets that do not contain PFAS, exemplary damages, and attorney’s fees and costs.
In June 2025, Joseph Lepouski and Lisa Marie Lepouski (“Lepouski”) filed suit in Pennsylvania state court against multiple defendants, including Chemours, alleging that alleged presence of PFAS in turnout gear resulted in Mr. Lepouski developing testicular cancer. Lepouski alleges that each Defendant breached implied and express warranties of marketability through their sale of PFAS-containing turnouts, that each Defendant was negligent in their role resulting in Plaintiffs’ exposure to PFAS, that each Defendant is strictly liable for defectively designing turnouts and failing to warn Plaintiffs of the risk of PFAS, and that each Defendant’s conduct was willful and wanton. Plaintiffs seek compensatory damages for pain, suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and other noneconomic damages; economic damages in the form of medical expenses, out of pocket expenses, lost earnings, and other economic damages; and punitive damages. Plaintiff has dismissed this case and is refiling in the AFFF MDL.
In July 2025, Robert Taylor (“Taylor”) filed suit in Pennsylvania state court against multiple defendants, including Chemours, alleging that alleged presence of PFAS in turnout gear resulted in Taylor developing kidney cancer. Taylor alleges that each Defendant breached implied and express warranties of marketability through their sale of PFAS containing turnouts, that each Defendant was negligent in their role resulting in Plaintiffs’ exposure to PFAS, that each Defendant is strictly liable for defectively designing turnouts and failing to warn Plaintiffs of the risk of PFAS, and that each Defendant’s conduct was willful and wanton. Taylor seeks compensatory damages for pain, suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and other noneconomic damages; economic damages in the form of medical expenses, out of pocket expenses, lost earnings, and other economic damages; and punitive damages. Plaintiff has dismissed this case and is refiling in the AFFF MDL.
In July 2025, Whitney Wilkie and Thomas Holmberg filed suit in Georgia state court against Shaw, Aladdin, Mohawk, 3M, INV Performance Surfaces, EIDP, Corteva, and the Company alleging soil, groundwater and dust on their land in the Howell Creek watershed in Gwinnet County, Georgia are contaminated with PFAS supplied and/or used by defendants in nearby carpet mills. The suit claims negligence, negligence per se arising from violations of the Georgia Quality Control Act, negligent failure to warn, public nuisance, wanton conduct, and punitive damages. The plaintiffs seek compensation for past and future damages, punitive damages and attorneys’ fees and other relief the Court deems just, equitable and proper.
In July 2025, Carl Loudermilk, Dennis Pharr, and Gordon Stafford filed suit in Georgia state court against Shaw, Aladdin, Mohawk, 3M, INV Performance Surfaces, EIDP, Corteva, and the Company alleging soil, groundwater and dust on their land in the Polecat Creek watershed in Murray County, Georgia are contaminated with PFAS supplied and/or used by defendants in nearby carpet mills. The suit claims negligence, negligence per se arising from violations of the Georgia Quality Control Act, negligent failure to warn, public nuisance, wanton conduct, and punitive damages. The plaintiffs seek compensation for past and future damages, punitive damages and attorneys’ fees and other relief the Court deems just, equitable and proper.
In July 2025, Jerry Harrott, Bob Bartow, James Hulsey and Rodney Squires filed suit in Georgia state court against Shaw, Aladdin, Mohawk, 3M, INV Performance Surfaces, EIDP, Corteva, and the Company alleging soil, groundwater and dust on their land in the Salacoa Creek watershed in Gordon County, Georgia are contaminated with PFAS supplied and/or used by defendants in nearby carpet mills. The suit claims negligence, negligence per se arising from violations of the Georgia Quality Control Act, negligent failure to warn, public nuisance, wanton conduct, and punitive damages. The plaintiffs seek compensation for past and future damages, punitive damages and attorneys’ fees and other relief the Court deems just, equitable and proper.
In July 2025, Brandon Gibson, Brett Wright, Amy Wright, David Mcgill, Shae Hager, and Stuart Mason filed suit in Georgia state court against Shaw, Aladdin, Mohawk, 3M, INV Performance Surfaces, EIDP, Corteva, and the Company alleging soil, groundwater and dust on their land in the Coosawattee River watershed in Murray County and/or Gordon County are contaminated with PFAS supplied and/or used by defendants in nearby carpet mills. The suit claims negligence, negligence per se arising from violations of the Georgia Quality Control Act, negligent failure to warn, public nuisance, wanton conduct, and punitive damages. The plaintiffs seek compensation for past and future damages, punitive damages and attorneys’ fees and other relief the Court deems just, equitable and proper.
In July 2025, Dan Bramblett, Donna Falun, T.B. Construction, Inc., Tracy Burns, Bryan Lester, David Bryant, William Combs, and Lorette Hufstetler filed suit in Georgia state court against Shaw, Aladdin, Mohawk, 3M, INV Performance Surfaces, EIDP, Corteva, and the Company alleging soil, groundwater and dust on their land in the Conasauga River watershed in Gordon County, Georgia are contaminated with PFAS supplied and/or used by defendants in nearby carpet mills. The suit claims negligence, negligence per se arising from violations of the Georgia Quality Control Act, negligent failure to warn, public nuisance, wanton conduct, and punitive damages. The plaintiffs seek compensation for past and future damages, punitive damages and attorneys’ fees and other relief the Court deems just, equitable and proper.