SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark one)
☒
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024
☐
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from to___________
Commission file number 001-39043
BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
95-4547287
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
4601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 150
Los Angeles, California
|
|
90010
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(323) 634-1700
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class:
|
Trading Symbol(s)
|
Name of each exchange on which registered:
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
(including attached preferred stock purchase rights)
|
BYFC
|
Nasdaq Capital Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well‑known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S‑T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non‑accelerated, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth
company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large accelerated filer ☐
|
Accelerated filer ☐
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer ☒
|
Smaller reporting company ☒
|
|
|
Emerging growth company ☐
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised
financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over
financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by
check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements
that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Aggregate market value of the voting and non‑voting common stock held by non‑affiliates as of June 30, 2024: $38.1 million.
As of March 21, 2025, 6,022,227 shares of the
registrant’s Class A voting common stock, 1,425,574 shares of the registrant’s Class B non-voting common stock and 1,672,562 shares of the registrant’s Class C non‑voting common stock were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed no later than April 30, 2025, are incorporated
by reference in Part III, Items 10 through 14 of this report.
PART I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
1
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
24
|
|
Item 1B.
|
|
30
|
|
Item 1C.
|
|
30
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
31
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
31
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
31
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
32 |
|
Item 7.
|
|
33
|
|
Item 7A.
|
|
42
|
|
Item 8.
|
|
43
|
|
Item 9.
|
|
43
|
|
Item 9A.
|
|
43
|
|
Item 9B.
|
|
45
|
|
Item 9C.
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 10.
|
|
46
|
|
Item 11.
|
|
46
|
|
Item 12.
|
|
46
|
|
Item 13.
|
|
46
|
|
Item 14.
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
PART IV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 15.
|
|
47 |
|
Item 16.
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
Forward‑Looking Statements
Certain statements herein, including without limitation, certain matters discussed under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of
this Form 10‑K, are forward‑looking statements, within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, that reflect our current views
with respect to future events and financial performance. Forward‑looking statements typically include the words “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “budget,” “forecast,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “believes,”
“predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “poised,” “optimistic,” “prospects,” “ability,” “looking,” “forward,” “invest,” “grow,” “improve,” “deliver” and similar expressions, but the absence of such words or expressions does not mean a statement is
not forward-looking. These forward‑looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those identified below, which could cause actual future results to differ materially from historical results or from those anticipated or
implied by such statements. Readers should not place undue reliance on these forward‑looking statements, which speak only as of their dates or, if no date is provided, then as of the date of this Form 10‑K. We undertake no obligation to update or
revise any forward‑looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent required by law.
The following factors, among others, could cause future results to differ materially from historical results or from those indicated by forward‑looking statements included in this Form 10‑K: (1) the
level of demand for mortgage and commercial loans, which is affected by such external factors as general economic conditions, market interest rate levels, tax laws and the demographics of our lending markets; (2) the direction and magnitude of
changes in interest rates and the relationship between market interest rates and the yield on our interest‑earning assets and the cost of our interest‑bearing liabilities; (3) the rate and amount of credit losses incurred and projected to be
incurred by us, increases in the amounts of our nonperforming assets, the level of our loss reserves and management’s judgments regarding the collectability of loans; (4) changes in the regulation of lending and deposit operations or other
regulatory actions, whether industry-wide or focused on our operations, including increases in capital requirements or directives to increase allowances for credit losses or make other changes in our business operations; (5) legislative or
regulatory changes, including those that may be implemented by the current administration in Washington, D.C. and the Federal Reserve Board; (6) possible adverse rulings, judgments, settlements and other outcomes of litigation; (7) actions
undertaken by both current and potential new competitors; (8) the possibility of adverse trends in property values or economic trends in the residential and commercial real estate markets in which we compete; (9) the effect of changes in general
economic conditions; (10) the effect of geopolitical uncertainties; (11) the impact of health crises on our future financial condition and operations; (12) the impact of any volatility in the banking sector due to the failure of certain banks due
to high levels of exposure to liquidity risk, interest rate risk, uninsured deposits and cryptocurrency risk; (13) other risks and uncertainties detailed in this Form 10‑K, including those described in Part I. Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Part II,
Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
General
Broadway Financial Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated under Delaware law in 1995 for the purpose of acquiring and holding all of the outstanding capital stock of Broadway Federal Savings
and Loan Association as part of the bank’s conversion from a federally chartered mutual savings association to a federally chartered stock savings bank. In connection with the conversion, the bank’s name was changed to Broadway Federal Bank,
f.s.b. (“Broadway Federal”). The conversion was completed, and Broadway Federal became a wholly‑owned subsidiary of the Company, in January 1996.
On April 1, 2021, the Company completed its merger (the “Merger”) with CFBanc Corporation (“CFBanc”), with the Company continuing as the surviving entity. Immediately following the Merger, Broadway
Federal merged with and into City First Bank of D.C, National Association with City First Bank of D.C., National Association continuing as the surviving entity (combined with Broadway Federal, “City First” or the “Bank”). Concurrently with the
Merger, the Bank changed its name to City First Bank, National Association.
Concurrently with the completion of the Merger, the Company converted to become a public benefit corporation. The Company works to spur equitable economic development with a mission to strengthen
the overall well-being of historically excluded communities and has deployed loans and investments in the communities we serve that we believe has helped close funding gaps, preserved or increased access to affordable housing, created and
preserved jobs, and expanded critical social services. We believe our status as a Delaware public benefit corporation aligns our business model of creating social, economic, and environmental value for underserved communities with a stakeholder
governance model that allows us to give careful consideration to the impact of our decisions on workers, customers, suppliers, community, the environment, and our impact on society; and to align further our mission and values to our
organizational documents.
Reverse Stock Split
On October 31, 2023, the Company effected a reverse stock split of the Company’s outstanding shares of Class A common stock, Class B common stock, and Class C common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, at a ratio of 1-for-8 (the “Reverse Stock Split”). The shares of Class A Common Stock listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market commenced trading on The Nasdaq Capital Market on a post-Reverse Stock Split adjusted basis at the open of business
on November 1, 2023. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, the number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split was reduced such that every 8 shares of common stock held by a stockholder
immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split were combined and reclassified into one share of common stock. All common stock share amounts and per share numbers discussed herein have been retroactively adjusted, as applicable, for the Reverse
Stock Split.
Share Repurchase
On October 31, 2023 the Company purchased 244,771 shares of its Class A (voting) Common Stock (adjusted for the 1-for-8 reverse stock split effective November 1, 2023 - for more information about the reverse stock
split, see Note 2) from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), which obtained the shares when it was appointed receiver for First Republic Bank upon its closure earlier in 2023. The purchased shares represented just under 4.0% of the
Company’s total voting shares prior to the purchase, and over 2.6% of the Company’s total common equity. The Company purchased the shares at a price of $7.2760 per share (adjusted for the 1-for-8 reverse stock split effective November 1, 2023),
which represented the 20-day volume weighted average price for the Class A shares over the period ended October 24, 2023. The purchase was financed from cash on hand and the shares were retired.
The Company is currently regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”). The Bank is currently regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”)
and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). The Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC. The Bank is also a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (the “FHLB”). See “Regulation” for further
descriptions of the regulatory systems to which the Company and the Bank are subject.
Available Information
Our internet website address is www.cityfirstbank.com. Our annual reports on Form 10‑K, quarterly reports on Form 10‑Q, current reports on Form 8‑K and all amendments to those reports
are available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such material with, or furnish such material to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and can be obtained free of charge by sending a written request to
Broadway Financial Corporation, 4601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 150, Los Angeles, California 90010 Attention: Audrey Phillips. The SEC also maintains an internet site at www.sec.gov that contains
reports, proxy and information statements, and other information filed electronically by us with the SEC.
Business Overview
The Company is headquartered in Los Angeles, California and our principal business is the operation of our wholly‑owned subsidiary, City First, which has three offices: two in California (in Los
Angeles and the nearby city of Inglewood) and one in Washington, D.C. City First’s principal business consists of attracting deposits from the general public in the areas surrounding our branch offices, loan customers, large non-profit entities,
local municipalities, and depositors who believe in the Bank’s mission-driven focus. These deposits, together with funds generated from operations and borrowings, primarily in loans secured by residential properties with five or more units
(“multi‑family”) and commercial real estate. Our assets also include loans secured by commercial business assets as well as residential properties with one‑to‑four units (“single-family”). In addition, we invest in securities issued by federal
government agencies, residential mortgage‑backed securities and other investments.
Our revenue is derived primarily from interest income on loans and investments. Our principal costs are interest expenses that we incur on deposits and borrowings, together with general and
administrative expenses. Our earnings are significantly affected by general economic and competitive conditions, particularly monetary trends, and conditions, including changes in market interest rates and the differences in market interest rates
for the interest-bearing deposits and borrowings that are our principal funding sources and the interest yielding assets in which we invest, as well as government policies and actions of regulatory authorities.
Lending Activities
General
Our loan portfolio is comprised primarily of commercial mortgage loans which are secured by multi‑family residential properties, single-family residential properties and commercial real estate,
including charter schools, community facilities, and churches. The remainder of the loan portfolio consists of commercial business loans, loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) and construction-to-permanent loans. At
December 31, 2024, our net loan portfolio totaled $968.9 million, or 74.3% of total assets.
We emphasize the origination of adjustable‑rate loans, most of which are hybrid loans (loans having an initial fixed rate period which are initially five years, followed by an adjustable-rate
period), for our portfolio of loans held for investment. We originate these loans in order to maintain a high percentage of loans that have provisions for periodic repricing, thereby reducing our exposure to interest rate risk. At December 31,
2024, more than 84% of our loans had adjustable-rate features. However, most of our adjustable-rate loans behave like fixed rate loans for periods of time because the loans may still be in their initial fixed‑rate period or may be subject to
interest rate floors.
The types of loans that we originate are subject to federal laws and regulations. The interest rates that we charge on loans are affected by the demand for such loans, the supply of money available
for lending purposes and the rates offered by competitors. These factors are in turn affected by, among other things, economic conditions, monetary policies of the federal government, including the FRB, and legislative tax policies. See
“Regulation” for more information on the government regulations to which we are subject.
The following table details the composition of our portfolio of loans held for investment by type, dollar amount and percentage of loan portfolio at the dates indicated:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of total
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of total
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of total
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of total
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Single-family
|
|
$
|
23,566
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
%
|
|
$
|
24,702
|
|
|
|
2.79
|
%
|
|
$
|
30,038
|
|
|
|
3.89
|
%
|
|
$
|
45,372
|
|
|
|
6.96
|
%
|
|
$
|
48,217
|
|
|
|
13.32
|
%
|
Multi‑family
|
|
|
633,306
|
|
|
|
64.94
|
%
|
|
|
561,447
|
|
|
|
63.33
|
%
|
|
|
502,141
|
|
|
|
65.08
|
%
|
|
|
393,704
|
|
|
|
60.36
|
%
|
|
|
272,387
|
|
|
|
75.24
|
%
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
156,155
|
|
|
|
16.01
|
%
|
|
|
119,436
|
|
|
|
13.47
|
%
|
|
|
114,574
|
|
|
|
14.85
|
%
|
|
|
93,193
|
|
|
|
14.29
|
%
|
|
|
24,289
|
|
|
|
6.71
|
%
|
Church
|
|
|
9,470
|
|
|
|
0.97
|
%
|
|
|
12,717
|
|
|
|
1.43
|
%
|
|
|
15,780
|
|
|
|
2.04
|
%
|
|
|
22,503
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
%
|
|
|
16,658
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
80,948
|
|
|
|
8.30
|
%
|
|
|
89,887
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
%
|
|
|
40,703
|
|
|
|
5.27
|
%
|
|
|
32,072
|
|
|
|
4.92
|
%
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
Commercial - other
|
|
|
70,596
|
|
|
|
7.24
|
%
|
|
|
63,450
|
|
|
|
7.16
|
%
|
|
|
64,841
|
|
|
|
8.40
|
%
|
|
|
46,539
|
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
SBA Loans
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
14,954
|
|
|
|
1.68
|
%
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
%
|
|
|
18,837
|
|
|
|
2.89
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
Consumer
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
Gross loans
|
|
|
975,196
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
886,606
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
771,689
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
652,220
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
362,044
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums on loans purchased
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan costs, net
|
|
|
2,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit and interest marks on purchased loans, net
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized discounts
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit/loan losses
|
|
|
8,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held for investment
|
|
$
|
968,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
880,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
768,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
648,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
360,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents loan categories by maturity for the period indicated. Actual repayments historically have, and will likely in the future, differ significantly from contractual
maturities because individual borrowers generally have the right to prepay loans, with or without prepayment penalties.
|
|
December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
One Year or
Less
|
|
|
More Than
One Year to
Five Years
|
|
|
More Than
Five Years to
15 Years
|
|
|
More Than
15 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Loans receivable held for investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family
|
|
$
|
2,333
|
|
|
$
|
8,433
|
|
|
$
|
5,005
|
|
|
$
|
7,795
|
|
|
$
|
23,566
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
12,504
|
|
|
|
17,324
|
|
|
|
11,910
|
|
|
|
591,568
|
|
|
|
633,306
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
17,779
|
|
|
|
75,841
|
|
|
|
40,110
|
|
|
|
22,425
|
|
|
|
156,155
|
|
Church
|
|
|
1,343
|
|
|
|
2,930
|
|
|
|
5,197
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
9,470
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
39,982
|
|
|
|
39,410
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
80,948
|
|
Commercial - other
|
|
|
7,539
|
|
|
|
23,812
|
|
|
|
37,181
|
|
|
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
70,596
|
|
SBA loans
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
$
|
81,493
|
|
|
$
|
168,152
|
|
|
$
|
101,699
|
|
|
$
|
623,852
|
|
|
$
|
975,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans maturities after one year with:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,105
|
|
|
$
|
2,319
|
|
|
$
|
5,057
|
|
|
$
|
15,481
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,309
|
|
|
|
7,812
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
21,121
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,434
|
|
|
|
28,680
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
100,114
|
|
Church
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,369
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2,369
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,753
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
9,309
|
|
Commercial - other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,812
|
|
|
|
36,170
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
44,982
|
|
SBA loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
111,782
|
|
|
$
|
76,537
|
|
|
$
|
5,057
|
|
|
$
|
193,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
328
|
|
|
$
|
2,686
|
|
|
$
|
2,738
|
|
|
$
|
5,752
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,015
|
|
|
|
4,098
|
|
|
|
591,568
|
|
|
|
599,681
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,407
|
|
|
|
11,430
|
|
|
|
22,425
|
|
|
|
38,262
|
|
Church
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
5,197
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
5,758
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,657
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
31,657
|
|
Commercial - other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
18,075
|
|
SBA loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56,370
|
|
|
$
|
25,162
|
|
|
$
|
618,795
|
|
|
$
|
700,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
168,152
|
|
|
$
|
101,699
|
|
|
$
|
623,852
|
|
|
$
|
893,703
|
|
Multi‑Family and Commercial Real Estate Lending
Our primary lending emphasis has been on the origination of loans for multi-family with five or more units. These multi‑family loans amounted to $633.3 million and $561.4 million at December 31,
2024 and 2023, respectively. Multi‑family loans represented 64.94% of our gross loan portfolio at December 31, 2024 compared to 63.33% of our gross loan portfolio at December 31, 2023. Most of our multi‑family loans amortize over 30 years. As of
December 31, 2024, our single largest multi‑family credit had an outstanding balance of $11.4 million, was current, and was collateralized by a 53-unit apartment complex in Downey, California. At December 31, 2024, the average balance of a loan
in our multi‑family portfolio was $1.3 million.
Our commercial real estate loans amounted to $156.2 million and $119.4 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Commercial real estate loans represented 16.01% and 13.47% of our gross
loan portfolios at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Most commercial real estate loans are originated with principal repayments on a 25- to 30-year amortization schedule but are due in 5 years or 10 years. As of December 31, 2024, our
single largest commercial real estate credit had an outstanding principal balance of $15.0 million, was current, and was collateralized by a charter school located in Washington, D.C. At December 31, 2024, the average balance of a loan in our
commercial real estate portfolio was $2.9 million.
The interest rates on multi‑family and commercial adjustable-rate mortgage loans (“ARM Loans”) are based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”). The interest rates on
commercial real estate loans are based on a variety of indices, including two-year Treasury, five-year Treasury, seven-year Treasury and ten-year Treasury and the five-year FHLB.
All loans previously indexed to LIBOR were converted to SOFR as of December 31, 2022. We currently offer adjustable-rate loans with interest rates that adjust either semi‑annually or semi‑annually
upon expiration of an initial three‑ or five‑year fixed rate period. Borrowers are required to make monthly payments under the terms of such loans.
Loans secured by multi‑family and commercial properties are granted based on the income producing potential of the property and the financial strength of the borrower. The primary factors considered
include, among other things, the net operating income of the mortgaged premises before debt service and depreciation, the debt service coverage ratio (the ratio of net operating income to required principal and interest payments, or debt
service), and the ratio of the loan amount to the lower of the purchase price or the appraised value of the collateral.
We seek to mitigate the risks associated with multi‑family and commercial real estate loans by applying appropriate underwriting requirements, which include limitations on loan‑to‑value ratios and
debt service coverage ratios. Under our underwriting policies, loan‑to‑value ratios on our multi‑family and commercial real estate loans usually do not exceed 75% of the lower of the purchase price or the appraised value of the underlying
property. We also generally require minimum debt service coverage ratios of 120% for multi‑family loans and commercial real estate loans. Properties securing multi‑family and commercial real estate loans are appraised by management‑approved
independent appraisers. Title insurance is required on all loans.
Multi‑family and commercial real estate loans are generally viewed as exposing the lender to a greater risk of loss than single-family residential loans and typically involve higher loan principal
amounts than loans secured by single-family residential real estate. Because payments on loans secured by multi‑family and commercial real properties are often dependent on the successful operation or management of the properties, repayment of
such loans may be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market or general economy. Adverse economic conditions in our primary lending market area could result in reduced cash flows on multi‑family and commercial real estate loans,
vacancies and reduced rental rates on such properties. We seek to reduce these risks by originating such loans on a selective basis and generally restrict such loans to our general market area. In 2008, Broadway Federal ceased out‑of‑state
lending for all types of loans. As a result of the Merger, in 2021 we resumed out-of-state lending on a selective basis; however, we currently do not have any loans outstanding that are outside of our market area, which consists of Southern
California and the Washington, D.C. area (including parts of Maryland and Virginia).
Certain multi-family loans have adjustable-rate features based on SOFR but are fixed for the first five years. Depending on interest rate trends, some multi-family loans may pay-off during the first
five years, while others continue into the adjustable-rate phase. The interest rates on loans that continue into the adjustable-rate phase are adjusted semi-annually subject to interest rate caps.
Our church loans totaled $9.5 million and $12.7 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, which represented 0.97% and 1.43% of our gross loan portfolio at December 31, 2024 and 2023,
respectively. Broadway Federal ceased originating church loans in 2010 in Southern California; however, City First originates loans to churches in the Washington, D.C. area as part of its community development mission. As of December 31, 2024,
our single largest church loan had an outstanding balance of $2.2 million, was current, and was collateralized by a church building and parcel of land in Baltimore, Maryland. At December 31, 2024, the average balance of a loan in our church loan
portfolio was $631 thousand.
Single-Family Mortgage Lending
While we have historically been primarily a multi‑family and commercial real estate lender, we also have purchased or originated loans secured by single-family residential properties, including
investor‑owned properties, with maturities of up to 30 years. Single-family loans totaled $23.6 million and $24.7 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Of the single-family residential mortgage loans outstanding at December 31,
2024, more than 26% had adjustable-rate features. We did not purchase any single-family loans during 2024 or 2023. Of the $23.6 million of single-family loans at December 31, 2024, $17.6 million are secured by investor‑owned properties.
The interest rates for our single-family ARM Loans are indexed to COFI, SOFR, 12‑MTA and 1‑Yr. CMT. All loans previously indexed to LIBOR were converted to SOFR as of December 31, 2022. We currently
offer loans with interest rates that adjust either semi‑annually or semi‑annually upon expiration of an initial three or five‑year fixed rate period. Borrowers are required to make monthly payments under the terms of such loans. Most of our
single-family adjustable-rate loans behave like fixed rate loans because the loans are still in their initial fixed rate period or are subject to interest rate floors.
We qualify our ARM Loan borrowers based upon the fully indexed interest rate (SOFR or other index plus an applicable margin) provided by the terms of the loan. However, we may discount the initial
rate paid by the borrower to adjust for market and other competitive factors. The ARM Loans that we offer have a lifetime adjustment limit that is set at the time that the loan is approved. In addition, because of interest rate caps and floors,
market rates may exceed or go below the respective maximum or minimum rates payable on our ARM Loans.
The mortgage loans that we originate generally include due‑on‑sale clauses, which provide us with the contractual right to declare the loan immediately due and payable if the borrower transfers
ownership of the property.
Construction Lending
Construction loans totaled $80.9 million and $89.9 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and represented 8.30% and 10.14% of our gross loan portfolio at December 31, 2024 and 2023,
respectively. We provide loans for the construction of quality, affordable single-family, multi‑family and commercial real estate projects and for land development. We generally make construction and land loans at variable interest rates based
upon the applicable Treasury Index plus a margin. Generally, we require a loan‑to‑value ratio not exceeding 75% and a loan‑to‑cost ratio not exceeding 85% on construction loans.
Construction loans involve risks that are different from those for completed project lending because we advance loan funds based upon the security and estimated value at completion of the project
under construction. If the borrower defaults on the loan, we may have to advance additional funds to finance the project’s completion before the project can be sold. Moreover, construction projects are affected by uncertainties inherent in
estimating construction costs, potential delays in construction schedules due to supply chain or other issues, market demand and the accuracy of estimates of the value of the completed project considered in the loan approval process. In addition,
construction projects can be risky as they transition to completion and lease‑up. Tenants who may have been interested in leasing a unit or apartment may not be able to afford the space when the building is completed or may fail to lease the
space for other reasons such as more attractive terms offered by competing lessors, making it difficult for the building to generate enough cash flow for the owner to obtain permanent financing. We specialize in the origination of construction
loans for affordable housing developments where rents are subsidized by housing authority agencies. During 2024, we originated $7.6 million of construction loans, compared to $40.0 million of construction loan originations during 2023.
Commercial Lending
Our commercial lending portfolio consists of loans and lending activities to businesses in our market area that are secured by business assets including inventory, receivables, machinery, and
equipment. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, non-real estate commercial loans totaled $70.6 million and $63.5 million, respectively. Commercial loans represented 7.24% and 7.16% of our loan portfolio as of December 31, 2024 and 2023,
respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2024, we originated $17.6 million of commercial loans. As of December 31, 2024, our single largest commercial loan had an outstanding balance of $15.0 million. At December 31, 2024, the average
balance of a loan in our non-real estate commercial loan portfolio was $3.4 million.
The risks related to commercial loans differ from loans secured by real estate and relate to the ability of borrowers to successfully operate their businesses and the difference between expected and
actual cash flows of the borrowers. In addition, the recoverability of our investment in these loans is also dependent on other factors primarily dictated by the type of collateral securing these loans. The fair value of the collateral securing
these loans may fluctuate as market conditions change. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the recovery of our investment is dependent upon the borrower’s ability to collect amounts due from customers.
SBA Guaranteed Loans
City First is an approved SBA lender. We originate loans in Washington, D.C, Maryland, Virginia and California under the SBA’s 7(a), SBA Express, International Trade and 504(a) loan programs, in
conformity with SBA underwriting and documentation standards. SBA loans are similar to commercial business loans but have additional credit enhancement provided by the U.S. Federal Government with guarantees between 50-85%. Certain loans
classified as SBA are secured by commercial real estate property. All other SBA loans are secured by business assets. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, SBA loans totaled $1.1 million and $15.0 million, respectively.
Loan Originations, Purchases and Sales
The following table summarizes loan originations, purchases, sales, and principal repayments for the periods indicated:
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Gross loans: (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
886,606
|
|
|
$
|
771,689
|
|
|
$
|
652,220
|
|
Loans originated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi‑family
|
|
|
80,923
|
|
|
|
78,873
|
|
|
|
141,625
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
50,847
|
|
|
|
28,282
|
|
|
|
75,302
|
|
SBA Loans
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
7,554
|
|
|
|
39,950
|
|
|
|
29,628
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
17,594
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
26,877
|
|
Total loans originated
|
|
|
157,718
|
|
|
|
162,105
|
|
|
|
273,432
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
69,128
|
|
|
|
47,188
|
|
|
|
153,963
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
975,196
|
|
|
$
|
886,606
|
|
|
$
|
771,689
|
|
(1) |
Amount is before deferred origination costs, purchase premiums and discounts, and the allowance for credit losses.
|
Loan originations are derived from various sources including our loan personnel, local mortgage brokers, and referrals from customers. More than 85% of multi-family loan originations during 2024,
2023 and 2022 were sourced from wholesale loan brokers. All commercial real estate loans, construction loans, commercial loans and SBA loans were derived from our loan personnel, except that we partner with a third-party certified development
company to originate and underwrite certain SBA 504 loans. No single-family or consumer loans were originated during the last three years.
For all loans that we originate, upon receipt of a loan application from a prospective borrower, a credit report is ordered, and certain other information is verified by an independent credit
agency. If necessary, additional financial information is requested. An appraisal of the real estate intended to secure the proposed loan is required to be performed by an independent licensed or certified appraiser designated and approved by
us. The Bank’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) annually reviews our appraisal policy. Management reviews annually the qualifications and performance of independent appraisers that we use.
It is our policy to obtain title insurance on real estate secured loans. Borrowers must also obtain hazard insurance naming the Bank as a loss payee prior to loan closing and they have the option
to escrow for taxes and insurance. If the property is located in a flood zone, the borrower must obtain flood insurance and provide proof of coverage prior to closing.
Each loan requires at least two signatures for approval. The Board has authorized loan approval limits for various management team members up to $7 million per individual, and up to $12 million
for the Chief Executive. Loans in excess of $7 million require review and approval by members of the Director’s Loan Committee.
From time to time, we purchase loans originated by other institutions based upon our investment needs and market opportunities. The determination to purchase specific loans or pools of loans is
subject to our underwriting policies, which consider, among other factors, the financial condition of the borrowers, the location of the underlying collateral properties and the appraised value of the collateral properties. We did not purchase
any loans during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 or 2022.
During 2024 and 2023, we did not originate or sell any loans that were classified as held for sale.
Asset Quality
General
The underlying credit quality of our loan portfolio is dependent primarily on each borrower’s ability to continue to make required loan payments and, in the event a borrower is unable to continue
to do so, the value of the collateral securing the loan, if any. A borrower’s ability to pay, in the case of single-family residential loans and consumer loans, typically is dependent primarily on employment and other sources of income.
Multi‑family and commercial real estate loan borrowers’ ability to pay is typically dependent on the cash flow generated by the property, which in turn is impacted by general economic conditions. Commercial business and SBA loan borrowers’
ability to pay is typically dependent on the successful operation of their businesses or their ability to collect amounts due from their customers. Other factors, such as unanticipated expenditures or changes in the financial markets, may also
impact a borrower’s ability to make loan payments. Collateral values, particularly real estate values, are also impacted by a variety of factors, including general economic conditions, demographics, property maintenance and collection or
foreclosure delays.
Delinquencies
We perform a weekly review of all delinquent loans and a monthly loan delinquency report is made to the Internal Asset Review Committee of the Board. When a borrower fails to make a required
payment on a loan, we take several steps to induce the borrower to cure the delinquency and restore the loan to current status. The procedures we follow with respect to delinquencies vary depending on the type of loan, the type of property
securing the loan, and the period of delinquency. In the case of residential mortgage loans, we generally send the borrower a written notice of non‑payment promptly after the loan becomes past due. In the event payment is not received promptly
thereafter, additional letters are sent, and telephone calls are made. If the loan is still not brought current and it becomes necessary for us to take legal action, we generally commence foreclosure proceedings on all real property securing
the loan. In the case of commercial real estate loans, we generally contact the borrower by telephone and send a written notice of intent to foreclose upon expiration of the applicable grace period. Decisions not to commence foreclosure upon
expiration of the notice of intent to foreclose for commercial real estate loans are made on a case‑by‑case basis. We may consider loan workout arrangements with commercial real estate borrowers in certain circumstances.
The following table shows our loan delinquencies by type and amount at the dates indicated:
|
|
December 31, 2024
|
|
|
December 31, 2023
|
|
|
December 31, 2022
|
|
|
|
Loans delinquent
|
|
|
Loans delinquent
|
|
|
Loans delinquent
|
|
|
|
60-89 Days
|
|
|
90 days or more
|
|
|
60-89 Days
|
|
|
90 days or more
|
|
|
60-89 Days
|
|
|
90 days or more
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Single-family
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
Multi- family
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
SBA loans
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
% of Gross Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
Non‑Performing Assets
Non‑performing assets (“NPAs”) include non‑accrual loans and real estate owned through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure (“REO”). We had one NPA at December 31,
2024 and no NPAs at December 31, 2023. Non-accrual loans consist of delinquent loans that are 90 days or more past due and other loans, including loans modified in response to a borrower’s financial difficulty,
that do not qualify for accrual status.
The following table provides information regarding our non‑performing assets at the dates indicated:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Non‑accrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Church
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
SBA loans
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total non‑accrual loans
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
Loans delinquent 90 days or more and still accruing
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Real estate owned acquired through foreclosure
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total non‑performing assets
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
684
|
|
|
$
|
787
|
|
Non‑accrual loans as a percentage of gross loans, including loans receivable held for sale
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
|
0.22
|
%
|
Non‑performing assets as a percentage of total assets
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
|
0.06
|
%
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
There were no accrual loans that were contractually past due by 90 days or more at December 31, 2024 or 2023. We had no commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans were on
non‑accrual status at December 31, 2024.
We discontinue accruing interest on loans when the loans become 90 days delinquent as to their payment due date (three missed payments). In addition, we reverse all previously accrued and
uncollected interest for those loans through a charge to interest income. While loans are in non‑accrual status, interest received on such loans is credited to principal, until the loans qualify for return to accrual status. Loans are
returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.
Classification of Assets
Federal regulations and our internal policies require that we utilize an asset classification system as a means of monitoring and reporting problem and potential problem assets. We have
incorporated asset classifications as a part of our credit monitoring system and thus classify potential problem assets as “Watch” and “Special Mention,” and problem assets as “Substandard,” “Doubtful” or “Loss.” An asset is considered
“Watch” if the loan is current but temporarily presents higher than average risk and warrants greater than routine attention and monitoring. An asset is considered “Special Mention” if the loan is current but there are some potential
weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. An asset is considered “Substandard” if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or the collateral pledged, if any. “Substandard” assets
include those characterized by the “distinct possibility” that the insured institution will sustain “some loss” if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as “Doubtful” have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified
“Substandard” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make “collection or liquidation in full,” on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, “highly questionable and improbable.” Assets classified as “Loss” are
those considered “uncollectible” and of such little value that their continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific loss allowance is not warranted. Assets which do not currently expose us to sufficient risk to warrant
classification in one of the aforementioned categories, but that are considered to possess some weaknesses, are designated “Special Mention.” Our Internal Asset Review Department reviews and classifies our assets and independently reports the
results of its reviews to the Internal Asset Review Committee of our Board monthly.
The following table provides information regarding our criticized loans (Watch and Special Mention) and classified assets (Substandard) at the dates indicated:
|
|
December 31, 2024
|
|
|
December 31, 2023
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Watch loans
|
|
$
|
141,350
|
|
|
$
|
124,208
|
|
Special mention loans
|
|
|
8,978
|
|
|
|
5,841
|
|
Total criticized loans
|
|
|
150,328
|
|
|
|
130,049
|
|
Substandard loans
|
|
|
59,638
|
|
|
|
21,684
|
|
Total classified assets
|
|
|
59,638
|
|
|
|
21,684
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
209,966
|
|
|
$
|
151,733
|
|
Criticized assets increased to $150.3 million at December 31, 2024, from $130.0 million at December 31, 2023. City First has historically classified all newly originated construction loans as
Watch loans until a history of loan performance can be established or until the construction project is complete, which is the main driver for the increase in total criticized loans of $20.3 million during 2024. In addition, certain loans
were downgraded as part of the internal review process, which also caused the increase in substandard loans of $38.0 million.
Allowance for Credit Losses
In originating loans, we recognize that losses may be experienced on loans and that the risk of loss may vary as a result of many factors, including the type of loan being made, the
creditworthiness of the borrower, general economic conditions and, in the case of a secured loan, the quality of the collateral for the loan. Effective January 1, 2023, the Company accounts for the ACL on loans in accordance with Accounting
Standards Codification Topic 326 (“ASC 326”), which requires the Company to recognize estimates for lifetime losses on loans and off-balance sheet loan commitments at the time of origination or acquisition. The recognition of losses at
origination or acquisition represents the Company’s best estimate of the lifetime expected credit loss associated with a loan, given the facts and circumstances associated with the particular loan, and involves the use of significant
management judgment and estimates, which are subject to change based on management’s on-going assessment of the credit quality of the loan portfolio and changes in economic forecasts used in the model. The Company uses the weighted-average
remaining maturity (“WARM”) method when determining estimates for the ACL for each of its portfolio segments. The weighted average remaining life, including the effect of estimated prepayments, is calculated for each loan pool on a
quarterly basis. The Company then estimates a loss rate for each pool using both its own historical loss experience and the historical losses of a group of peer institutions during the period from 2004 through the most recent quarter.
The Company’s ACL model also includes adjustments for qualitative factors, where appropriate. Qualitative adjustments may include, but are not limited to, factors such as: (i) changes in lending
policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and collections, charge offs, and recovery practices; (ii) changes in international, national, regional, and local conditions; (iii) changes in the nature and volume of the
portfolio and terms of loans; (iv) changes in the experience, depth, and ability of lending management; (v) changes in the volume and severity of past due loans and other similar conditions; (vi) changes in the quality of the organization’s
loan review system; (vii) changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans; (viii) the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the levels of such concentrations; and (ix) the effect of
other external factors (i.e., competition, legal and regulatory requirements) on the level of estimated credit losses. These qualitative factors incorporate the concept of reasonable and supportable forecasts, as required by ASC 326.
The Company has a credit portfolio review process designed to detect problem loans. Problem loans are typically those of a substandard or worse internal risk grade, and may consist of loans on
nonaccrual status, loans that have recently been modified in response to a borrower’s deteriorating financial condition, loans where the likelihood of foreclosure on underlying collateral has increased, collateral dependent loans, and other
loans where concern or doubt over the ultimate collectability of all contractual amounts due has become elevated. Such loans may, in the opinion of management, be deemed to no longer possess risk characteristics similar to other loans in the
loan portfolio, because the specific attributes and risks associated with the loan have likely become unique as the credit quality of the loan deteriorates. As such, these loans may require individual evaluation to determine an appropriate
ACL for the loan. When a loan is individually evaluated, the Company typically measures the expected credit loss for the loan based on the remaining life approach, unless the loan has been deemed collateral dependent. Collateral dependent
loans are loans where the repayment of the loan is expected to come from the operation of and/or eventual liquidation of the underlying collateral. The ACL for collateral dependent loans is determined using estimates of the fair value of the
underlying collateral, less estimated selling costs.
The estimation of the appropriate level of the ACL requires significant judgment by management. Although management uses the best information available to make these estimates, future
adjustments to the ACL may be necessary due to economic, operating, regulatory, and other conditions that may extend beyond the Company’s control. Changes in management’s estimates of forecasted net losses could materially change the level of
the ACL. Additionally, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s ACL and credit review process. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the ACL
based on judgments different from those of management.
The Company has segmented the loan portfolio according to loans that share similar attributes and risk characteristics. Each segment possesses varying degrees of risk based on, among other
things, the type of loan, the type of collateral, and the sensitivity of the borrower or industry to changes in external factors such as economic conditions. The Company determines the ACL for loans based on this more detailed loan
segmentation and classification. These segments, and the risks associated with each segment, are as follows:
Real Estate: Single-Family – Subject to adverse employment conditions in the local economy leading to increased default rate,
decreased market values from oversupply in a geographic area and incremental rate increases on adjustable-rate mortgages which may impact the ability of borrowers to maintain payments.
Real Estate: Multi‑Family – Subject to adverse various market conditions that cause a decrease in market value or lease rates, changes
in personal funding sources for tenants, oversupply of units in a specific region, population shifts and reputational risks.
Real Estate: Commercial Real Estate – Subject to adverse conditions in the local economy which may lead to reduced cash flows due to
vacancies and reduced rental rates, and decreases in the value of underlying collateral.
Real Estate: Church – Subject to adverse economic and employment conditions, which may lead to reduced cash flows from members’
donations and offerings, and the stability, quality, and popularity of church leadership.
Real Estate: Construction – Subject to adverse conditions in the local economy, which may lead to reduced demand for new commercial,
multi‑family, or single-family buildings or reduced lease or sale opportunities once the building is complete.
Commercial and SBA Loans – Subject to industry and economic conditions including decreases in product demand.
Consumer – Subject to adverse employment conditions in the local economy, which may lead to higher default rates.
We determined that an ACL of $8.1 million, or 0.83% of gross loans held for investment, was appropriate at December 31, 2024, compared to the allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) of $7.3
million, or 0.83% of gross loans held for investment at December 31, 2023.
Prior to the Company’s adoption of ASC 326 on January 1, 2023, the Company maintained an ALLL in accordance with ASC 310 and ASC 450 that covered estimated credit losses on individually
evaluated loans that were determined to be impaired, as well as estimated probable incurred losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio.
Beginning on January 1, 2023, the Company evaluates loans collectively for purposes of determining the ACL in accordance with ASC 326. Collective evaluation is based on aggregating loans
deemed to possess similar risk characteristics. In certain instances, the Company may identify loans that it believes no longer possess risk characteristics similar to other loans in the loan portfolio. These loans are typically identified
from those that have exhibited deterioration in credit quality, since the specific attributes and risks associated with such loans tend to become unique as the credit deteriorates. Such loans are typically nonperforming, downgraded to
substandard or worse, and/or are deemed collateral dependent, where the ultimate repayment of the loan is expected to come from the operation of or eventual sale of the collateral. Loans that are deemed by management to no longer possess
risk characteristics similar to other loans in the portfolio, or that have been identified as collateral dependent, are evaluated individually for purposes of determining an appropriate lifetime ACL. The Company uses the remaining life
approach, using the loan’s effective interest rate, for determining the ACL on individually evaluated loans, unless the loan is deemed collateral dependent, which requires evaluation based on the estimated fair value of the underlying
collateral, less estimated selling costs. The Company may increase or decrease the ACL for collateral dependent loans based on changes in the estimated fair value of the collateral.
Prior to the adoption of ASC 326 on January 1, 2023, the Company classified loans as impaired when, based on current information and events, it was probable that the Company would be unable to
collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement or it was determined that the likelihood of the Company receiving all scheduled payments, including interest, when due was remote. Credit losses on impaired
loans were determined separately based on the guidance in ASC 310. Beginning January 1, 2023, the Company accounts for credit losses on all loans in accordance with ASC 326, which eliminates the concept of an impaired loan within the context
of determining credit losses, and requires all loans to be evaluated for credit losses collectively based on similar risk characteristics. Loans are only evaluated individually when they are deemed to no longer possess similar risk
characteristics with other loans in the loan portfolio.
A federally chartered bank’s determination as to the classification of its assets and the amount of its valuation allowances is subject to review by the OCC. The OCC, in conjunction with the
other federal banking agencies, provides guidance for financial institutions on the responsibilities of management for the assessment and establishment of adequate valuation allowances, as well as guidance for banking agency examiners to use
in determining the adequacy of valuation allowances. It is required that all institutions have effective systems and controls to identify, monitor and address asset quality problems, analyze all significant factors that affect the
collectability of the portfolio in a reasonable manner and establish acceptable allowance evaluation processes that meet the objectives of the guidelines issued by federal regulatory agencies. While we believe that the ACL has been
established and maintained at adequate levels, future adjustments may be necessary if economic or other conditions differ materially from the conditions on which we based our estimates at December 31, 2024. In addition, there can be no
assurance that the OCC or other regulators, as a result of reviewing our loan portfolio and/or allowance, will not require us to materially increase our ACL, thereby affecting our financial condition and earnings.
The following table details our allocation of the ACL/ALLL to the various categories of loans held for investment and the percentage of loans in each category to total loans at the dates
indicated:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of loans
in each
category
to total
loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of loans
in each
category
to total
loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of loans
in each
category
to total
loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of loans
in each
category
to total
loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of loans
in each
category
to total
loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
%
|
|
$
|
260
|
|
|
|
2.79
|
%
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
|
3.89
|
%
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
|
6.96
|
%
|
|
$
|
296
|
|
|
|
13.32
|
%
|
Multi‑family
|
|
|
4,568
|
|
|
|
64.94
|
%
|
|
|
4,413
|
|
|
|
63.33
|
%
|
|
|
3,273
|
|
|
|
65.08
|
%
|
|
|
2,657
|
|
|
|
60.36
|
%
|
|
|
2,433
|
|
|
|
75.24
|
%
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
16.01
|
%
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
13.47
|
%
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
14.85
|
%
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
14.29
|
%
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
6.71
|
%
|
Church
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
0.97
|
%
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
1.43
|
%
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
2.04
|
%
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
%
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
8.30
|
%
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
%
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
5.27
|
%
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
4.92
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
Commercial
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
7.24
|
%
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
7.16
|
%
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
8.87
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
10.02
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
SBA loans
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
1.68
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
Consumer
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
Total allowance for credit losses
|
|
$
|
8,103
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,348
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,388
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,391
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,215
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
The following table shows the activity in our ACL/ALLL related to our loans held for investment for the years indicated:
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Allowance balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
7,348
|
|
|
$
|
4,388
|
|
|
$
|
3,391
|
|
|
$
|
3,215
|
|
|
$
|
3,182
|
|
Charge‑offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Church
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
SBA Loans
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total charge‑offs
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Church
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
SBA Loans
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Impact of CECL adoption
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,809
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Credit/loan loss provision (2)
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Allowance balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
8,103
|
|
|
$
|
7,348
|
|
|
$
|
4,388
|
|
|
$
|
3,391
|
|
|
$
|
3,215
|
|
Net charge‑offs (recoveries) to average loans, excluding loans receivable held for sale
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
(0.00
|
%)
|
ACL/ALLL as a percentage of gross loans, excluding loans receivable held for sale (1)
|
|
|
0.83
|
%
|
|
|
0.83
|
%
|
|
|
0.57
|
%
|
|
|
0.52
|
%
|
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
ACL/ALLL as a percentage of total non‑accrual loans
|
|
|
3,069.32
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
|
|
3,047.22
|
%
|
|
|
495.76
|
%
|
|
|
408.51
|
%
|
ACL/ALLL as a percentage of total non‑performing assets
|
|
|
3,069.32
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
|
|
3,047.22
|
%
|
|
|
495.76
|
%
|
|
|
408.51
|
%
|
(1) |
The ACL/ALLL as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 does not include any ACL/ALLL for the remaining balance of loans acquired in the City First Merger, which totaled $5.3 million and $126.8 million,
respectively.
|
(2)
|
The Company also recorded a recovery of provision for off-balance sheet loan commitments of $91 thousand and $2 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023,
respectively.
|
Investment Activities
The main objectives of our investment strategy are to provide a source of liquidity for deposit outflows, repayment of our borrowings and funding loan commitments, and to generate a favorable
return on investments without incurring undue interest rate or credit risk. Subject to various restrictions, our investment policy generally permits investments in money market instruments such as federal funds sold, certificates of deposit
of insured banks and savings institutions, direct obligations of the U.S. Treasury, securities issued by federal and other government agencies and mortgage‑backed securities, mutual funds, municipal obligations, corporate bonds, and
marketable equity securities. Mortgage‑backed securities consist principally of securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Government National Mortgage Association which
are backed by 30‑year amortizing hybrid ARM Loans, structured with fixed interest rates for periods of three to seven years, after which time the loans convert to one‑year or six‑month adjustable rate mortgage loans. At December 31, 2024, our
securities portfolio, consisting primarily of federal agency debt, mortgage‑backed securities, bonds issued by the United States Treasury and the SBA, and municipal bonds, totaled $203.9 million, or 15.6% of total assets.
We classify investments as held‑to‑maturity or available‑for‑sale at the date of purchase based on our assessment of our internal liquidity requirements. Securities purchased to meet
investment‑related objectives such as liquidity management or mitigating interest rate risk and which may be sold as necessary to implement management strategies, are designated as available‑for‑sale at the time of purchase. Securities in the
held‑to‑maturity category consist of securities purchased for long‑term investment in order to enhance our ongoing stream of net interest income. Securities deemed held‑to‑maturity are classified as such because we have both the intent and
ability to hold these securities to maturity. Held‑to‑maturity securities are reported at cost, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount. Available‑for‑sale securities are reported at fair value. We currently have no
securities classified as held‑to‑maturity securities.
The Company’s assessment of available-for-sale investment securities as of December 31, 2024, indicated that an ACL was not required. The Company analyzed available-for-sale investment
securities that were in an unrealized loss position and determined the decline in fair value for those securities was not related to credit, but rather related to changes in interest rates and general market conditions. As such, no ACL was
recorded for available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2024.
The following table sets forth the amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities by type as of the dates indicated. At December 31, 2024, our securities portfolio did not
contain securities of any issuer with an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of our equity capital, excluding those issued by the United States Government or its agencies.
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Federal agency mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
62,853
|
|
|
$
|
53,029
|
|
|
$
|
76,091
|
|
|
$
|
66,778
|
|
|
$
|
84,955
|
|
|
$
|
74,169
|
|
Federal agency collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMO”)
|
|
|
21,299
|
|
|
|
20,058
|
|
|
|
24,720
|
|
|
|
23,339
|
|
|
|
27,776
|
|
|
|
26,100
|
|
Federal agency debt
|
|
|
42,100
|
|
|
|
40,034
|
|
|
|
50,893
|
|
|
|
47,836
|
|
|
|
55,687
|
|
|
|
51,425
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
4,388
|
|
|
|
4,833
|
|
|
|
4,373
|
|
|
|
4,866
|
|
|
|
4,197
|
|
U.S. Treasuries
|
|
|
77,857
|
|
|
|
77,190
|
|
|
|
167,055
|
|
|
|
163,880
|
|
|
|
165,997
|
|
|
|
160,589
|
|
SBA pools
|
|
|
10,749
|
|
|
|
9,163
|
|
|
|
12,386
|
|
|
|
10,744
|
|
|
|
14,048
|
|
|
|
12,269
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
219,658
|
|
|
$
|
203,862
|
|
|
$
|
335,978
|
|
|
$
|
316,950
|
|
|
$
|
353,329
|
|
|
$
|
328,749
|
|
The table below presents the carrying amount, weighted average yields and contractual maturities of our securities as of December 31, 2024. The table reflects stated final maturities and does
not reflect scheduled principal payments or expected payoffs.
|
|
At December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
One year
or less
|
|
|
More than one
year to five years
|
|
|
More than five
years to ten years
|
|
|
More than
ten years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Weighted
average
yield
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Weighted
average
yield
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Weighted
average
yield
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Weighted
average
yield
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Weighted
average
yield
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Available‑for‑sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal agency mortgage‑backed securities
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,355
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,683
|
|
|
|
1.66
|
%
|
|
$
|
43,991
|
|
|
|
2.63
|
%
|
|
$
|
53,029
|
|
|
|
2.46
|
%
|
Federal agency CMO
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
|
|
10,004
|
|
|
|
4.24
|
%
|
|
|
9,694
|
|
|
|
3.33
|
%
|
|
|
20,058
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
%
|
Federal agency debt
|
|
|
12,625
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
%
|
|
|
24,392
|
|
|
|
2.18
|
%
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
5.12
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
40,034
|
|
|
|
2.01
|
%
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
|
4,388
|
|
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
U.S. Treasuries
|
|
|
72,333
|
|
|
|
2.53
|
%
|
|
|
4,857
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
77,190
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
%
|
SBA pools
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
2.70
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
7,498
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
%
|
|
|
9,163
|
|
|
|
2.62
|
%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
84,958
|
|
|
|
2.29
|
%
|
|
$
|
35,544
|
|
|
|
2.19
|
%
|
|
$
|
20,704
|
|
|
|
3.41
|
%
|
|
$
|
62,656
|
|
|
|
2.72
|
%
|
|
$
|
203,862
|
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
Sources of Funds
General
Deposits are our primary source of funds for supporting our lending and other investment activities and general business purposes. In addition to deposits, we obtain funds from the amortization
and prepayment of loans and investment securities, sales of loans and investment securities, advances from the FHLB, and cash flows generated by operations.
Deposits
We offer a variety of deposit accounts featuring a range of interest rates and terms. Our deposits principally consist of savings accounts, checking accounts, interest checking accounts, money
market accounts, and fixed‑term certificates of deposit. The maturities of term certificates generally range from one month to five years. We accept deposits from customers within our market area based primarily on posted rates, but from time
to time we will negotiate the rate based on the amount of the deposit. We primarily rely on customer service and long‑standing customer relationships to attract and retain deposits. We seek to maintain and increase our retail “core” deposit
relationships, consisting of savings accounts, checking accounts and money market accounts because we believe these deposit accounts tend to be a stable funding source and are available at a lower cost than term deposits. However, market
interest rates, including rates offered by competing financial institutions, the availability of other investment alternatives, and general economic conditions significantly affect our ability to attract and retain deposits.
We participate in a deposit program called the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”). CDARS is a deposit placement service that allows us to place our customers’ funds in
FDIC‑insured certificates of deposit at other banks and, at the same time, receive an equal sum of funds from the customers of other banks in the CDARS Network (“CDARS Reciprocal”). These deposits totaled $145.8 million and $114.8 million at
December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively and are not considered to be brokered deposits.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, approximately $268.8 million and $286.4 million, respectively, of our total deposits were not insured by FDIC insurance.
The following table presents the maturity of time deposits as of the dates indicated:
|
|
Three
Months or
Less
|
|
|
Three to Six
Months
|
|
|
Six Months
to One Year
|
|
|
Over One
Year
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits of $250,000 or less
|
|
$
|
46,350
|
|
|
$
|
37,239
|
|
|
$
|
92,028
|
|
|
$
|
4,060
|
|
|
$
|
179,677
|
|
Time deposits of more than $250,000
|
|
|
3,149
|
|
|
|
5,712
|
|
|
|
16,864
|
|
|
|
7,437
|
|
|
|
33,162
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
49,499
|
|
|
$
|
42,951
|
|
|
$
|
108,892
|
|
|
$
|
11,497
|
|
|
$
|
212,839
|
|
Not covered by deposit insurance
|
|
$
|
1,399
|
|
|
$
|
3,212
|
|
|
$
|
12,363
|
|
|
$
|
6,437
|
|
|
$
|
23,411
|
|
December 31, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits of $250,000 or less
|
|
$
|
36,931
|
|
|
$
|
26,248
|
|
|
$
|
63,118
|
|
|
$
|
18,202
|
|
|
$
|
144,499
|
|
Time deposits of more than $250,000
|
|
|
4,609
|
|
|
|
3,904
|
|
|
|
6,895
|
|
|
|
8,128
|
|
|
|
23,536
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
41,540
|
|
|
$
|
30,152
|
|
|
$
|
70,013
|
|
|
$
|
26,330
|
|
|
$
|
168,035
|
|
Not covered by deposit insurance
|
|
$
|
3,109
|
|
|
$
|
2,154
|
|
|
$
|
4,395
|
|
|
$
|
6,628
|
|
|
$
|
16,286
|
|
The following table details the maturity periods of our certificates of deposit in amounts of $100 thousand or more at December 31, 2024.
|
|
December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Certificates maturing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than three months
|
|
$
|
44,010
|
|
|
|
3.34
|
%
|
Three to six months
|
|
|
39,003
|
|
|
|
3.60
|
%
|
Six to twelve months
|
|
|
99,471
|
|
|
|
3.85
|
%
|
Over twelve months
|
|
|
9,301
|
|
|
|
1.26
|
%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
191,785
|
|
|
|
3.56
|
%
|
The following table presents the distribution of our average deposits for the years indicated and the weighted average interest rates during the year for each category of deposits presented.
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Percent
of Total
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Cost of
Funds
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Percent
of Total
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Cost of
Funds
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Percent
of Total
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Cost of
Funds
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Money market deposits
|
|
$
|
284,263
|
|
|
|
48.22
|
%
|
|
|
2.44
|
%
|
|
$
|
262,827
|
|
|
|
45.53
|
%
|
|
|
1.62
|
%
|
|
$
|
192,835
|
|
|
|
28.30
|
%
|
|
|
0.67
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
55,715
|
|
|
|
9.45
|
%
|
|
|
0.67
|
%
|
|
|
59,928
|
|
|
|
10.38
|
%
|
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
|
|
66,033
|
|
|
|
9.69
|
%
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
Interest checking and other demand deposits
|
|
|
74,302
|
|
|
|
12.60
|
%
|
|
|
0.74
|
%
|
|
|
100,248
|
|
|
|
17.37
|
%
|
|
|
0.36
|
%
|
|
|
240,380
|
|
|
|
35.28
|
%
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
175,275
|
|
|
|
29.73
|
%
|
|
|
3.04
|
%
|
|
|
154,275
|
|
|
|
26.72
|
%
|
|
|
1.77
|
%
|
|
|
182,050
|
|
|
|
26.73
|
%
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
589,555
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
|
$
|
577,278
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.30
|
%
|
|
$
|
681,298
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.31
|
%
|
Borrowings
We utilize short‑term and long‑term advances from the FHLB as an alternative to retail deposits as a funding source for asset growth. FHLB advances are generally secured by mortgage loans and
mortgage‑backed securities. Such advances are made pursuant to several different credit programs, each of which has its own interest rate and range of maturities. The maximum amount that the FHLB will advance to member institutions fluctuates
from time to time in accordance with the policies of the FHLB. At December 31, 2024, we had $195.5 million in outstanding FHLB advances and had the ability to borrow up to an additional $174.3 million based on available and pledged
collateral.
The following table summarizes information concerning our FHLB advances at or for the periods indicated:
|
|
At or For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
FHLB Advances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance outstanding during the year
|
|
$
|
199,893
|
|
|
$
|
177,261
|
|
|
$
|
61,593
|
|
Maximum amount outstanding at any month‑end during the year
|
|
$
|
209,298
|
|
|
$
|
210,242
|
|
|
$
|
128,823
|
|
Balance outstanding at end of year
|
|
$
|
195,532
|
|
|
$
|
209,319
|
|
|
$
|
128,344
|
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of year
|
|
|
4.03
|
%
|
|
|
4.91
|
%
|
|
|
3.74
|
%
|
Average cost of advances during the year
|
|
|
4.79
|
%
|
|
|
4.70
|
%
|
|
|
1.74
|
%
|
Weighted average maturity (in months)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
On December 27, 2023, the Bank borrowed $100.0 million from the Federal Reserve under the Bank Term Funding Program (“BTFP”), which was paid off in December 2024. The interest rate on this borrowing was fixed
at 4.84% and the borrowing matured on December 29, 2024. Investment securities with a book value of $107.3 million and a fair value of $98.3 million were pledged as collateral for this borrowing as of December 31, 2023.
The Bank enters into agreements under which it sells securities subject to an obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities. Under these arrangements, the Bank may transfer legal
control over the assets but still retain effective control through an agreement that both entitles and obligates the Bank to repurchase the assets. As a result, these repurchase agreements are accounted for as collateralized financing
agreements (i.e., secured borrowings) and not as a sale and subsequent repurchase of securities. The obligation to repurchase the securities is reflected as a liability in the Bank’s consolidated statements of financial condition, while the
securities underlying the repurchase agreements remain in the respective investment securities asset accounts. In other words, there is no offsetting or netting of the investment securities assets with the repurchase agreement liabilities. As
of December 31, 2024, securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaled $66.6 million at an average rate of 3.62%. These agreements mature on a daily basis. The fair value of securities pledged totaled $83.3 million as of December 31,
2024 and included $46.5 million of U.S. Treasuries, $27.1 million of federal agency debt, $5.5 million of federal agency mortgage-backed securities, and $4.2 million of SBA pools. As of December 31, 2023, securities sold under agreements to
repurchase totaled $73.5 million at an average rate of 2.60%. The fair value of securities pledged totaled $89.0 million as of December 31, 2023 and included $47.8 million of U.S. Treasuries, $30.2 million of federal agency debt, and $11.0
million of federal agency mortgage-backed securities.
We participate in and have previously been an “Allocatee” of the New Markets Tax Credit Program of the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Community Development Financial Institutions Fund. In
connection with the New Market Tax Credit activities of the Bank, CFC 45 is a partnership whose members include CFNMA and City First New Markets Fund II, LLC. In December 2015, a national brokerage firm made a $14.0 million non-recourse loan
to CFC 45, whereby CFC 45 was the beneficiary of the loan from the brokerage firm and passed the proceeds from that loan through to a Qualified Active Low-Income Community Business (“QALICB”). The loan to the QALICB is secured by a Leasehold
Deed of Trust from which the funds for repayment of the loan will be derived. Debt service payments received by CFC 45 from the QALICB are passed through to the brokerage firm, less a servicing fee which is retained by CFC 45. This note was
paid off during January 2024. The financial statements of CFC 45 are consolidated with those of the Bank and the Company.
Market Area and Competition
The Bank is a Community Development Financial Institution (“CDFI”) and a certified B Corp, offering a variety of financial services to meet the needs of the communities it serves. Our retail
banking network includes full-service banking offices, automated teller machines and internet banking capabilities that are available using our website at www.ciytfirstbank.com. We have three banking offices as of December 31, 2024: two in
California (in Los Angeles and in the nearby City of Inglewood) and one in Washington, D.C.
Both the Washington, D.C. and the Los Angeles metropolitan areas are highly competitive banking markets for making loans and attracting deposits. Although our offices are primarily located in
low‑to‑moderate income communities that have historically been under‑served by other financial institutions, we face significant competition for deposits and loans in our immediate market areas, including direct competition from mortgage
banking companies, commercial banks and savings and loan associations. Most of these financial institutions are significantly larger than we are and have greater financial resources, and many have a regional, statewide, or national presence.
Human Capital Management
Human Capital
At City First Bank, N.A., we are a unified, commercial Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI) with a mission-driven approach that advances economic, social, and environmental solutions. Our work is
deeply rooted in creating attractive opportunities for the clients and communities we serve, making them stronger, more resilient places to live and work. We recognize that our employees are our greatest asset. To ensure long-term growth and
sustainability, our human capital strategy is centered on attracting, selecting, retaining, and developing top-tier talent whose personal values align with our organization’s mission and principles.
Culture & Shared Values
Our Shared Values serve as the foundation of our corporate culture, guiding our actions, behaviors, and decision-making. As such, these principles of “Clients and Communities First,” “We Think Big,” “We Model Excellence,” and “ONE City First” shape how we engage with one another, our
customers, and the broader community. Through a shared commitment to impact-driven financial services, our employees collaborate with mission-aligned partners to support affordable housing, charter schools, community health centers,
nonprofits, and small to medium-sized businesses in under invested and low- and moderate-income communities. We are intentional about fostering a purpose-driven workplace, where employees feel empowered, valued, and connected to the greater
mission and purpose of the organization.
Our legacy and history matter at City First. We are proud of our expanded 75-year history with the merger with Broadway Federal. Our founders in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. were local leaders who saw a
need in the community for a bank that addressed the lack of access to capital for under invested communities. Our ownership, responsibility, and commitment to these Shared Values and legacy is reflected in the composition of our workforce,
executive leadership team, and Board.
Workforce Learning & Development
We are dedicated to cultivating a culture of continuous learning and professional growth where employees can learn, grow, and be fulfilled in the work that they do. Our learning & development strategy
provides employees with the tools, training, and experiences they need to excel in their roles and advance within the organization. Key initiatives include:
|
• |
Structured Onboarding & Role-Specific Training to ensure new hires and internal transitions are set up for success.
|
|
• |
Leadership Development Programs designed to identify and cultivate future leaders within the organization.
|
|
• |
Skills-Based Learning through digital learning platforms, workshops, and external partnerships.
|
|
• |
Mentorship & Career Pathing to support employees in navigating career progression within the company.
|
Our commitment to workforce development ensures that our employees not only contribute to the success of the organization but also grow personally and professionally.
Total Rewards & Employee Well-Being
We provide a comprehensive Total Rewards program designed to support the well-being and financial security of our employees. Our offerings include:
|
• |
Competitive Compensation & Incentives aligned with market benchmarks and performance outcomes.
|
|
• |
Comprehensive Health & Wellness Benefits, including medical, dental, and vision coverage, as well as mental health and wellness initiatives.
|
|
• |
Retirement & Financial Security programs, including a 401(k) with employer matching contributions.
|
|
• |
Paid Time Off & Work-Life Balance initiatives, including generous PTO, parental leave, and flexible work arrangements.
|
|
• |
Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) and wellness initiatives to support physical, mental, and financial well-being.
|
Our Total Rewards philosophy ensures that our employees feel valued, supported, and motivated to contribute to the organization’s success while maintaining a strong sense of personal and financial well-being.
Governance & Workforce Overview
Our Board provides strategic oversight of our human capital management, ensuring alignment with the organization’s long-term objectives. The Human Resources team leads the execution of our talent strategy,
workforce planning, employee engagement, and organizational development initiatives. As of December 31, 2024, we employed 106 full-time employees across our corporate offices, branch locations, and operational facilities. Our primary offices
are located in Los Angeles, California, and Washington, D.C., with additional employees working remotely in various locations across the United States.
Regulation
General
City First and Broadway Financial Corporation are subject to comprehensive regulation and supervision by several different federal agencies. City First is regulated by the OCC as its primary
federal regulator. The Bank’s deposits generally are insured up to a maximum of $250,000 per account; the Bank also is regulated by the FDIC as its deposit insurer. The Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System and is subject to certain
regulations of the FRB, including, for example, regulations concerning reserves required to be maintained against deposits and regulations governing transactions with affiliates, Broadway Financial Corporation is regulated, examined, and
supervised by the FRB and the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (“FRBR”) and is also required to file certain reports and otherwise comply with the rules and regulations of the SEC under the federal securities laws. The Bank also is subject to
consumer protection regulations promulgated by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”).
The OCC regulates and examines the Bank’s business activities, including, among other things, capital standards, investment authority and permissible activities, deposit taking and borrowing
authority, mergers and other business combination transactions, establishment of branch offices, and the structure and permissible activities of any subsidiaries of the Bank. The OCC has primary enforcement responsibility over national banks
and has substantial discretion to impose enforcement actions on an institution that fails to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, including capital requirements, or that engages in practices that examiners determine to be unsafe or
unsound. In addition, the FDIC has “back-up” enforcement authority that enables it to recommend enforcement action to the OCC with respect to a national bank and, if the recommended action is not taken by the OCC, to take such action under
certain circumstances. In certain cases, the OCC has the authority to refer matters relating to federal fair lending laws to the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) or the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) if the OCC
determines violations of the fair lending laws may have occurred.
Changes in applicable laws or the regulations of the OCC, the FDIC, the FRB, the CFPB, or other regulatory authorities, or changes in interpretations of such regulations or in agency policies or
priorities, could have a material adverse impact on the Bank and our Company, our operations, and the value of our debt and equity securities. We and our stock are also subject to rules issued by The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”), the
stock exchange on which our voting common stock is traded. Failure to conform to Nasdaq’s rules could have an adverse impact on us and the value of our equity securities.
The following paragraphs summarize certain laws and regulations that apply to the Company and the Bank. These descriptions of statutes and regulations and their possible effects do not purport
to be complete descriptions of all the provisions of those statutes and regulations and their possible effects on us, nor do they purport to identify every statute and regulation that applies to us. In addition, the statutes and regulations
that apply to the Company and the Bank are subject to change, which can affect the scope and cost of their compliance obligations.
Dodd‑Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
In July 2010, the Dodd‑Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd‑Frank Act”) was signed into law. The Dodd‑Frank Act is intended to address perceived weaknesses in the U.S.
financial regulatory system and prevent future economic and financial crises.
The Dodd‑Frank Act established increased compliance obligations across a number of areas in the banking business. In particular, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the federal banking agencies
(comprising the FRB, the OCC, and the FDIC) substantially revised their consolidated and bank-level risk‑based and leverage capital requirements applicable to insured depository institutions, depository institution holding companies and
certain non‑bank financial companies. Under an existing FRB policy statement, bank holding companies with less than $3 billion in total consolidated assets are not subject to consolidated capital requirements provided they satisfy the
conditions in the policy statement. The Dodd‑Frank Act requires bank holding companies to serve as a source of financial strength for any subsidiary of the holding company that is a depository institution by providing financial assistance in
the event of the financial distress of the depository institution.
The Dodd‑Frank Act also established the CFPB. The CFPB has broad rule‑making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to banks and savings institutions of all sizes,
including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. At times during the past several years, the CFPB has been active in bringing enforcement actions against banks and nonbank financial institutions to
enforce federal consumer financial laws and has developed a number of new enforcement theories and applications of these laws. The CFPB’s supervisory authority does not generally extend to insured depository institutions, such as the Bank,
that have less than $10 billion in assets. The federal banking agencies, however, have authority to examine for compliance, and bring enforcement action for non-compliance, with respect to the CFPB’s regulations. State attorneys general and
state banking agencies and other state financial regulators also may have authority to enforce applicable consumer laws with respect to institutions over which they have jurisdiction.
Capital Requirements
The Bank’s capital requirements are administered by the OCC and involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under applicable regulatory
accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the OCC. Failure to meet capital requirements can result in regulatory action.
As a result of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, the federal banking agencies have developed a “Community Bank Leverage Ratio” (“CBLR”) (the ratio of a bank’s
tier 1 capital to average total consolidated assets) for financial institutions with assets of less than $10 billion. A “qualifying community bank” that exceeds this ratio will be deemed to be in compliance with all other capital and leverage
requirements, including the capital requirements to be considered “well capitalized” under Prompt Corrective Action statutes. The federal banking agencies have set the Community Bank Leverage Ratio at 9%. Actual and required capital amounts
and ratios as of the dates indicated are presented below:
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Minimum Required to be
Well Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
December 31, 2024:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank Leverage Ratio
|
|
$
|
189,009
|
|
|
|
13.96
|
%
|
|
$
|
121,897
|
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
December 31, 2023:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank Leverage Ratio
|
|
$
|
185,773
|
|
|
|
14.97
|
%
|
|
$
|
111,696
|
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
At December 31, 2024, the Company and the Bank met all the capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject. In addition, the Bank was “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework
for prompt corrective action. Management believes that no conditions or events have occurred that would materially adversely change the Bank’s capital classifications. From time to time, we may need to raise additional capital to support the
Bank’s further growth and to maintain the “well capitalized” status.
Deposit Insurance
The FDIC is an independent federal agency that insures deposits of federally insured banks, including national banks, up to prescribed statutory limits for each depositor. Pursuant to the
Dodd‑Frank Act, the maximum deposit insurance amount has been permanently increased to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category.
The FDIC charges an annual assessment for the insurance of deposits based on the risk a particular institution poses to the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”). The Bank’s DIF assessment is
calculated by multiplying its assessment rate by the assessment base, which is defined as the average consolidated total assets less the average tangible equity of the Bank. The initial base assessment rate is based on an institution’s
capital level, and capital adequacy, asset quality, management, earnings, liquidity, and sensitivity (“CAMELS”) ratings, certain financial measures to assess an institution’s ability to withstand asset related stress and funding related
stress, and in some cases, additional discretionary adjustments by the FDIC to reflect additional risk factors.
The FDIC’s overall premium rate structure is subject to change from time to time to reflect its actual and anticipated loss experience. The financial crisis that began in 2008 resulted in
substantially higher levels of bank failures than had occurred in the immediately preceding years. These failures dramatically increased the resolution costs incurred by the FDIC and substantially reduced the available amount of the DIF.
Consistent with the requirements of the Dodd‑Frank Act, the FDIC adopted its most recent DIF restoration plan in September 2020; that plan is designed to enable the FDIC to achieve the
statutorily required reserve ratio of 1.35% by September 30, 2028. The FDIC Board has set the designated reserve ratio for each of the years 2024 and 2023 at 2%. The statute provides that in setting the amount of assessments necessary to meet
the designated reserve ratio requirement, the FDIC is required to offset the effect of this provision on insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion, so that more of the cost of raising the reserve
ratio will be borne by institutions with more than $10 billion in assets. Accordingly, the FDIC has provided assessment credits to insured depository institutions, like the Bank, with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion for the
portion of their regular assessments that contribute to growth in the reserve ratio between 1.15% and 1.35%. The FDIC has applied the credits each quarter that the reserve ratio was at least 1.38% to offset the regular deposit insurance
assessments of institutions with credits. The Bank did not receive any assessment credits during 2024 or 2023.
Although it rarely does so, the FDIC has the authority to terminate a depository institution’s deposit insurance upon a finding that the institution’s financial condition is unsafe or unsound or
that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices that pose a risk to the DIF or that may prejudice the interest of a bank’s depositors.
Guidance on Commercial Real Estate Lending
In December 2015, the federal banking agencies released a statement titled “Statement on Prudent Risk Management for Commercial Real Estate Lending” (the “CRE Statement”). The CRE Statement
expresses the banking agencies’ concerns with banking institutions that ease their commercial real estate underwriting standards, directs financial institutions to maintain underwriting discipline and exercise risk management practices to
identify, measure and monitor lending risks, and indicates that the agencies will continue to pay special attention to commercial real estate lending activities and concentrations going forward. The banking agencies previously issued guidance
titled “Prudent Commercial Real Estate Loan Workouts” which provides guidance for financial institutions that are working with commercial real estate (“CRE”) borrowers who are experiencing diminished operating cash flows, depreciated
collateral values, or prolonged delays in selling or renting commercial properties and details risk‑management practices for loan workouts that support prudent and pragmatic credit and business decision‑making within the framework of
financial accuracy, transparency, and timely loss recognition. The banking agencies had also issued previous guidance titled “Interagency Guidance on Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate” stating that a banking institution will be
considered to be potentially exposed to significant CRE concentration risk, and should employ enhanced risk management practices, if total CRE loans represent 300% or more of its total capital and the outstanding balance of the institution’s
CRE loan portfolio has increased by 50% or more during the preceding 36 months.
In October 2009, the federal banking agencies adopted a policy statement supporting workouts of CRE loans, which is referred to as the “CRE Policy Statement.” The CRE Policy Statement provides
guidance for examiners, and for financial institutions that are working with CRE borrowers who are experiencing diminished operating cash flows, depreciated collateral values, or prolonged delays in selling or renting commercial properties.
The CRE Policy Statement details risk‑management practices for loan workouts that support prudent and pragmatic credit and business decision‑making within the framework of financial accuracy, transparency, and timely loss recognition. The CRE
Policy Statement states that financial institutions that implement prudent loan workout arrangements after performing comprehensive reviews of the financial condition of borrowers will not be subject to criticism for engaging in these
efforts, even if the restructured loans have weaknesses that result in adverse credit classifications. In addition, performing loans, including those renewed or restructured on reasonable modified terms, made to creditworthy borrowers, will
not be subject to adverse classification solely because the value of the underlying collateral declined. The CRE Policy Statement reiterates existing guidance that examiners are expected to take a balanced approach in assessing an
institution’s risk‑management practices for loan workout activities.
In October 2018, the OCC provided Broadway Federal with a letter of “no supervisory objection” permitting it to increase the non‑multi-family commercial real estate loan concentration limit to
100% of Tier 1 Capital plus ALLL, including a sublimit of 50% for land/construction loans, which brought the total CRE loan concentration limit to 600% of Tier 1 Capital plus ALLL.
Loans to One Borrower
The Bank is in compliance with the statutory and regulatory limits applicable to loans to any one borrower. As of December 31, 2024, the lending limit for City First is $30.9 million. At
December 31, 2024, our largest loan to a single borrower was $15.7 million; that loan was performing in accordance with its terms and was otherwise in compliance with regulatory requirements.
Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending
The Community Reinvestment Act, as implemented by OCC regulations (“CRA”), requires each national bank to make efforts to meet the credit needs of the communities it serves, including low‑ and
moderate‑income neighborhoods. The CRA requires the OCC to assess an institution’s performance in meeting the credit needs of its communities as part of its examination of the institution, and to take such assessments into consideration in
reviewing applications for mergers, acquisitions, and other transactions. An unsatisfactory CRA rating may be the basis for denying an application. Community groups have successfully protested applications on CRA grounds. In connection with
the assessment of a savings institution’s CRA performance, the OCC assigns ratings of “outstanding,” “satisfactory,” “needs to improve” or “substantial noncompliance.” The Company’s CRA performance was rated by the OCC as “outstanding” in
their most recent CRA examination which was completed in 2022.
The Bank is also subject to federal fair lending laws, including the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”) and the Federal Housing Act (“FHA”), which prohibit discrimination in credit and
residential real estate transactions on prohibited bases, including race, color, national origin, gender, and religion, among others. A lender may be liable under one or both acts in the event of overt discrimination, disparate treatment, or
a disparate impact on a prohibited basis. The compliance of national banks with these acts is primarily supervised and enforced by the OCC. If the OCC determines that a lender has engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination in
violation of ECOA, the OCC refers the matter to the DOJ. Similarly, HUD is notified of violations of the FHA.
The USA PATRIOT Act, Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”), and
Anti‑Money Laundering (“AML”) Requirements
The USA PATRIOT Act was enacted after September 11, 2001 to provide the federal government with powers to prevent, detect, and prosecute terrorism and international money laundering, and has
resulted in the promulgation of several regulations that have a direct impact on savings associations. Financial institutions must have a number of programs in place to comply with this law, including: (i) a program to manage BSA/AML risk;
(ii) a customer identification program designed to determine the true identity of customers, document and verify the information, and determine whether the customer appears on any federal government list of known or suspected terrorists or
terrorist organizations; and (iii) a program for monitoring for the timely detection and reporting of suspicious activity and reportable transactions. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in regulatory action, including the
issuance of cease and desist orders, impositions of civil money penalties and adverse changes in an institution’s regulatory ratings, which could adversely affect its ability to obtain regulatory approvals for business combinations or other
desired business objectives.
Privacy Protection
City First is subject to OCC regulations implementing the privacy protection provisions of federal law. These regulations require the Bank to disclose its privacy policy, including identifying
with whom it shares “nonpublic personal information,” to customers at the time of establishing the customer relationship and annually thereafter. The regulations also require City First to provide its customers with initial and annual notices
that accurately reflect its privacy policies and practices. In addition, to the extent its sharing of such information is not covered by an exception, the Bank is required to provide its customers with the ability to “opt‑out” of having City
First share their nonpublic personal information with unaffiliated third parties.
City First is also subject to regulatory guidelines establishing standards for safeguarding customer information. The guidelines describe the agencies’ expectations for the creation,
implementation, and maintenance of an information security program, which would include administrative, technical, and physical safeguards appropriate to the size and complexity of the institution and the nature and scope of its activities.
The standards set forth in the guidelines are intended to promote the security and confidentiality of customer records and information, protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such records and
protect against unauthorized access to or use of such records or information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer.
Bank Holding Company Regulation
As a bank holding company, we are subject to the supervision, regulation, and examination of the FRB and the FRBR. In addition, the FRB has enforcement authority over the Company. Applicable
statutes and regulations administered by the FRB place certain restrictions on our activities and investments. Among other things, we are generally prohibited, either directly or indirectly, from acquiring more than 5% of the voting shares of
any depository or depository holding company that is not a subsidiary of the Company.
The Change in Bank Control Act prohibits a person, acting directly or indirectly or in concert with one or more persons, from acquiring control of a bank holding company unless the FRB has been
given 60 days prior written notice of such proposed acquisition and within that time period the FRB has not issued a notice disapproving the proposed acquisition or extending for up to another 30 days the period during which a disapproval may
be issued. The term “control” is defined for this purpose to include ownership or control of, or holding with power to vote, 25% or more of any class of a bank holding company’s voting securities. Under a rebuttable presumption contained in
the regulations of the FRB, ownership or control of, or holding with power to vote, 10% or more of any class of voting securities of a bank company will be deemed control for purposes of the Change in Bank Control Act if the institution (i)
has registered securities under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, or (ii) no person will own, control, or have the power to vote a greater percentage of that class of voting securities immediately after the transaction. In addition, any company
acting directly or indirectly or in concert with one or more persons or through one or more subsidiaries would be required to obtain the approval of the FRB under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, before acquiring control of a
bank holding company. For this purpose, a company is deemed to have control of a bank holding company if the company (i) owns, controls, holds with power to vote, or holds proxies representing, 25% or more of any class of voting shares of the
holding company, (ii) contributes more than 25% of the holding company’s capital, (iii) controls in any manner the election of a majority of the holding company’s directors, or (iv) directly or indirectly exercises a controlling influence
over the management or policies of the national bank or other company. The FRB may also determine, based on the relevant facts and circumstances, that a company has otherwise acquired control of a bank holding company.
Restrictions on Dividends and Other Capital Distributions
In general, the prompt corrective action regulations prohibit a national bank from declaring any dividends, making any other capital distribution, or paying a management fee to a controlling
person, such as its parent holding company, if, following the distribution or payment, the institution would be within any of the three undercapitalized categories set out in the regulations. In addition to the prompt corrective action
restriction on paying dividends, OCC regulations limit certain “capital distributions” by national banks. Capital distributions are defined to include, among other things, dividends and payments for stock repurchases and payments of cash to
stockholders in mergers.
Under the OCC capital distribution regulations, a national bank that is a subsidiary of a bank holding company must notify the OCC at least 30 days prior to the declaration of any capital
distribution by its national bank subsidiary. The 30‑day period provides the OCC an opportunity to object to the proposed dividend if it believes that the dividend would not be advisable.
An application to the OCC for approval to pay a dividend is required if: (i) the total of all capital distributions made during that calendar year (including the proposed distribution) exceeds
the sum of the institution’s year‑to‑date net income and its retained income for the preceding two years; (ii) the institution is not entitled under OCC regulations to “expedited treatment” (which is generally available to institutions the
OCC regards as well run and adequately capitalized); (iii) the institution would not be at least “adequately capitalized” following the proposed capital distribution; or (iv) the distribution would violate an applicable statute, regulation,
agreement, or condition imposed on the institution by the OCC.
The Bank’s ability to pay dividends to the Company is also subject to a restriction if the Bank’s regulatory capital would be reduced below the amount required for the liquidation account
established in connection with the conversion of the Bank from the mutual to the stock form of organization.
See Item 5 “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities” for a further description of dividend and other capital distribution
limitations to which the Company and the Bank are subject.
Tax Matters
Federal Income Taxes
We report our income on a calendar year basis using the accrual method of accounting and are subject to federal income taxation in the same manner as other corporations. See Note 14 “Income
Taxes” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a further description of tax matters applicable to our business.
California Taxes
As a bank holding company filing California franchise tax returns on a combined basis with its subsidiaries, the Company is subject to California franchise tax at the rate applicable to
“financial corporations.” The applicable statutory tax rate is 10.84%.
Washington, D.C. Taxes
As a bank holding company filing Washington, D.C. franchise tax returns on a combined basis with its subsidiaries, the Company is subject to Washington, D.C. franchise tax at the rate applicable
to “financial corporations.” The applicable statutory tax rate is 8.25%.
We are exposed to a variety of risks, some of which are inherent to the financial services industry and others of which are more specific to our businesses. The discussion
below addresses material factors, of which we are currently aware, that could have a material and adverse effect on our businesses, results of operations, and financial condition. Moreover, some of the factors, events and contingencies
discussed below may have occurred in the past, but the disclosures below are not representations as to whether or not the factors, events or contingencies have occurred in the past, and instead reflect our beliefs and opinions as to the
factors, events, or contingencies that could materially and adversely affect us in the future. These risk factors and other forward-looking statements that relate to future events, expectations, trends and operating periods involve certain
factors that are subject to change, and important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. These risks and uncertainties should not be considered a complete discussion of all the risks and uncertainties
that we might face. Although the risks are organized by headings and each risk is discussed separately, many are interrelated.
Risks Relating to Our Business
The macroeconomic environment could pose significant challenges for the Company and could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Inflation poses risk to the economy overall and could indirectly pose challenges to our clients and to our business. Elevated inflation can impact our business customers through loss of
purchasing power for their customers, leading to lower sales. Rising inflation can also increase input and inventory costs for our customers, forcing them to raise their prices or lower their profitability. Supply chain disruption, also
leading to inflation, can delay our customers’ shipping ability, or timing on receiving inputs for their production or inventory. Inflation can lead to higher wages for our commercial customers, increasing costs. All of these inflationary
risks for our commercial customer base can be financially detrimental, leading to increased likelihood that the customer may default on a loan.
For example, sustained inflationary pressure led the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates seven times in 2022, and four times in 2023, which increased our interest rate risk. Analysts
have been monitoring the level of uninsured deposits in banks due to the liquidity risk associated with high levels of uninsured deposits. To the extent such conditions exist or worsen, we could experience
adverse effects on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Additionally, financial markets may be adversely affected by the current or anticipated impact of military conflict, including hostilities between Russia and Ukraine and the conflict in the Middle East, terrorism,
or other geopolitical events.
Our future success will depend on our ability to compete effectively in the highly competitive financial services industry in the greater Washington, D.C. and Los Angeles
metropolitan areas.
We face strong competition in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and the Southern California Market. We compete with many different types of financial institutions, including commercial
banks, credit unions, savings and loan associations, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, insurance companies, and money market funds, as well as other local and community, super-regional, national, and international financial
institutions that operate offices in our primary market areas and elsewhere. Our future growth and success will depend on our ability to compete effectively in this highly competitive financial services environment. Many of our competitors in
the greater Washington, D.C. and Los Angeles metropolitan areas are well-established, larger financial institutions that have greater name recognition and market presence that benefit them in attracting business. Failure to compete
effectively and to attract new or to retain existing clients may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, assets, or business.
A downturn in the real estate market could seriously impair our loan portfolio and operating results.
Most of our loan portfolio consists of loans secured by various types of real estate located in Southern California and in Washington, D.C., and surrounding areas. If economic factors cause real
estate values in the markets we serve to decline, higher vacancies to occur, or the deterioration of other factors, then the financial condition of the Bank’s borrowers could be harmed, and the collateral for loans will provide less security.
In addition, a decline in real estate values in the regions served could result in the Bank experiencing increases in loan delinquencies and defaults, which result in increases in the amounts of nonperforming assets and which would likely
cause the Bank to suffer losses.
Our allowance for credit losses may not be adequate to cover actual loan losses.
Our provision for credit losses is based on estimates of expected lifetime credit losses for loans at the time of origination which may not cover actual future credit losses. Management
utilizes a variety of inputs in the calculation of its estimate, including historical losses based on peer data, economic conditions and trends, the value and adequacy of collateral, volume and mix of the portfolio, and internal loan
processes. We use historical loss data provided by our third-party service provider in the calculation of our ACL which may not approximate our own historical loss data. Our ability to accurately forecast and react to future losses may be
impaired by significant uncertainties which could result in loan losses and other exposures that could exceed our allowance. Furthermore, if the models, estimates and assumptions we use to establish our ACL or the judgments we make in
extending credit to our borrowers prove inaccurate in predicting future events, the result may also be losses in excess of our ACL. As economic conditions change, we may have to increase our ACL, which could adversely affect our results of
operations, earnings, and financial condition.
Changes in interest rates affect profitability.
Changes in prevailing interest rates adversely affect our business. We derive income mainly from the difference or “spread” between the interest earned on loans, securities and
other interest-earning assets, and interest paid on deposits, borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities. In general, the wider the spread, the more we will earn. When market rates of interest change, the interest the Bank receives
on assets and the interest paid on liabilities will fluctuate. In addition, the timing and rate of change in the interest that the Bank earns on assets do not necessarily match the timing and rate of change in the interest that it must pay
on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities, even though most of the loans have adjustable-rate features. This causes increases or decreases in the spread and can greatly affect income. When the
interest rates paid on deposits and borrowings increase faster than the interest rates earned on loans and securities, the Bank’s spread decreases which has a negative impact on profitability. Also, the carrying value of our
available-for-sale investment portfolio will continue to decrease due to increases in interest rates. In addition, interest rate fluctuations can affect how much money the Bank may be able to lend and its ability to attract and retain
customer deposits, which are an important source of funds for making and holding loans.
Changes in governmental regulation may impair operations or restrict growth.
We are subject to substantial governmental supervision and regulation, which are intended primarily for the protection of depositors rather than our stockholders. Statutes and regulations
affecting our business may be changed at any time, and the interpretation of existing statutes and regulations by examining authorities may also change. Within the last several years, Congress and the federal bank regulatory authorities have
made significant changes to these statutes and regulations. There can be no assurance that such changes to the statutes and regulations or in their interpretation will not adversely affect our business. Moreover, as a community bank operating
as a Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI), we face a complex and evolving regulatory and political landscape, and changes in laws, regulations, initiatives, or regulatory policies could adversely affect our business, financial
condition, and results of operations. We are also subject to changes in other federal and state laws, including changes in tax laws, which could materially affect the banking industry. If we fail to comply with federal bank regulations, our
regulators may limit our activities or growth, assess civil money penalties against us or place the Bank into conservatorship or receivership. Bank regulations can hinder our ability to compete with financial services companies that are not
regulated or are less regulated.
Negative public opinion regarding us or the failure to maintain our reputation in the communities we serve could adversely affect our business and prevent us from growing our
business.
Our reputation within the communities we serve is critical to our success. We believe we have built strong personal and professional relationships with our customers and are an active member of
the communities we serve. If our reputation is negatively affected, including as a result of actions of our employees or otherwise, we may be less successful in attracting new customers or talent or may lose existing customers, and our
business, financial condition and earnings could be adversely affected.
We may not be successful in retaining key employees.
Our success will depend in part on its ability to retain the talents and dedication of key employees. If key employees unexpectedly terminate their employment, our business activities may be
adversely affected and management’s attention may be diverted from successfully integrating operating our business to hiring suitable replacements, which may cause our business to suffer. In addition, we may not be able to identify or recruit
suitable replacements in a timely manner if at all for any key employees who leave the Company.
General Risk Factors
Ineffective internal control over financial reporting could affect our ability to record, process, and report financial
information accurately, impair our ability to prepare financial statements, negatively affect investor confidence, and cause reputational harm.
Effective internal controls are necessary for the Company to provide reliable and accurate financial reporting and financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could lead to violations, unintentional or otherwise, of laws and regulations. As
disclosed in Part I, Item 4 “Controls and Procedures,” of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2023, we determined that there were material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. We have
determined that the material weaknesses were remediated and that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2024. If the additional controls and procedures that we have implemented to remediate the material
weaknesses prove to be insufficient or we identify other control deficiencies that individually or together constitute significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, the Company’s ability to record, process, and report financial information
accurately, and to prepare financial statements within required time periods, could be adversely affected. Litigation, government investigations, or regulatory enforcement actions arising out of any such failure or alleged failure could
subject us to civil and criminal penalties that could materially and adversely affect our reputation, financial condition, and operating results. Similarly, the control deficiency, remediation efforts, and any related litigation, government
investigations, or regulatory enforcement actions will require management attention and resources and cause us to incur unanticipated costs, and could negatively affect investor confidence in our financial statements, cause us reputational
harm, and raise other risks to our operations.
Our failure to meet the continued listing requirements of Nasdaq could result in a delisting of our common stock, which would negatively impact the market price and liquidity of our common stock
and our ability to access the capital markets.
If we fail to satisfy the continued listing requirements of Nasdaq, such as the $1.00 minimum closing bid price or timely periodic financial reporting requirements, Nasdaq may take steps to
delist the Company’s securities. For example, on May 14, 2024, we received a Staff Delisting Determination letter (the “Staff Determination”) from Nasdaq that it had initiated the delisting process with respect to the Company’s securities.
Following the filing of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023 and Annual Report on From 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, we received a letter from Nasdaq on May 20, 2024,
stating that the Company had regained compliance with Nasdaq continued listing requirements and the matter was closed. Any delisting of the Company’s securities, or threat of such delisting, would have a negative effect on the price of our
common stock, impair the ability to sell or purchase our common stock when persons wish to do so, and any delisting materially adversely affect our ability to raise capital or pursue financing or other transactions on acceptable terms, or at
all. Delisting from the Nasdaq Capital Market could also have other negative results, including the potential loss of institutional investor interest and fewer business development opportunities. In the event of a delisting, we would attempt
to take actions to restore our compliance with Nasdaq’s listing requirements, but we can provide no assurance that any such action taken by us would allow our common stock to become listed again, stabilize the market price or improve the
liquidity of our common stock, prevent our common stock from dropping below the Nasdaq minimum bid price requirement or prevent future non-compliance with Nasdaq’s listing requirements.
The market price of our common stock is volatile. Stockholders may not be able to resell shares of our common stock at times or at prices they find attractive.
The trading price of our common stock has historically and will likely in the future fluctuate significantly as a result of a number of factors, including the following:
|
● |
actual or anticipated changes in our operating results and financial condition;
|
|
● |
actions by our stockholders, including sales of common stock by substantial stockholders and/or directors and executive officers, or perceptions that such actions may occur;
|
|
● |
the limited number of shares of our common stock that are held by the general public, commonly called the “public float,” and our small market capitalization;
|
|
● |
failure to meet stockholder or market expectations regarding loan and deposit volume, revenue, asset quality or earnings;
|
|
● |
failure to meet Nasdaq listing requirements, including failure to satisfy the $1.00 minimum closing bid price requirement;
|
|
● |
speculation in the press or the investment community relating to the Company or the financial services industry generally;
|
|
● |
fluctuations in the stock price and operating results of our competitors;
|
|
● |
proposed or adopted regulatory changes or developments;
|
|
● |
investigations, proceedings, or litigation that involve or affect us;
|
|
● |
the performance of the national, California and Washington, D.C. economies and the real estate markets in Southern California and Washington, D.C.;
|
|
● |
general market conditions and, in particular, developments related to market conditions for the financial services industry;
|
|
● |
additions or departures of key personnel;
|
|
● |
changes in financial estimates or publication of research reports and recommendations by financial analysts with respect to our common stock or those of other financial institutions; and
|
|
● |
actions taken by bank regulatory authorities, including required additions to our loan loss reserves or the issuance of cease and desist orders, based on adverse evaluations of our loans and other assets,
operating results, or management practices and procedures or other aspects of our business.
|
We have not paid cash dividends on our common stock since 2010 and we may not pay any cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future.
We have not declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock since June 2010, initially due, in part, to regulatory restrictions and the operating losses we have previously experienced. We
have not determined to pay cash dividends on our common stock at any time in the near future.
Stock sales by us or other dilution of our equity may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
The issuance of additional shares of our common stock, or securities that are convertible into our common stock, may be determined to be necessary or advisable at times when our stock price is
below book value, which could be substantially dilutive to existing holders of our common stock. The market value of our common stock could also decline as a result of sales by us of a large number of shares of our common stock or any future
class or series of stock or the perception that such sales could occur.
Anti-takeover provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, federal and state law and our stockholder rights plan may limit the ability of another party to
acquire the Company, which could depress our stock price.
Various provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and certain other actions that we have taken could delay or prevent a third-party from acquiring control of the Company even if
such a transaction might be considered beneficial by our stockholders. These include, among others, our classified board of directors, the fact that directors may only be removed for cause, advance notice requirements for stockholder
nominations of director candidates or presenting proposals at our annual stockholder meetings, super-majority stockholder voting requirements for amendments to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, and for certain business combination
transactions, and the authorization to issue “blank check” preferred stock by action of our board of directors, without obtaining stockholder approval. In addition, we approved a stockholder rights plan in September 2019, the purpose of which
was to protect our stockholders against the possibility of attempts to acquire control of or influence over the Company through open market or privately negotiated purchases of our common stock without payment of a fair price to all of our
stockholders or through other tactics that do not provide fair treatment to all stockholders. These provisions and the stockholder rights plan could be used by our board of directors to prevent a merger or acquisition that would be attractive
to stockholders and could limit the price investors would be willing to pay in the future for our common stock.
Our common stock is not insured and stockholders could lose the value of their entire investment.
An investment in shares of our common stock is not a deposit and is not insured against loss or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) or any other government
agency or authority.
If we were to lose our status as a CDFI, our ability to obtain grants and awards as a CDFI similar to those received in the past may be lost.
The Bank and the Company are certified as CDFIs by the United States Department of the Treasury. CDFI status increases a financial institution’s potential for receiving grants and awards that,
in turn, enable the financial institution to increase the level of community development financial services that it provides to communities. Broadway Federal Bank received over $3 million in Bank Enterprise Awards from the CDFI Fund over the
last ten years. We reinvest the proceeds from CDFI-related grants and awards back into the communities we serve. While we believe we will be able to meet the certification criteria required to continue our CDFI status, there is no certainty
that we will be able to do so. If we do not meet one or more of the criteria, the CDFI Fund, in its sole discretion, may provide an opportunity for us to cure deficiencies prior to issuing a notice of termination of certification. A loss of
CDFI status, and the resulting inability to obtain certain grants and awards received in the past, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or business.
Systems failures, interruptions and cybersecurity breaches in our information technology and telecommunications systems and of third-party service providers could have a
material adverse effect on us.
Our business is dependent on the successful and uninterrupted functioning of our information technology and telecommunications systems and the systems of its third-party service providers. The
failure of these systems, or the termination of a third-party software license or service agreement on which any of these systems is based, could interrupt our operations. Because our information technology and telecommunications systems
interface with and depend on third-party systems, we could experience service denials if demand for such services exceeds capacity, or such third-party systems fail or experience interruptions. If significant, sustained, or repeated, a system
failure or service denial could compromise our ability to operate effectively, damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, and/or subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny and possible financial liability, any of which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our information technology systems and of our third-party service providers may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses, phishing schemes and other security breaches. We likely
will expend additional resources to protect against the threat of such cybersecurity incident, or to alleviate problems caused by such cybersecurity incident. However, there can be no certainty that these measures will be sufficient in
safeguarding against any such threats. Security breaches and viruses potentially exposing sensitive data, including our proprietary business information and that of our customers, suppliers and business partners, as well as personally
identifiable information about our customers and employees, could expose us to claims, regulatory scrutiny, litigation costs and other possible liabilities and reputational harm. Further, there can be no assurance that our insurance coverage
will be sufficient to cover any losses that may result from a cybersecurity incident or breach of our systems.
The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological change, and we may not have the resources to effectively implement new technology or may experience
operational challenges when implementing new technology.
The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The effective use of technology increases
efficiency and enables financial institutions to reduce costs while increasing customer service and convenience. Our future success will depend, at least in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to
provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience, as well as create additional efficiencies in our operations as we continue to grow and expand our products and service offerings. We may experience operational
challenges as we implement these new technology enhancements or products, which could result in us not fully realizing the anticipated benefits from such new technology or incurring significant costs to remedy any such challenges in a timely
manner.
Many of our larger competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. As a result, they may be able to offer additional or superior products compared to
those that we are able to provide, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage. Accordingly, we may lose customers seeking new technology-driven products and services to the extent we are unable to provide such products and services.
The markets in which we operate are susceptible to natural disasters, including earthquakes, fires, drought, flooding, extreme heat, and other severe weather or catastrophic
events, any of which could result in a disruption of our operations and increases in loan losses.
A significant portion of our business is generated from markets that have been, and will continue to be, susceptible to damage by earthquakes, fires, drought, major seasonal flooding, and other
severe weather or catastrophic events. In addition, natural disasters and other adverse external events can disrupt our operations, cause widespread property damage, and severely depress the local economies in which we operate. The value of
real estate or other collateral that secures our loans could be materially and adversely affected by a disaster, resulting in decreased revenue and loan losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or
results of operations. If the economies in our primary markets experience an overall decline as a result of a natural disaster, severe weather, or other catastrophic event, demand for loans and our other products and services could be
reduced. In addition, the rates of delinquencies, foreclosures, bankruptcies, and loan losses may increase substantially, as uninsured property losses or sustained job interruption or loss may materially impair the ability of borrowers to
repay their loans.
Risks Relating to the Company Being a Public Benefit Corporation
We cannot provide any assurance that we will achieve our public benefit purposes.
As a public benefit corporation, we are required to seek to produce a public benefit or benefits and to operate in a responsible and sustainable manner, balancing our stockholders’ pecuniary
interests, the best interests of those materially affected by our conduct, and the public benefit or benefits identified by our certificate of incorporation. There is no assurance that we will achieve our public benefit purposes or that the
expected positive impact from being a public benefit corporation will be realized, which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, which in turn may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of
operations, assets, or business. As a public benefit corporation, we are required to report publicly at least biennially on the overall public benefit performance and on the assessment of our success in achieving our specific public benefit
purpose. If we are not timely in providing this report or are unable to provide this report, or if the report is not viewed favorably by parties doing business with us or who are regulators or others reviewing its credentials, our reputation
and status as a public benefit corporation may be harmed.
As a Delaware public benefit corporation, our focus on specific public benefit purposes and producing a positive effect for society can negatively impact our financial
performance.
Unlike traditional corporations, which have a fiduciary duty to focus primarily on maximizing stockholder value, directors of the Company (as a public benefit corporation) have a fiduciary duty
to consider not only our stockholders’ interests, but also the Company’s specific public benefit purposes and the interests of other stakeholder constituencies and to balance those interests in making business decisions. As a result, actions
we take that we believe to be in the best interests of those stakeholders and to help achieve our specific benefit purposes do not always fully align with our stockholder’s pecuniary interests. While we intend our status as a public benefit
corporation to provide an overall net benefit to the Company, our customers, employees, community, and stockholders, this could result in actions or decisions that may not maximize the income generated from our business. In addition, our
pursuit of longer-term or non-pecuniary benefits may not materialize within the timeframe we expect or at all. Accordingly, our corporate form as a public benefit corporation and compliance with the related obligations can have an adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations, assets or business.
Furthermore, as a public benefit corporation, we may be less attractive as a takeover target than a traditional company would be and, therefore, our stockholders’ ability to realize their
investment through an acquisition may be reduced. Public benefit corporations may also not be attractive targets for activists or hedge fund investors because directors are required to balance our stockholders’ pecuniary interests, the best
interests of those materially affected by our Company’s conduct, and the public benefit or benefits identified by the Company’s certificate of incorporation, and stockholders committed to the public benefit can bring a suit to enforce this
balancing requirement. Further, because the board of directors of a public benefit corporation considers additional constituencies rather than just maximizing stockholder value, Delaware public benefit corporation law could make it easier for
a board to reject a hostile bid, even if the takeover would provide the greatest short-term financial gain to stockholders.
As a Delaware public benefit corporation, the Company’s directors have a fiduciary duty to consider not only our stockholders’ interests, but also the specific public benefit
purposes we have committed to promote and the interests of other stakeholder constituencies. If a conflict between such interests arises, there is no guarantee such conflict would be resolved in favor of the interests of our stockholders.
While directors of traditional corporations are required to make decisions they believe to be in the best interests of their stockholders, directors of a public benefit corporation have a
fiduciary duty to consider not only the stockholders’ interests, but also the company’s specific public benefit purposes and the interests of other stakeholder constituencies. Under Delaware law, directors are shielded from liability for
breach of their fiduciary duties if they make informed and disinterested decisions that serve a rational purpose. Unlike traditional corporations which must focus exclusively on stockholder value, as a public benefit corporation, our
directors are not merely permitted, but obligated, to consider, in addition to the interests of stockholders, the Company’s specific public benefit purposes and the interests of other stakeholder constituencies in making business decisions.
In the event of a conflict between the interests of our stockholders and the specific public benefit purposes, we have a commitment to consider the interests of other stakeholder constituencies, and therefore, our directors are obligated to
balance those interests, and are deemed to have satisfied their fiduciary duties as long as their decisions are informed and disinterested and are not decisions that no person of ordinary, sound judgment would approve. As a result, there is
no certainty that a conflict would be resolved in favor of our stockholders, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, assets or business.
As a Delaware public benefit corporation, we may be subject to increased derivative litigation concerning our duty to balance stockholder and public benefit interests, the
occurrence of which may have an adverse impact on its financial condition and results of operations.
Stockholders of a Delaware public benefit corporation (if they, individually or collectively, own at least two percent of the company’s outstanding shares or, in the case of a corporation with
shares listed on a national securities exchange, the lesser of such percentage or shares with a market value of at least $2 million as of the date the action is filed) are entitled to file a lawsuit (individual, derivative, or any other type
of action) claiming the directors failed to balance stockholder and public benefit interests. This potential claim does not exist for traditional corporations. Therefore, we are subject to the possibility of increased derivative litigation,
which would require the attention of our management, and, as a result, may adversely impact management’s ability to effectively execute our strategy. Additionally, such derivative litigation may be costly, which may have an adverse impact on
our financial condition, results of operations, assets, or business.
ITEM 1B. |
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|
Not applicable.
In the ordinary course
of business, we rely on electronic communications and information systems to conduct our operations and to store sensitive data. We employ an in‑depth, layered, defensive approach that leverages people, processes, and technology to manage and
maintain cybersecurity controls. We employ a variety of preventative and detective tools to monitor, block, and provide alerts regarding suspicious activity, as well as to report on any suspected persistent threats. Notwithstanding the strength of
our defensive measures, the threat from cybersecurity attacks is severe, attacks are sophisticated and increasing in volume, and attackers respond rapidly to changes in defensive measures. While to date we have not experienced a significant
compromise, significant data loss or any material financial losses related to cybersecurity attacks, our systems and those of our customers and third‑party service providers are under constant threat, creating the possibility of future events. Risks and exposures related to cybersecurity attacks are expected to remain high for the foreseeable future due to the rapidly evolving nature and sophistication of these
threats, as well as due to the expanding use of internet banking, mobile banking and other technology‑based products and services by us and our customers.
The security and
maintenance of our information technology systems is important to our operations and business strategy. To this end, we have implemented processes designed to assess, identify, and manage risks from potential unauthorized occurrences on or through our information technology systems that may result in adverse effects on the confidentiality,
integrity, and availability of these systems and the data residing therein. These processes are informed in part by industry standards, principles and frameworks, such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework,
and are managed and monitored by a dedicated information technology team, which is led by our Director of Information Technology, and includes mechanisms, controls, technologies, systems, and other processes designed to prevent or mitigate data
loss, theft, misuse, or other security incidents or vulnerabilities affecting the data and to maintain a stable information technology environment. For example, we conduct penetration and vulnerability tests, data recovery tests, security audits, and ongoing risk assessments, including due diligence on our key technology vendors, contractors, and suppliers. We conduct regular employee training on cybersecurity and information security, among other topics. In addition, we consult with outside advisors and experts, when appropriate, on a regular basis to assist with assessing, identifying, and managing cybersecurity risks, including anticipated future threats and trends, and their estimated impact
on the Company’s risk environment.
Our Director of Information Technology, who reports to the Chief Financial Officer, has over 15 years of experience managing information technology and cybersecurity matters and is experienced in cloud, infrastructure management, business operations, and cybersecurity, and, together
with our Information Technology Steering Committee, is responsible for assessing and managing cybersecurity risks. We consider cybersecurity, along with other significant risks that we face, within
our overall enterprise risk management framework. We have not identified risks from known cybersecurity threats, including those resulting from prior cybersecurity incidents, that have materially affected us, and we face ongoing cybersecurity risks threats that, if realized, are reasonably likely to materially affect us. Additional information on cybersecurity risks we face
is discussed in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors.” under the heading “Systems failures, interruptions and cybersecurity breaches in our information technology and telecommunications systems and of third-party service providers could have a material
adverse effect on us.”
The Board, as a whole and at the committee level, has oversight
for the most significant risks facing us and for our processes to identify, prioritize, assess, manage, and mitigate cybersecurity risks. The Risk and Compliance Committee is a
board-level committee designated by our Board to oversee cybersecurity risks. The Risk and Compliance Committee receives updates on cybersecurity matters at least quarterly, and our processes require ad hoc updates within two days of a breach as part of
the Bank’s cybersecurity risk management strategy designed to protect the information and assets that are critical to our business. The full Board receives an Annual Report from the Director of Information Technology on the Bank’s Information
Technology Systems, including cybersecurity risk.
We conduct our business through two administrative offices, one in Washington, D.C. and one in Los Angeles, California. We have three branch offices, one in Washington, D.C., one in Los Angeles,
California, and one in Inglewood, California. Our loan service operation is also conducted from our Inglewood, California branch. There are no mortgages, material liens or encumbrances against any of our owned properties. We believe that all
the properties are adequately covered by insurance, and that our facilities are adequate to meet our present needs.
Location
|
Leased
or Owned
|
Original Date
Leased or Acquired
|
Date of Lease
Expiration
|
East Coast Administrative Offices & Branch
|
Owned
|
2003
|
–
|
1432 U Street NW
|
|
|
|
Washington, D.C. 20009
|
|
|
|
Employee Parking Lot
|
Owned
|
2018
|
–
|
14 T Street NW
|
|
|
|
Washington, D.C. 20009
|
|
|
|
West Coast Administrative Offices/Loan Origination Center
|
Leased
|
2021
|
Oct. 2026
|
4601 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 150
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles, CA 90010
|
|
|
|
Branch Office/Loan Service Center
|
Owned
|
1996
|
–
|
170 N. Market Street
|
|
|
|
Inglewood, CA 90301
|
|
|
|
Exposition Park Branch Office
|
Owned
|
1996
|
–
|
4001 South Figueroa Street
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles, CA 90037
|
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
In the ordinary course of business, we are defendants in various litigation matters from time to time. In our opinion, the disposition of any litigation and other legal and regulatory matters
currently pending or threatened against us would not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ITEM 4. |
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
|
Not Applicable
PART II
ITEM 5. |
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “BYFC.”
The closing sale price for our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on March 21, 2025 was $7.59 per share. As of February 28, 2025, we had 331 registered stockholders. As of February 28,
2025, we had 6,022,227 shares of Class A voting common stock outstanding, 1,425,574 shares of Class B non‑voting common stock outstanding and 1,672,562 shares of Class C non-voting stock outstanding. Our non‑voting common stock (Class B and
Class C) is not listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market, but our Class C stock is convertible into our voting common stock in connection with certain sale or other transfer transactions.
In general, we may pay dividends out of funds legally available for that purpose at such times as our Board determines that dividend payments are appropriate, after considering our net income,
capital requirements, financial condition, alternate investment options, prevailing economic conditions, industry practices and other factors deemed to be relevant at the time. We suspended our prior policy of paying regular cash dividends in
May 2010 in order to retain capital for reinvestment in the Company’s business.
On October 31, 2023, the Company effected a reverse stock split of the Company’s outstanding shares of Class A common stock, Class B common stock, and Class C common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, at a ratio of 1-for-8 (the “Reverse Stock Split”). The shares of Class A Common Stock listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market commenced trading on The Nasdaq Capital Market on a post-Reverse Stock Split adjusted basis at the open of
business on November 1, 2023. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, the number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split was reduced such that every 8 shares of common stock held by a
stockholder immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split were combined and reclassified into one share of common stock. All common stock share amounts and per share numbers discussed herein have been retroactively adjusted, as applicable,
for the Reverse Stock Split.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
None.
Repurchases of Equity Securities
None.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information about the Company’s common stock that may be issued under equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2024.
Plan category
|
|
Number of
securities to be
issued upon exercise
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
(a)
|
|
|
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
|
|
|
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Long Term Incentive Plan
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
2018 Long Term Incentive Plan
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
12.96
|
|
|
|
342,093
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
$
|
12.96
|
|
|
|
342,093
|
|
In May 2024 and February 2023, the Company awarded 19,832 and 9,230 shares of common stock, respectively, to its directors under the LTIP, which are fully vested. The Company recorded $96
thousand and $95 thousand of compensation expense in the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively, based on the fair value of the stock on the date of the award.
On March 26, 2024 and April 5, 2024, the Company issued 126,083 shares of restricted stock to its officers and employees under the Amended and Restated 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”), of
which 13,015 shares have been forfeited as of December 31, 2024. Each restricted stock award was valued based on the fair value of the stock on the date of the award. These awarded shares of restricted stock fully vest over periods ranging
from 36 months to 60 months from their respective dates of grant. Stock-based compensation is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recorded $108 thousand of
stock-based compensation expense related to these restricted stock awards.
On June 21, 2023, the Company issued 92,720 shares of restricted stock to its officers and employees under the LTIP, of which 23,997 shares have been forfeited as of December 31, 2024. Each
restricted stock award was valued based on the fair value of the stock on the date of the award. These awarded shares of restricted stock fully vest over periods ranging from 36 months to 60 months from their respective dates of grant.
Stock-based compensation is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recorded $113 thousand and $104 thousand, respectively, of stock-based compensation
expense related to these restricted stock awards.
In March 2022, the Company issued 61,908 shares of restricted stock to its officers and employees under the LTIP, of which 21,276 shares have been forfeited as of December 31, 2024. Each
restricted stock award was valued based on the fair value of the stock on the date of the award. These awarded shares of restricted stock fully vest over periods ranging from 36 months to 60 months from their respective dates of grant.
Stock-based compensation is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. During 2024 and 2023, the Company recorded $88 thousand and $106 thousand of stock-based compensation expense related to shares awarded to employees.
ITEM 7. |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
The following discussion is intended to provide a reader of our financial statements with a narrative from the perspective of our management on our financial condition, results of operations,
liquidity and other factors that have affected our reported results of operations and financial condition or may affect our future results or financial condition. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated
Financial Statements and related Notes included in Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Total assets decreased by $71.7 million to $1.3 billion at December 31, 2024, compared to $1.4 billion at December 31, 2023, reflecting decreases in securities available-for-sale of $113.1
million, primarily due to maturities and paydowns, and cash and cash equivalents of $43.8 million, primarily due to repayments of borrowings. These decreases were partially offset by growth in net loans of $88.4 million during the year ended
December 31, 2024.
Total liabilities decreased by $75.0 million to $1.0 billion at December 31, 2024 from $1.1 billion at December 31, 2023. The decrease in total liabilities during 2024 resulted primarily from
decreases in borrowings of $100.0 million from the Bank Fund Term Program, as well as decreases of $14.0 million in notes payable, $13.8 million in FHLB advances and $6.9 million in securities sold under agreements to repurchase, offset by a
net $62.8 million increase in total deposits.
We recorded net income attributable to Broadway of $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 or $0.04 per share compared to net income of $4.5 million or $0.52 per share
for the year ended December 31, 2023. Net income attributable to common stockholders was $359 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2024 after deducting preferred dividends of $1.6 million, compared to net income attributable to common
stockholders of $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. Diluted earnings per common share was $0.04 for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to $0.51 of earnings per diluted common share for the year ended December 31,
2023. Diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2024 reflects preferred dividends of $0.18 per diluted common share.
The decrease in net income attributable to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily resulted from a decrease in
non-interest income of $3.8 million, related to grant income received from the Equitable Recovery Program administered by the U.S. Treasury’s Community Development Financial Institutions (“CDFI”) Fund in
2023, and an increase in non-interest expense of $2.5 million, partially offset by an increase in net interest income after provision for credit losses of $2.6 million, and a decrease in tax expense of $1.2 million.
The following table summarizes the return on average assets, the return on average equity and the average equity to average assets ratios for the periods indicated:
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
2022
|
|
Return on average assets
|
|
|
0.14
|
%
|
|
|
0.37
|
%
|
|
|
0.52
|
%
|
Return on average equity
|
|
|
0.69
|
%
|
|
|
1.62
|
%
|
|
|
2.19
|
%
|
Average equity to average assets
|
|
|
20.58
|
%
|
|
|
22.60
|
%
|
|
|
23.60
|
%
|
Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023
General
Our most significant source of income is net interest income, which is the difference between our interest income and our interest expense. Generally, interest income is generated from our loans
and investments (interest earning assets) and interest expense is incurred from deposits and borrowings (interest-bearing liabilities). Typically, our results of operations are also affected by our provision for credit losses, non-interest
income generated from service charges and fees on loan and deposit accounts, non-interest expenses, and income taxes.
Net Interest Income
For the year ended December 31, 2024, net interest income before provision for credit losses increased by $2.3 million, or 7.8%, to $31.8 million, compared to $29.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2023. The increase resulted from higher interest income of $15.0 million, partially offset by an increase in interest expense of $12.7 million.
Interest income and fees on loans receivable increased by $11.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to
a $138.8 million increase in the average balance of loans receivable which increased interest income by $6.9 million. In addition, the average loan yield increased from 4.59% for the year ended December 31, 2023, to 5.15% for the year ended
December 31, 2024, which increased interest income by $4.8 million.
Interest income on securities decreased by $1.7 million to $7.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $8.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in
interest income on securities primarily resulted from a decrease of $59.5 million in the average balance of securities, which decreased interest income by $1.6 million. In addition, we had a decrease of 2 basis points in the average interest
yield earned on investment securities during 2024, which decreased interest income by $71 thousand.
Other interest income increased by $5.0 million in 2024, compared to the same period in 2023, primarily due to an increase of $87.9 million in the average balance of
interest-earnings deposits, which increased interest income by $4.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.
Interest expense on deposits increased by $5.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to an increase of 94 basis points in
the average cost of deposits. The average cost of deposits increased to 2.24% for 2024, compared to 1.30% for 2023, which increased interest expense by $5.0 million.
Interest expense on borrowings increased by $7.0 million to $17.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $10.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase
was primarily due to an increase in the average balance of outstanding Bank Fund Term Program borrowings of $91.5 million, which increased interest expense by $4.7 million, and a $22.6 million increase in the average balance of FHLB advances,
which increased interest expense by $1.1 million. Further, a 102 basis point increase in the average rate paid on securities sold under agreements to repurchase increased interest expense by $803 thousand.
The net interest margin decreased to 2.40% for the year ended December 31, 2024 from 2.55% for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to the average cost of funds increasing to 3.16%
for the year ended December 31, 2024 from 2.15% for the year ended December 31, 2023 due to rate increases by the Federal Reserve. This increase was partially offset by an improvement of 61 basis points in the average yield earned on
average interest-earning assets.
Analysis of Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the difference between income on interest earning assets and the expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income depends upon the relative amounts of interest
earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rates earned or paid on them. The following table sets forth average balances, average yields and costs, and certain other information for the years indicated. All average
balances are daily average balances. The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred loan fees, deferred origination costs, and discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or expense. We do not accrue
interest on loans that are on non-accrual status; however, the balance of these loans is included in the total average balance, which has the effect of reducing average loan yields.
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
2022
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
Yield/
Cost
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
Yield/
Cost
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
Yield/
Cost
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning deposits
|
|
$
|
101,873
|
|
|
$
|
5,423
|
|
|
|
5.32
|
%
|
|
$
|
14,013
|
|
|
$
|
573
|
|
|
|
4.09
|
%
|
|
$
|
147,482
|
|
|
$
|
1,677
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
%
|
Securities
|
|
|
263,227
|
|
|
|
7,034
|
|
|
|
2.67
|
%
|
|
|
322,764
|
|
|
|
8,697
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
%
|
|
|
252,285
|
|
|
|
5,596
|
|
|
|
2.22
|
%
|
Loans receivable, net (1)
|
|
|
947,603
|
|
|
|
48,807
|
|
|
|
5.15
|
%
|
|
|
808,850
|
|
|
|
37,143
|
|
|
|
4.59
|
%
|
|
|
674,837
|
|
|
|
28,732
|
(2)
|
|
|
4.26
|
%
|
FRB and FHLB stock
|
|
|
13,363
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
7.07
|
%
|
|
|
11,859
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
6.87
|
%
|
|
|
3,732
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
7.07
|
%
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
1,326,066
|
|
|
$
|
62,209
|
|
|
|
4.69
|
%
|
|
|
1,157,486
|
|
|
$
|
47,228
|
|
|
|
4.08
|
%
|
|
|
1,078,336
|
|
|
$
|
36,269
|
|
|
|
3.36
|
%
|
Non-interest-earning assets
|
|
|
51,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,377,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,231,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,143,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market deposits
|
|
$
|
284,263
|
|
|
$
|
6,929
|
|
|
|
2.44
|
%
|
|
$
|
262,827
|
|
|
$
|
4,269
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
%
|
|
$
|
192,835
|
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
0.67
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
55,715
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
0.67
|
%
|
|
|
59,928
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
|
|
66,033
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
Interest checking and other demand deposits
|
|
|
74,302
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
%
|
|
|
100,248
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
%
|
|
|
240,380
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
Certificate accounts
|
|
|
175,275
|
|
|
|
5,331
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
%
|
|
|
154,275
|
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
|
1.77
|
%
|
|
|
182,050
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
589,555
|
|
|
|
13,183
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
|
|
577,278
|
|
|
|
7,512
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
%
|
|
|
681,298
|
|
|
|
2,104
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
%
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
199,893
|
|
|
|
9,567
|
|
|
|
4.79
|
%
|
|
|
177,261
|
|
|
|
8,331
|
|
|
|
4.70
|
%
|
|
|
61,593
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
1.74
|
%
|
BTFP borrowing
|
|
|
92,308
|
|
|
|
4,787
|
|
|
|
5.19
|
%
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
4.87
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
80,181
|
|
|
|
2,903
|
|
|
|
3.62
|
%
|
|
|
72,465
|
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
2.60
|
%
|
|
|
61,106
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
%
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
372,382
|
|
|
|
17,257
|
|
|
|
4.63
|
%
|
|
|
250,548
|
|
|
|
10,254
|
|
|
|
4.09
|
%
|
|
|
122,699
|
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
961,937
|
|
|
$
|
30,440
|
|
|
|
3.16
|
%
|
|
|
827,826
|
|
|
$
|
17,766
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
%
|
|
|
803,997
|
|
|
$
|
3,409
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
%
|
Non-interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
131,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
283,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
1,377,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,231,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,143,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,769
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,462
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,860
|
|
|
|
2.94
|
%
|
Net interest rate margin (4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.05
|
%
|
Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137.85
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139.82
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134.12
|
%
|
(1) |
Amount is net of deferred loan fees, loan discounts and loans in process, and includes deferred origination costs, loan premiums and loans receivable held for sale.
|
(2) |
Includes non‑accrual interest of $102 thousand, reflecting interest recoveries on non‑accrual loans that were paid off for the year ended December 31, 2022.
|
(3) |
Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average interest‑earning assets and the cost of average interest‑bearing liabilities.
|
(4) |
Net interest rate margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest‑earning assets.
|
Changes in our net interest income are a function of changes in both rates and volumes of interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following table sets forth information
regarding changes in our interest income and expense for the years indicated. Information is provided in each category with respect to (i) changes attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate), (ii) changes
attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume), and (iii) the total change. The changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and
the changes due to rate.
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2024
Compared to
Year Ended December 31, 2023
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2023
Compared to
Year Ended December 31, 2022
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net
Interest Income
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
Due to
Volume
|
|
|
Due to
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Due to
Volume
|
|
|
Due to
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Interest‑earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest‑earning deposits
|
|
$
|
4,627
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
4,850
|
|
|
$
|
(2,536
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,432
|
|
|
$
|
(1,104
|
)
|
Securities
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(1,663
|
)
|
|
|
1,753
|
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
3,101
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
|
6,825
|
|
|
|
4,839
|
|
|
|
11,664
|
|
|
|
6,027
|
|
|
|
2,384
|
|
|
|
8,411
|
|
FRB and FHLB stock
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
551
|
|
Total interest‑earning assets
|
|
|
9,966
|
|
|
|
5,015
|
|
|
|
14,981
|
|
|
|
5,803
|
|
|
|
5,156
|
|
|
|
10,959
|
|
Interest‑bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market deposits
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
2,290
|
|
|
|
2,660
|
|
|
|
(580
|
)
|
|
|
3,561
|
|
|
|
2,981
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Interest checking and other demand deposits
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
Certificate accounts
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
2,180
|
|
|
|
2,595
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
2,292
|
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
5,010
|
|
|
|
5,671
|
|
|
|
(684
|
)
|
|
|
6,092
|
|
|
|
5,408
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
1,236
|
|
|
|
3,807
|
|
|
|
3,453
|
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
BTFP borrowing
|
|
|
4,744
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4,747
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
6,042
|
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
7,003
|
|
|
|
3,898
|
|
|
|
5,051
|
|
|
|
8,949
|
|
Total interest‑bearing liabilities
|
|
|
6,703
|
|
|
|
5,971
|
|
|
|
12,674
|
|
|
|
3,214
|
|
|
|
11,143
|
|
|
|
14,357
|
|
Change in net interest income
|
|
$
|
3,263
|
|
|
$
|
(956
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,307
|
|
|
$
|
2,589
|
|
|
$
|
(5,987
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,398
|
)
|
Provision for Credit Losses
During the year ended December 31, 2024, we recorded a provision for credit losses of $664 thousand, compared to a provision for credit losses of $933 thousand during the same period in 2023.
No loan charge-offs were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2024 or 2023. The Bank recorded a recovery of $216 thousand during the fourth quarter of 2023. We also recorded a recovery of provision for off-balance sheet loan
commitments of $91 thousand and $2 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. See “Allowance for Credit Losses” for additional information.
Non‑Interest Income
For the year ended December 31, 2024, non-interest income totaled $1.6 million, compared to $5.4 million for the year-ended December 31, 2023. The decrease of $3.8 million in
non-interest income was primarily the result of non-recurring income of $3.7 million from a grant from the CDFI Fund’s Equitable Recovery Program recognized during 2023.
Non‑Interest Expense
Non-interest expenses totaled $29.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $27.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to increases
in compensation and benefits expenses of $1.9 million and professional fees of $323 thousand.
The increase of $1.9 million in compensation and benefits expense during 2024 compared to 2023 reflects the investment in additional executives and staff to support growth and strengthen overall
controls and management depth. The increase in professional services expense was primarily due to the costs associated with third-party professionals that were retained in connection with the Company’s remediation efforts of the weaknesses
in internal controls that were identified during preparation of the financial statements for the third quarter of 2023.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense or benefit is computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 21%. State taxes are recorded at the State of California tax rate and Washington, D.C. tax rate,
according to the state apportionment calculation as the Bank’s operations are conducted in both California and the Washington, D.C. area. The Company recorded an income tax expense of $814 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2024,
representing an effective tax rate of 29.4%, compared to an income tax expense of $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, representing an effective tax rate of 30.4%. The effective tax rate for each year differs from the 21%
federal statutory rate due to the impact of state taxes as well as various permanent tax differences, vesting of stock-based compensation and other discrete items.
Our deferred tax asset totaled $8.8 million at December 31, 2024 and $9.5 million at December 31, 2023. See Note 1 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 14 “Income Taxes” of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a further discussion of income taxes and a reconciliation of income tax at the federal statutory tax rate to the actual income tax benefit.
Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2024 and 2023
Securities Available-For-Sale
As of December 31, 2024, we had $203.9 million of investment securities classified as available-for-sale, compared to $317.0 million at December 31, 2023. The decrease during 2024 was primarily
due to principal payments and maturities.
Loans Receivable Held for Investment
Loans receivable held for investment, net of the allowance for credit losses, totaled $968.9 million at December 31, 2024, compared to $880.5 million at December 31, 2023. The increase of $88.4
million in loans receivable held for investment during 2024 was primarily due to originations of $157.7 million in new loans, $80.9 million of which were multi-family loans, $50.8 million in commercial real estate loans, $17.6 million in
other commercial loans, $7.6 million in construction loans, and $800 thousand in SBA loans. Loan repayments during 2024 totaled $69.1 million.
During 2023, the Bank originated $162.1 million in new loans, $78.9 million of which were multi-family loans, $40.0 million of which were construction loans, $28.3 million of which were
commercial real estate loans, and $15.0 million of which were other commercial loans. Loan repayments during 2023 totaled $47.2 million.
Allowance for Credit Losses
Effective January 1, 2023, the Company accounts for credit losses on loans in accordance with ASC 326, which requires the Company to record an estimate of expected lifetime credit losses for
loans at the time of origination or acquisition. The ACL is maintained at a level deemed appropriate by management to provide for expected credit losses in the portfolio as of the date of the consolidated statements of financial condition.
Estimating expected credit losses requires management to use relevant forward-looking information, including the use of reasonable and supportable forecasts. The measurement of the ACL is performed by collectively evaluating loans with
similar risk characteristics. The Company measures the ACL for each of its loan segments using the WARM method. The weighted average remaining life, including the effect of estimated prepayments, is calculated for each loan pool on a
quarterly basis. The Company then estimates a loss rate for each pool using both its own historical loss experience and the historical losses of a group of peer institutions during the period from 2004 through the most recent quarter.
Our ACL was $8.1 million or 0.83% of our gross loans receivable held for investment at December 31, 2024 compared to $7.3 million, or 0.83% of our gross loans receivable held for investment at
December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily due to growth in the loan portfolio.
Our non-performing loans consist of delinquent loans that are 90 days or more past due and other loans, including loans modified in response to a borrower’s financial difficulty, that do not
qualify for accrual status. At December 31, 2024, NPLs totaled $264 thousand compared to $0 at December 31, 2023. The Bank did not have any REO at December 31, 2024 or 2023. There were no loans that were modified in response to a borrower’s
financial difficulty during 2024 or 2023.
We believe the ACL is adequate to cover expected losses in the loan portfolio as of December 31, 2024, but because of uncertainty regarding the future value of the loan portfolio, there can be
no assurance that actual losses will not exceed the estimated amounts. In addition, the OCC and the FDIC periodically review the ACL as an integral part of their examination process. These agencies may require an increase in the ACL based on
their judgments of the information available to them at the time of their examinations.
See Note 1 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Office Properties and Equipment, Net
Net office properties and equipment decreased by $286 thousand to $8.9 million at December 31, 2024 from $9.2 million as of December 31, 2023. Depreciation expense was $424 thousand and $385
thousand for the years 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible
As a result of the Merger, the Company recorded $25.9 million of goodwill. Goodwill acquired in a purchase business combination that is determined to have an indefinite useful life is not
amortized, but is tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events and circumstances exist that indicate the necessity for such impairment tests to be performed.
No impairment charges were recorded during 2024 for goodwill impairment. Management’s assessment of goodwill is performed in accordance with ASC 350-20 – Intangibles-Goodwill
and Other, which allows the Company to perform a qualitative assessment of goodwill to determine if it is more likely than not the fair value of the Company’s equity is below its carrying value. The Company performed its qualitative
and quantitative assessment as of September 30, 2024.
The Company recorded $3.3 million of core deposit intangible asset as a result of the Merger. The core deposit intangible asset is amortized on an accelerated basis reflecting the pattern in
which the economic benefits of the intangible asset are consumed or otherwise used up. The estimated life of the core deposit intangible is approximately 10 years. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recorded $336 thousand of
amortization expense related to the core deposit intangible asset.
The following table outlines the estimated amortization expense related to the core deposit intangible asset during the next five fiscal years and thereafter:
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
2026
|
|
|
304
|
|
2027
|
|
|
291
|
|
2028
|
|
|
279
|
|
2029
|
|
|
267
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,775
|
|
Deposits
Deposits at December 31, 2024 were $745.4 million compared to $682.6 million at December 31, 2023. The increase in deposits of $62.8 million was primarily caused by an increase in Insured Cash
Sweep (“ICS”) deposits.
Five customer relationships accounted for approximately 18% of our deposit balances at December 31, 2024. We expect to maintain these relationships with these customers for the foreseeable
future.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, approximately $268.8 million and $286.4 million of our total deposits were not insured by FDIC insurance.
Borrowings
Total borrowings at December 31, 2024 consisted of advances to the Bank from the FHLB of $195.5 million and repurchase agreements of $66.6 million, compared to advances from the FHLB of $209.3
million, repurchase agreements of $73.5 million and borrowings associated with the BTFP of $100.0 million at December 31, 2023.
Balances of outstanding FHLB advances decreased to $195.5 million at December 31, 2024, from $209.3 million at December 31, 2023, primarily due to repayments of FHLB advances of
$352.8 million, partially offset by $339.0 million in advances from the FHLB. The weighted average rate on FHLB advances was 4.03% at December 31, 2024, compared to 4.91% at December 31, 2023.
Borrowings under the BTFP with the Federal Reserve were $100.0 million as of December 31, 2023. This borrowing was paid off in December 2024. The interest rate was fixed at 4.84% and the borrowing matured on
December 29, 2024. Investment securities with a book value of $107.3 million and a fair value of $98.3 million were pledged as collateral for this borrowing as of December 31, 2023.
The Bank enters into agreements under which it sells securities subject to an obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities. Under these arrangements, the Bank may
transfer legal control over the assets but still retain effective control through an agreement that both entitles and obligates the Bank to repurchase the assets. As a result, these repurchase agreements are accounted for as collateralized
financing agreements (i.e., secured borrowings) and not as a sale and subsequent repurchase of securities. The obligation to repurchase the securities is reflected as a liability in the Bank’s consolidated statements of financial condition,
while the securities underlying the repurchase agreements remain in the respective investment securities asset accounts. In other words, there is no offsetting or netting of the investment securities assets with the repurchase agreement
liabilities. As of December 31, 2024, securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaled $66.6 million at an average rate of 3.62%. These agreements mature on a daily basis. The fair value of securities pledged totaled $83.3 million as
of December 31, 2024 and included $46.5 million of U.S. Treasuries, $27.1 million of federal agency debt, $5.5 million of federal agency mortgage-backed securities, and $4.2 million of SBA pools. As of December 31, 2023, securities sold
under agreements to repurchase totaled $73.5 million at an average rate of 2.60%. The fair value of securities pledged totaled $89.0 million as of December 31, 2023 and included $47.8 million of U.S.
Treasuries, $30.2 million of federal agency debt, and $11.0 million of federal agency mortgage-backed securities.
One customer relationship accounted for 88% of our balance of securities sold under agreements to repurchase. We expect to maintain this relationship for the foreseeable future.
In connection with the New Market Tax Credit activities of City First Bank, CFC 45 is a partnership whose members include CFNMA and City First New Markets Fund II, LLC. This CDE acts in effect
as a pass-through for a Merrill Lynch allocation totaling $14.0 million that needed to be deployed. In December 2015, Merrill Lynch made a $14.0 million non-recourse loan to CFC 45, whereby CFC 45 passed that loan through to a QALICB. The
loan to the QALICB was secured by a Leasehold Deed of Trust that, due to the pass-through, non-recourse structure, was operationally and ultimately for the benefit of Merrill Lynch rather than CFC 45. Debt service payments received by CFC 45
from the QALICB were passed through to Merrill Lynch in return for which CFC 45 received a servicing fee. This note was paid off during January 2024. The financial statements of CFC 45 are consolidated with those of the Bank and the Company.
Stockholders’ Equity
Stockholders’ equity was $285.2 million, or 21.9% of the Company’s total assets, at December 31, 2024, compared to $281.9 million, or 20.5% of the Company’s total assets, at December 31, 2023.
On October 31, 2023 the Company purchased 244,771 shares of its Class A (voting) Common Stock (adjusted for the 1-for-8 reverse stock split effective November 1, 2023) from the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (“FDIC”), which obtained the shares when it was appointed receiver for First Republic Bank upon its closure earlier in 2023. The purchased shares represented just under 4.0% of the Company’s total voting shares prior to the
purchase, and over 2.6% of the Company’s total common equity. The Company purchased the shares at a price of $7.2760 per share (adjusted for the 1-for-8 reverse stock split effective November 1, 2023), which represented the 20-day volume
weighted average price for the Class A shares over the period ended October 24, 2023.
The Company’s book value per common share was $14.82 at December 31, 2024, and its tangible book value per common share was $11.79 at December 31, 2024. Tangible book value per common share is a
non-GAAP measurement that excludes goodwill and the net unamortized core deposit intangible asset, which were both originally recorded in connection with the Merger. The Company uses this non-GAAP financial measure to provide meaningful
supplemental information regarding the Company’s financial condition and operational performance, and to enhance comparability with banks that have not recorded goodwill and core deposit intangibles in a merger transaction. A reconciliation
between common book value (calculated in accordance with GAAP) and tangible book value per common share December 31, 2024 is shown as follows:
|
|
Common
Equity Capital
|
|
|
Shares
Outstanding
|
|
|
Per Share
Amount
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Common book value
|
|
$
|
135,157
|
|
|
|
9,120,363
|
|
|
$
|
14.82
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
25,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unamortized core deposit intangible
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible book value
|
|
$
|
107,524
|
|
|
|
9,120,363
|
|
|
$
|
11.79
|
|
Capital Resources
Our principal subsidiary, City First, must comply with capital standards established by the OCC in the conduct of its business. Failure to comply with such capital requirements may result in
significant limitations on its business or other sanctions. As a “small bank holding company,” we are not subject to consolidated capital requirements under the new Basel III capital rules. The current regulatory capital requirements and
possible consequences of failure to maintain compliance are described in Part I, Item 1 “Business‑Regulation” and in Note 16 “Regulatory Matters” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Liquidity
The objective of liquidity management is to ensure that we have the continuing ability to fund operations and meet our obligations on a timely and cost-effective basis. The Bank’s sources of
funds include deposits, advances from the FHLB, other borrowings, proceeds from the sale of loans and investment securities, and payments of principal and interest on loans and investment securities. The Bank is currently approved by the FHLB
of Atlanta to borrow up to 25% of total assets to the extent the Bank provides qualifying collateral and holds sufficient FHLB stock. This approved limit and collateral requirement would have permitted the Bank to borrow an additional $174.3
million at December 31, 2024 based on pledged collateral. In addition, the Bank had additional lines of credit of $10.0 million with other financial institutions as of that date.
The Bank has a significant concentration of deposits with five long‑time customers that accounted for approximately 18% of its deposits as of December 31, 2024. In addition, the Bank has a
significant concentration of short-term borrowings from one customer that accounted for 88% of out the outstanding balance of securities sold under agreements to repurchase as of December 31, 2024. The Bank expects to maintain these
relationships with the customers for the foreseeable future.
As of December 31, 2024, approximately $268.8 million of our total deposits (including deposits from affiliates) were not insured by FDIC insurance, which represented 32% of total deposits.
The Bank’s primary uses of funds include withdrawals of and interest payments on deposits, originations of loans, purchases of investment securities, and the payment of operating expenses. Also,
when the Bank has more funds than required for reserve requirements or short‑term liquidity needs, the Bank invests excess cash with the Federal Reserve Bank or other financial institutions. The Bank’s liquid assets at December 31, 2024
consisted of $61.4 million in cash and cash equivalents and $17.6 million in securities available‑for‑sale that were not pledged, compared to $105.2 million in cash and cash equivalents and $186.0 million in securities available‑for‑sale that
were not pledged at December 31, 2023. We believe that the Bank has sufficient liquidity to support growth over the foreseeable future.
The Company’s liquidity, separate from the Bank, is based primarily on the proceeds from financing transactions, such as the preferred stock sold to the U.S. Treasury in 2022 and the private
placements completed in December 2016 and April 2021, and dividends received from the Bank in 2023 and 2024.
The Company recorded consolidated net cash inflows from operating activities of $1.4 million and $7.6 million during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Net
cash inflows from operating activities during 2024 were primarily attributable to net income of $2.0 million, a $1.4 million increase in other assets and a $641 thousand net change in deferred loan origination costs, partially
offset by a $3.1 million net decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities. Net cash inflows from operating activities during 2023 were primarily attributable to net income of $4.5 million and a $2.3
million net increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities.
The Company recorded consolidated net cash inflows from investing activities of $28.2 million and outflows from investing activities of $100.0 million during the years ended
December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Net cash inflows from investing activities during 2024 were primarily attributable to $117.1 of principal payments and maturities on available-for-sale securities, partially offset by $89.3 million
of net loan originations. Net cash outflows from investing activities during 2023 were primarily attributable to $115.3 million of net loan originations.
The Company recorded consolidated net cash outflows from financing activities of $73.4 million and inflows from financing activities of $181.5 million during the years ended
December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Net cash outflows from financing activities during 2024 were primarily attributable to $352.8 million of FHLB repayments, $100.0 million of BTFP repayments, and $14.0 million notes payable
repayments, partially offset by $339.0 million of proceeds from FHLB advances and a $62.8 million net increase in deposits. Net cash inflows from financing activities during 2023 were primarily attributable to
$456.1 million of proceeds from FHLB advances and $100.0 million of proceeds from the BTFP, partially offset by $375.1 million of FHLB repayments.
We believe that the Company’s existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to meet our liquidity requirements and capital expenditure needs over at least the next
12 months.
Off‑Balance‑Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
We are party to financial instruments with off‑balance‑sheet risk in the normal course of our business, primarily in order to meet the financing needs of our customers. These instruments
involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. In accordance with GAAP, these instruments are either not recorded in the consolidated financial statements or are recorded in amounts that differ from the
notional amounts. Such instruments primarily include lending commitments and lease commitments as described below.
Lending commitments include commitments to originate loans and to fund lines of credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer if there is no violation of any
condition established in the commitment. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee by the borrower. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn
upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate creditworthiness on a case‑by‑case basis. Our maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the contractual amount of the instruments.
In addition to our lending commitments, we have contractual obligations related to operating lease commitments. Operating lease commitments are obligations under various non‑cancellable
operating leases on buildings and land used for office space and banking purposes. The following table details our contractual obligations at December 31, 2024.
|
|
Less Than
One Year
|
|
|
More Than
One Year to
Three
Years
|
|
|
More Than
Three Years to
Five Years
|
|
|
More Than
Five Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
$
|
201,342
|
|
|
$
|
10,186
|
|
|
$
|
1,275
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
212,839
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
195,532
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
195,532
|
|
Commitments to originate loans
|
|
|
6,255
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
6,255
|
|
Commitments to fund construction loans
|
|
|
40,724
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
40,724
|
|
Commitments to fund unused lines of credit
|
|
|
3,659
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3,659
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
447,754
|
|
|
$
|
10,368
|
|
|
$
|
1,275
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
459,433
|
|
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
Our consolidated financial statements, including accompanying notes, have been prepared in accordance with GAAP which require the measurement of financial position and operating results
primarily in terms of historical dollars without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in increased costs of our operations. Unlike industrial
companies, nearly all our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on our performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the
same direction or to the same extent as the price of goods and services.
As a result, the Bank’s performance is influenced by general macroeconomic conditions, both domestic and foreign, the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government, and the policies of
the regulatory agencies. The Federal Reserve implements national monetary policies (such as seeking to curb inflation and combat recession) by its open-market operations in U.S. government securities, by adjusting the required level of
reserves for financial institutions subject to its reserve requirements, and by varying the discount rate applicable to borrowings by banks from the Federal Reserve Banks. The actions of the Federal Reserve in these areas can influence the
growth of loans, investments, and deposits, and also affect interest rates charged on loans and deposits. The nature and impact of any future changes in monetary policies cannot be predicted.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Critical accounting estimates are those that involve a significant level of estimation uncertainty, and which have had or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on the financial
condition or results of operations of the registrant. This discussion highlights those accounting estimates that management considers critical. All accounting policies are important, however, and therefore you are encouraged to review each of
the policies included in Note 1 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements to gain a better understanding of how our financial performance is measured and reported. Management has identified
the Company’s critical accounting estimates as follows:
Allowance for Credit Losses
In originating loans, we recognize that losses may be experienced on loans and that the risk of loss may vary as a result of many factors, including the type of loan being made, the
creditworthiness of the borrower, general economic conditions and, in the case of a secured loan, the quality of the collateral for the loan. Effective January 1, 2023, the Company accounts for the ACL on loans in accordance with ASC 326,
which requires the Company to recognize estimates for lifetime losses on loans and off-balance sheet loan commitments at the time of origination or acquisition. The recognition of losses at origination or acquisition represents the
Company’s best estimate of the lifetime expected credit loss associated with a loan, given the facts and circumstances associated with the particular loan, and involves the use of significant management judgment and estimates, which are
subject to change based on management’s on-going assessment of the credit quality of the loan portfolio and changes in economic forecasts used in the model. The Company uses the weighted-average remaining maturity (“WARM”) method when
determining estimates for the ACL for each of its portfolio segments. The weighted average remaining life, including the effect of estimated prepayments, is calculated for each loan pool on a quarterly basis. The Company then estimates a
loss rate for each pool using both its own historical loss experience and the historical losses of a group of peer institutions during the period from 2004 through the most recent quarter.
The Company’s ACL model also includes adjustments for qualitative factors, where appropriate. Qualitative adjustments may include, but are not limited to, factors such as: (i) changes in lending
policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and collections, charge offs, and recovery practices; (ii) changes in international, national, regional, and local conditions; (iii) changes in the nature and volume of the
portfolio and terms of loans; (iv) changes in the experience, depth, and ability of lending management; (v) changes in the volume and severity of past due loans and other similar conditions; (vi) changes in the quality of the organization’s
loan review system; (vii) changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans; (viii) the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the levels of such concentrations; and (ix) the effect of
other external factors (i.e., competition, legal and regulatory requirements) on the level of estimated credit losses. These qualitative factors incorporate the concept of reasonable and supportable forecasts, as required by ASC 326.
The Company has a credit portfolio review process designed to detect problem loans. Problem loans are typically those of a substandard or worse internal risk grade, and may consist of loans on
nonaccrual status, loans that have recently been modified in response to a borrower’s deteriorating financial condition, loans where the likelihood of foreclosure on underlying collateral has increased, collateral dependent loans, and other
loans where concern or doubt over the ultimate collectability of all contractual amounts due has become elevated. Such loans may, in the opinion of management, be deemed to no longer possess risk characteristics similar to other loans in the
loan portfolio, because the specific attributes and risks associated with the loan have likely become unique as the credit quality of the loan deteriorates. As such, these loans may require individual evaluation to determine an appropriate
ACL for the loan. When a loan is individually evaluated, the Company typically measures the expected credit loss for the loan based on a discounted cash flow approach, unless the loan has been deemed collateral dependent. Collateral dependent
loans are loans where the repayment of the loan is expected to come from the operation of and/or eventual liquidation of the underlying collateral. The ACL for collateral dependent loans is determined using estimates of the fair value of the
underlying collateral, less estimated selling costs.
The estimation of the appropriate level of the ACL requires significant judgment by management. Although management uses the best information available to make these estimations, future
adjustments to the ACL may be necessary due to economic, operating, regulatory, and other conditions that may extend beyond the Company’s control. Changes in management’s estimates of forecasted net losses could materially change the level of
the ACL. Additionally, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s ACL and credit review process. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the ACL
based on judgments different from those of management.
Goodwill
The excess of consideration paid over fair value of net assets acquired for acquisitions is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested at
least annually for impairment or more frequently if events occur or circumstances change that indicate impairment may exist. A goodwill impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value.
An impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. A weighted average of both the market and income approaches is used in valuing the reporting unit’s fair value. Weightings
are assigned to the approaches regarding fair value and the sensitivity of other weighting scenarios is considered. The market approach incorporates comparable public company information, valuation multiples and consideration of a market
control premium along with data related to comparable observed purchase transactions in the financial services industry. The income approach consists of discounting projected future cash flows, which are derived from internal forecasts and
economic expectations for the reporting unit. The significant inputs and assumptions for the income approach include a discount rate and projected earnings of the Company in future years for which there is inherent uncertainty. The
sensitivity of a range of reasonable discount rates based on the current economic environment is considered.
Our quantitative annual impairment tests as of September 30, 2024 and 2023 did not result in impairment. However, changing economic conditions that may
adversely affect the Company’s performance, the fair value of its assets and liabilities, or its stock price could result in future impairment. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial
condition and results of operations. Management will continue to monitor events that could influence this conclusion in the future. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”
for further information.
The Company’s accounting policies and discussion of recent accounting pronouncements is included in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
ITEM 7A. |
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information requested by this item pursuant to Item 305(e) of Regulation S-K.
ITEM 8. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements of Broadway Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries below.
ITEM 9. |
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
ITEM 9A. |
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of December 31, 2023, an evaluation was performed under the supervision of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) and Principal
Financial Officer (“PFO”) of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s PEO and PFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of December 31, 2024.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of Broadway Financial Corporation is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company as defined in Rule 13a 15(f) under the Exchange Act. This system, which management has chosen to base on the criteria for effective internal control over
financial reporting established in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013),” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”), and which is effected by the Company’s Board of Directors,
management and other personnel, is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records
that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the Directors of the Company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance and may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Further, because of changes in conditions, effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting may vary over time.
With the participation of the Company’s PEO and PFO, management has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s system of
internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, management determined that the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2024.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over
financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
Remediation of Previously Identified Material Weakness
Management has concluded that the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting initially described in Part I, Item 4 “Controls
and Procedures,” of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2023 (the “Q3 2023 Form 10-Q”) has been remediated as of December 31, 2024. As described the Q3 2023 Form 10-Q, the Company has hired additional senior
personnel with relevant finance and accounting experience and implemented its strengthened processes relating to (including additional testing by the Company’s internal audit firm of) general ledger account reconciliations. Management has
evaluated these enhanced controls and has concluded they were designed and implemented and are operating effectively.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange
Act) that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2024 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives as specified above. Management
does not expect, however, that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent or detect all error and fraud. Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, is based upon certain assumptions, and can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives will be met. Further, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud,
if any, within the Company have been detected.
ITEM 9B. |
OTHER INFORMATION
|
None.
ITEM 9C. |
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
|
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10. |
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement, under the captions “Election of Directors,” “Executive Officers,” “Code of Ethics,”
and, if applicable, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management,” that will be filed with the SEC in connection with the Company’s 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Company’s Proxy Statement”).
ITEM 11. |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement, under the captions “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation.”
ITEM 12. |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement, under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.”
ITEM 13. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement, under the captions “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Election of
Directors.”
ITEM 14. |
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement, under the caption “Ratification on An Advisory (Non-Binding) Basis of the Appointment
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
PART IV
ITEM 15. |
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
(a) |
1. See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
2. Financial Statement Schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes
thereto included under Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Exhibit
Number*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant (Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on April 5, 2021)
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant (Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on November 1, 2023)
|
|
|
Bylaws of Registrant (Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8‑K filed by Registrant on August 24, 2020)
|
|
|
Certificate of Designations for the Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock (Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on September 11, 2019)
|
|
|
Certificate of Designations of Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C (Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on June 8, 2022)
|
|
|
Description of Registrant’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-K filed by Registrant on April 15, 2022)
|
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of September 10, 2019, entered between Broadway Financial Corporation and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as rights agent (Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed by
Registrant on September 11, 2019)
|
|
|
Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of August 25, 2020, entered between Broadway Financial Corporation and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K file by
Registrant on August 26, 2020)
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on June 8, 2022)
|
|
|
Broadway Federal Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10‑K filed by Registrant on March 28, 2016)
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Broadway Financial Corporation 2008 Long Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10‑Q filed by Registrant on August 12, 2016)
|
|
|
Amended Form of Award Agreement for stock options granted pursuant to Amended and Restated Broadway Financial Corporation 2008 Long‑Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10‑Q filed
by Registrant on August 12, 2016)
|
|
|
Broadway Financial Corporation Amended and Restated 2018 Long‑Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-K filed by Registrant on May 20, 2024)
|
|
|
Form of Award Agreement for restricted stock granted pursuant to Broadway Financial Corporation Amended and Restated 2018 Long‑Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-K filed by
Registrant on May 20, 2024)
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2017, for Brenda J. Battey (Exhibit 10.11 to Form 10-K filed by Registrant on March 29, 2019)
|
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement for Brenda J. Battey, dated as of January 14, 2020 (Exhibit 10.1 to form 8-K filed by Registrant on January 14, 2021)
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2017, for Ruth McCloud (Exhibit 10.13 to Form 10-K filed by Registrant on March 29, 2019)
|
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement for Ruth McCloud, dated as of January 14, 2020 (Exhibit 10.3 to form 8-K filed by Registrant on January 14, 2021)
|
|
|
Broadway Federal Bank Incentive Compensation Plan (Exhibit 10.14 to Form 10-K filed by the Registrant on March 31, 2021)
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated and effective as of November 17, 2021, between Registrant and Brian E. Argrett (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on November 18, 2021)
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2016, entered between First Republic Bank and Registrant (Exhibit 10.8 to Form 10‑K filed by Registrant on March 27, 2017)
|
|
|
ESOP Loan Agreement and ESOP Pledge Agreement, each dated as of December 19, 2016, entered into between Registrant and Miguel Paredes, as trustee for the Broadway Federal Bank, f.s.b.,
Employee Stock Ownership Plan Trust, and related Promissory Note, dated as of December 19, 2016 (Exhibit 10.12 to Form 10‑K filed by Registrant on March 27, 2017)
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2020, entered between Banc of America Strategic Investments Corporation and Registrant (Exhibit 10.15 to Registration Statement on S-4
filed by Registrant on January 19, 2021)
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2020, entered between Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and Registrant (Exhibit 10.14 to Registration Statement on S-4 filed by Registrant on
January 19, 2021)
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 24, 2020, entered between Wells Fargo Central Pacific Holdings, Inc. and Registrant (Exhibit 10.16 to Registration Statement on S-4 filed
by Registrant on January 19, 2021)
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2021, entered between Ally Ventures, a business unit of Ally Financial Inc., and Registrant (Exhibit 10.24 to Form 10-K filed by
Registrant on March 31, 2021)
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2021, entered between Banner Bank and Registrant (Exhibit 10.25 to Form 10-K filed by Registrant on March 31, 2021)
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2021, entered between Citicorp Banking Corporation and Registrant (Exhibit 10.26 to Form 10-K filed by Registrant on March 31, 2021)
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2021, entered between First Republic Bank and Registrant (Exhibit 10.8 to Form 10‑K filed by Registrant on March 31, 2021)
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2021, entered between Gerald I. White and Registrant (Exhibit 10.28 to Form 10-K filed by Registrant on March 31, 2021)
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2021, entered between Gerald I. White, in his capacity as the trustee for the Grace & White, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan, and
Registrant (Exhibit 10.29 to Form 10-K filed by Registrant on March 31, 2021)
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2021, entered between Registrant and Butterfield Trust (Bermuda) Limited as trustee of each of the following: The Lorraine Grace Will
Trust, The Anne Grace Kelly Trust 99, The Gwendolyn Grace Trust 99, The Lorraine L. Grace Trust 99, and The Ruth Grace Jervis Millennium Trust (Exhibit 10.30 to Form 10-K filed by Registrant on March 31, 2021)
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2021, entered between Texas Capital Community Development Corporation and Registrant (Exhibit 10.31 to Form 10-K filed by Registrant on
March 31, 2021)
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2021, entered between J.P. Morgan Chase Community Development Corporation and Registrant (Exhibit 10.32 to Form 10-K filed by
Registrant on March 31, 2021)
|
|
|
Letter Agreement and Securities Purchase Agreement, dated June 7, 2022 (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed by Registrant on June 8, 2022)
|
|
|
Insider Trading Policy
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Consent of Moss Adams LLP
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
Compensation Clawback Policy (Exhibit 97.1 to Form 10-K filed by Registrant on May 20, 2024)
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
Inline XBRL Instance Document
|
101.SCH
|
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
101.CAL
|
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
101.DEF
|
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document
|
101.LAB
|
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
101.PRE
|
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
104
|
|
The cover page from this Annual Report on Form 10-K, formatted in Inline XBRL (included as Exhibit 101).
|
** |
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
ITEM 16. |
FORM 10-K SUMMARY
|
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ BRIAN ARGRETT
|
|
|
Brian Argrett
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Date:
|
March 31, 2025
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
/s/ BRIAN ARGRETT
|
Date: March 31, 2025
|
Brian Argrett
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
|
/s/ ZACK IBRAHIM
|
Date: March 31, 2025
|
Zack Ibrahim
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ WAYNE-KENT A. BRADSHAW
|
Date: March 31, 2025
|
Wayne-Kent A. Bradshaw
|
|
Vice Chairman of the Board
|
|
/s/ MARIE C. JOHNS
|
Date: March 31, 2025
|
Marie C. Johns
|
|
Lead Independent Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ WILLIAM A. LONGBRAKE
|
Date: March 31, 2025
|
William A. Longbrake
|
|
Audit Committee Chairman
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROBERT C. DAVIDSON, JR.
|
Date: March 31, 2025
|
Robert C. Davidson, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ MARY ANN DONOVAN
|
Date: March 31, 2025
|
Mary Ann Donovan
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ DAVID J. MCGRADY
|
Date: March 31, 2025
|
David J. McGrady
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ DUTCH C. ROSS III
|
Date: March 31, 2025
|
Dutch C. Ross III
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOHN M. DRIVER
|
Date: March 31, 2025
|
John M. Driver
|
|
Director
|
|
BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors
Broadway Financial Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Broadway Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in
stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively, referred to as the consolidated financial statements). In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023,
and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)
and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial
reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in
the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated
or required to be communicated to the audit committee, and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements, and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments.
The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinion on
the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Allowance for Credit Losses – Qualitative Factors
As described in Note 1 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements, as of December 31, 2024, the Company’s allowance for credit losses – loans was $8.1
million. Estimating expected credit losses requires management to use relevant forward-looking information, including the use of reasonable and supportable forecasts. The Company’s model also includes adjustments for qualitative factors that
include, but are not limited to, (i) changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and collections, charge offs, and recovery practices; (ii) changes in international, national, regional, and local
conditions; (iii) changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio and terms of loans; (iv) changes in the experience, depth, and ability of lending management; (v) changes in the volume and severity of past due loans and other similar
conditions; (vi) changes in the quality of the organization’s loan review system; (vii) changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans; (viii) the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes
in the levels of such concentrations; and (ix) the effect of other external factors (i.e., competition, legal and regulatory requirements) on the level of estimated credit losses.
We identified the auditing of the adjustments for qualitative factors used in the allowance for credit losses – loans as a critical audit matter. The qualitative
factors are used to estimate credit losses related to matters that are not captured in the historical loss component of the allowance and requires significant management judgement based on management’s evaluation of available internal and
external data. Auditing management’s judgements regarding the adjustments for qualitative factors involved significant audit effort, as well as especially challenging and subjective auditor judgement.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial
statements. Our audit procedures related to the adjustments for qualitative factors used in the allowance for credit losses - loans included the following, among others:
|
•
|
Evaluating the methodology used.
|
|
•
|
Testing the completeness and accuracy of the data used in the calculation, application of the adjustments for qualitative factors determined by management, and
recalculation of the allowance for credit losses balance.
|
|
•
|
Evaluating whether the adjustments for the qualitative factors used in the calculation are supported by the analysis provided by management.
|
|
•
|
Evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used including relevance and reliability of external data sources.
|
Valuation of Goodwill
As described in note 1 and note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company assesses goodwill for impairment annually as of September 30 or more
frequently if events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. A goodwill impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value. An impairment charge is recorded for the amount by
which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. A weighted average of both the market and income approaches is used in valuing the reporting unit’s fair value. The Company’s goodwill balance was $25.9 million as of December
31, 2024.
We identified auditing the Company’s estimated fair value of the reporting unit as a critical audit matter. The performance of audit procedures related to
management’s estimate required extensive audit effort, including the use of our valuation specialists with specialized skill and knowledge pertaining to valuation techniques. Additionally, the evaluation of audit evidence of more sensitive
assumptions required especially challenging and subjective auditor judgement, including those assumptions underlying the projections of future cash flows utilized in the income approach, the selection of peer data utilized in the market
approach, and the relative weight assigned to the different valuation methodologies.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial
statements. Our audit procedures related to the Company’s estimated fair value of the reporting unit included the following, among others:
•
|
Testing the Company’s process used to develop the estimate.
|
•
|
Evaluating the appropriateness of the methods used.
|
• |
Evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used, including the relative weight assigned to income and market approaches.
|
• |
Testing the completeness, accuracy, and reliability of underlying data used in the Company’s analysis.
|
• |
Utilizing our valuation professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in evaluating the methods and the reasonableness of certain significant assumptions
used.
|
/s/ Moss Adams LLP
Spokane, Washington
March 31, 2025
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.
BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition
|
|
December 31,
2024
|
|
|
December 31,
2023
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share
and per share)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
2,255
|
|
|
$
|
5,460
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks
|
|
|
59,110
|
|
|
|
99,735
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
61,365
|
|
|
|
105,195
|
|
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost of $219,658 and $335,978)
|
|
|
203,862
|
|
|
|
316,950
|
|
Loans receivable held for investment, net of allowance of $8,103 and $7,348
|
|
|
968,861
|
|
|
|
880,457
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
5,001
|
|
|
|
4,938
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock
|
|
|
9,637
|
|
|
|
10,156
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) stock
|
|
|
3,543
|
|
|
|
3,543
|
|
Office properties and equipment, net
|
|
|
8,899
|
|
|
|
9,185
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
3,321
|
|
|
|
3,275
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
8,803
|
|
|
|
9,538
|
|
Core deposit intangible, net
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
|
2,111
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
25,858
|
|
|
|
25,858
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,786
|
|
|
|
4,198
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,303,711
|
|
|
$
|
1,375,404
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
745,399
|
|
|
$
|
682,635
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
66,610 |
|
|
|
73,475 |
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
195,532
|
|
|
|
209,319
|
|
Bank Term Funding Program borrowing
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
10,794 |
|
|
|
13,878 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,018,335
|
|
|
|
1,093,307
|
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred stock,
Series C; authorized 150,000 shares at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023; issued and outstanding 150,000 shares at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023; liquidation value $1,000 per share
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Common stock, Class A, $0.01 par value, voting; authorized 75,000,000
shares at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023; issued 6,349,455 shares at December 31, 2024 and 6,242,089 shares at December 31, 2023; outstanding 6,022,227 shares at December 31, 2024 and 5,914,861 shares at December 31, 2023
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Common stock, Class B, $0.01 par value, non-voting; authorized 15,000,000 shares at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023; issued and outstanding 1,425,574
shares at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Common stock, Class C, $0.01
par value, non-voting; authorized 25,000,000 shares at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023; issued and outstanding
1,672,562 at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
142,902
|
|
|
|
142,601
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
12,911
|
|
|
|
12,552
|
|
Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) shares
|
|
|
(4,201
|
)
|
|
|
(4,492
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
|
|
(11,223
|
)
|
|
|
(13,525
|
)
|
Treasury stock-at cost, 327,228
shares at December 31, 2024 and at December 31, 2023
|
|
|
(5,326
|
)
|
|
|
(5,326
|
)
|
Total Broadway Financial Corporation and Subsidiary stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
285,157
|
|
|
|
281,903
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
1,303,711
|
|
|
$
|
1,375,404
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated
Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans receivable
|
|
$
|
48,807
|
|
|
$
|
37,143
|
|
Interest on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
7,034
|
|
|
|
8,697
|
|
Other interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits
|
|
|
13,183
|
|
|
|
7,512
|
|
Interest on borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,769
|
|
|
|
29,462
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit
losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
4,156
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
17,562
|
|
|
|
15,653
|
|
Occupancy expense
|
|
|
1,858
|
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
Information services
|
|
|
2,763
|
|
|
|
2,777
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
3,449
|
|
|
|
3,126
|
|
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
Corporate insurance
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
Amortization of core deposit intangible
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
2,765
|
|
|
|
6,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Net income attributable to Broadway Financial Corporation
|
|
$ |
1,926 |
|
|
$ |
4,514 |
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
359 |
|
|
$ |
4,514 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale arising during the period
|
|
$
|
3,232
|
|
|
$
|
5,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share-basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share-diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated
Statements of
Changes in
Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands, except share and per share)
|
|
Preferred Stock Non-Voting
|
|
|
Common Stock Voting
|
|
|
Common Stock Non-Voting
|
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
Unearned ESOP Shares
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Non-
Controlling Interest
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2022
|
|
$ |
150,000
|
|
|
$ |
64
|
|
|
$ |
31
|
|
|
$ |
144,157
|
|
|
$ |
(17,473
|
)
|
|
$ |
9,294
|
|
|
$ |
(1,265
|
)
|
|
$ |
(5,326
|
)
|
|
$ |
170
|
|
|
$ |
279,652
|
|
Cumulative effect of change related to adoption of ASU 2016-13
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1,256
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1,256
|
)
|
Adjusted balance, January 1, 2023
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
144,157
|
|
|
|
(17,473
|
)
|
|
|
8,038
|
|
|
|
(1,265
|
)
|
|
|
(5,326
|
)
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
278,396
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
4,514
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
4,538
|
|
Increase in unreleased shares
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(3,400
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(3,400
|
)
|
Release of unearned ESOP shares
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
Director stock compensation expense
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Share repurchase - FDIC
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1,781
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1,781
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3,948
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3,948
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2023
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
142,601
|
|
|
|
(13,525
|
)
|
|
|
12,552
|
|
|
|
(4,492
|
)
|
|
|
(5,326
|
)
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
282,097
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,926 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
1,951 |
|
Release of unearned ESOP shares
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
188 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
309 |
|
Director stock compensation expense
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Dividends declared and paid - Emergency Capital Investment Program (“ECIP”)
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(1,567 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(1,567 |
) |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2024
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
142,902 |
|
|
$ |
(11,223 |
) |
|
$ |
12,911 |
|
|
$ |
(4,201 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,326 |
) |
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
285,376 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated
Statements of
Cash Flows
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,951
|
|
|
$
|
4,538
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
933
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
Net change of deferred loan origination costs
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
Net accretion of premiums and discounts on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
(807
|
)
|
|
|
(1,044
|
)
|
Accretion of purchase accounting marks on loans
|
|
|
(424
|
)
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
Amortization of core deposit intangible
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
Director compensation expense-common stock
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Accretion of premium on FHLB advances
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
ESOP compensation expense
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Earnings on bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Net change in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(965
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,412
|
|
|
|
(677
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(3,084
|
)
|
|
|
2,287
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,393
|
|
|
|
7,594
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in loans receivable held for investment
|
|
|
(89,285
|
)
|
|
|
(115,331
|
)
|
Principal payments and maturities on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
117,127
|
|
|
|
18,395
|
|
Purchase of FHLB stock
|
|
|
(13,654
|
)
|
|
|
(13,287
|
)
|
Proceeds from redemption of FHLB stock
|
|
|
14,173
|
|
|
|
8,667
|
|
Proceeds from redemption of FRB stock
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,720
|
|
Purchase of office properties and equipment
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
28,223
|
|
|
|
(100,044
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in deposits
|
|
|
62,764
|
|
|
|
(4,281
|
)
|
Net change in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(6,865
|
)
|
|
|
10,004
|
|
Increase in unreleased ESOP shares
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(3,400
|
)
|
Repayments of Bank Term Funding Program
|
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
Proceeds from Bank Term Funding Program
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Repayment of notes payable
|
|
|
(14,000 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
Dividends paid on ECIP preferred stock
|
|
|
(1,567
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
Share repurchase - FDIC
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1,781
|
)
|
Proceeds from FHLB advances
|
|
|
339,000
|
|
|
|
456,138
|
|
Repayments of FHLB advances
|
|
|
(352,778
|
)
|
|
|
(375,140
|
)
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(73,446
|
)
|
|
|
181,540
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(43,830
|
)
|
|
|
89,090
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
|
|
|
105,195
|
|
|
|
16,105
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
|
|
$
|
61,365
|
|
|
$
|
105,195
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
30,628
|
|
|
$
|
16,921
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2024 and 2023
Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations and Principles of Consolidation
Broadway Financial Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated under Delaware law in 1995 for the purpose of acquiring
and holding all of the outstanding capital stock of Broadway Federal Savings and Loan Association as part of the bank’s conversion from a federally chartered mutual savings association to a federally chartered stock savings bank. In connection
with the conversion, the bank’s name was changed to Broadway Federal Bank, f.s.b. (“Broadway Federal”). The conversion was completed, and Broadway Federal became a wholly‑owned subsidiary of the Company, in January 1996.
On April 1, 2021, the Company completed its merger with CFBanc Corporation, with the Company continuing as the surviving
entity. Immediately following the CFBanc Merger, Broadway Federal merged with and into City First Bank of D.C, National Association with City First Bank of D.C., National Association (the“Bank”) continuing as the surviving entity (combined with
Broadway Federal). Concurrently with the Merger, the Bank changed its name to City First Bank, National Association.
The Bank’s business is that of a financial intermediary and consists primarily of attracting deposits from the general
public and using such deposits, together with borrowings and other funds, to make mortgage loans secured by residential and commercial real estate located in the Bank’s market areas. At December 31, 2024, the Bank operated three retail‑banking offices: Los Angeles and in the nearby city of Inglewood in California, and another in Washington, D.C. The Bank is subject to
significant competition from other financial institutions and is also subject to regulation by certain federal agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include Broadway Financial Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary,
City First Bank, National Association (together with the Company, “City First Broadway”). Also included in the consolidated financial statements are the following subsidiaries of City First Bank: 1432 U Street LLC, Broadway Service Corporation,
City First Real Estate LLC, City First Real Estate II LLC, City First Real Estate III LLC, City First Real Estate IV LLC, and CF New Markets Advisors, LLC (“CFNMA”). In addition, CFNMA also consolidates CFC Fund Manager II, LLC; City First New
Markets Fund II, LLC; and City First Capital IX, LLC into its financial results. The results of Broadway Service Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, are also included in the consolidated financial statements. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain amounts in the prior year financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on
total shareholders’ equity or net income for any period.
Out-of-Period Adjustments
Following the quarter ended September 30, 2023, the Company performed a review of internal controls over financial reporting, encompassing an examination of
financial reporting processes. During this assessment and while preparing financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023, certain previously unrecorded adjustments totaling $8 thousand, net of tax expense, increasing net income were identified pertaining to prior periods. In accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Nos. 99 and 108,
these adjustments were evaluated both individually and collectively. Following this assessment, management determined these adjustments were immaterial to both historical and current reporting periods. Consequently, the Company determined that
no amendment to the previously filed reports was warranted. However, recognizing the importance of transparency and accuracy, the Company addressed these prior period adjustments and incorporated them into its financial statements for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2023. These adjustments are included in the Other Expense line item on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
Use of Estimates
To prepare consolidated financial statements in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the
disclosures provided, and actual results could differ from these estimates. The allowance and provision for credit losses, deferred tax asset valuation allowance, and fair values of investment securities and other financial instruments are
particularly subject to change.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash items in the process of collection, amounts due from correspondent banks and the Federal Reserve Bank of San
Francisco (the “Federal Reserve Bank”), and interest‑bearing deposits in other banks with initial terms of ninety days or less. The Company may be required to maintain reserve and clearing balances with the Federal Reserve Bank under the Federal
Reserve Act of 1913, as amended. Effective on March 26, 2020, as a part of Federal Reserve Bank’s tools to promote maximum employment, Federal Reserve Bank Board reduced reserve requirement ratios to zero. The reserve and clearing requirement
balance were no longer required at December 31, 2024. Net cash flows are reported for customer loan and deposit transactions, interest‑bearing deposits in other banks, notes payable, deferred income taxes and other assets and liabilities.
Investment Securities
Debt securities are classified as held‑to‑maturity and carried at amortized cost when management has the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Debt
securities are classified as available‑for‑sale when they might be sold before maturity. Securities available‑for‑sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax.
Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts on securities are amortized on the level‑yield method without
anticipating prepayments. Gains and losses on sales are recorded on the trade date and determined using the specific identification method.
The Company accounts for the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) on securities in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 326 (“ASC 326”) – Financial Instruments-Credit Losses. The ACL on securities is recorded at the time of purchase or acquisition, representing the Company’s best estimate of current expected credit losses (“CECL”) as of the date
of the consolidated statements of financial condition.
For available-for-sale investment securities, the Company performs a qualitative evaluation for those securities that are in an unrealized loss position to
determine if the decline in fair value is credit related or non-credit related. In determining whether a security’s decline in fair value is credit related, the Company considers a number of factors including, but not limited to: (i) the extent
to which the fair value of the investment is less than its amortized cost; (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer; (iii) any downgrades in credit ratings; (iv) the payment structure of the security; (v) the ability of
the issuer of the security to make scheduled principal and interest payments; and (vi) general market conditions which reflect prospects for the economy as a whole, including interest rates and sector credit spreads. For investment securities
where the Company has reason to believe the credit loss exposure is remote, a zero credit loss assumption is applied. Such investment securities typically consist of those guaranteed by the U.S. government or other government enterprises, where
there is an explicit or implicit guarantee by the U.S. government, that are highly rated by rating agencies, and historically have had no credit loss experience.
If it is determined that the unrealized loss, or a portion thereof, is credit related, the Company records the amount of credit loss through a charge to the
provision for credit losses in current period earnings. However, the amount of credit loss recorded in current period earnings is limited to the amount of the total unrealized loss on the security, which is measured as the amount by which the
security’s fair value is below its amortized cost. If the Company intends to sell a security that is in an unrealized loss position, or if it is more likely than not the Company will be required to sell a security in an unrealized loss position,
the total amount of the unrealized loss is recognized in current period earnings through the provision for credit losses. Unrealized losses deemed non-credit related are recorded, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
The Company analyzed available-for-sale investment securities that were in an unrealized loss position and determined the decline in fair value for those securities
was not related to credit, but rather related to changes in interest rates and general market conditions. As such, no ACL was
recorded for available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Loans Receivable Held for Investment
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at the principal balance outstanding,
net of allowance for credit losses, deferred loan fees and costs and unamortized premiums and discounts. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct loan origination costs, premiums and
discounts are deferred, and recognized in income using the level‑yield method without anticipating prepayments.
Interest income on all loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90
days delinquent unless the loan is well‑secured and in process of collection. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on non‑accrual or charged‑off at an earlier date if collection of
principal or interest is considered doubtful.
All interest accrued but not received for loans placed on non‑accrual is reversed against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on the
cash‑basis or cost recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Concentrations of credit risk arise when several customers are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or
have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. The Company’s lending activities are predominantly in real estate loans that are secured
by properties located in Southern California and in Washington, D.C. and many of the borrowers reside in those areas. Therefore, the Company’s exposure to credit risk is significantly affected by changes in the economy and real estate market in
the markets in which the Company operates.
Purchased Credit Deteriorated Loans
Prior to the adoption of ASC 326, loans that were purchased in a business combination that showed evidence of credit deterioration since their origination and for
which it was probable, at acquisition, that not all contractually required payments would be collected were classified as purchased-credit impaired (“PCI”). The Company accounted for PCI loans and associated income recognition in accordance with
ASC Subtopic 310-30 – Receivables-Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. Upon acquisition, the Company measured the amount by which the undiscounted expected future cash
flows on PCI loans exceeded the estimated fair value of the loan as the “accretable yield,” representing the amount of estimated future interest income on the loan. The amount of accretable yield was re-measured at each financial reporting date,
representing the difference between the remaining undiscounted expected cash flows and the current carrying value of the PCI loan. The accretable yield on PCI loans was recognized in interest income using the interest method.
Following the adoption of ASC 326 on January 1, 2023, the Company analyzes all acquired loans at the time of acquisition for more-than-insignificant deterioration
in credit quality since their origination date. Such loans are classified as purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loans. Acquired loans classified as PCD are recorded at an initial amortized cost, which is comprised of the purchase price of the
loans and the initial ACL determined for the loans, which is added to the purchase price, and any resulting discount or premium related to factors other than credit. PCI loans were considered to be PCD loans at the date of adoption of ASC 326.
The Company accounts for interest income on PCD loans using the interest method, whereby any purchase discounts or premiums are accreted or amortized into interest income as an adjustment of the loan’s yield. An accretable yield is not determined
for PCD loans.
Allowance for Credit Losses - Loans
The Company accounts for credit losses on loans in accordance with ASC 326, which requires the Company to record an estimate of expected lifetime credit losses for
loans at the time of origination or acquisition. The ACL is maintained at a level deemed appropriate by management to provide for expected credit losses in the portfolio as of the date of the consolidated statements of financial condition.
Estimating expected credit losses requires management to use relevant forward-looking information, including the use of reasonable and supportable forecasts. The measurement of the ACL is performed by collectively evaluating loans with similar
risk characteristics. The Company measures the ACL for each of its loan segments using the weighted-average remaining maturity (“WARM”) method. The weighted average remaining life, including the effect of estimated prepayments, is calculated for
each loan pool on a quarterly basis. The Company then estimates a loss rate for each pool using both its own historical loss experience and the historical losses of a group of peer institutions during the period from 2004 through the most recent
quarter.
The Company’s ACL model also includes adjustments for qualitative factors, where appropriate. Since historical information (such as historical net losses) may not
always, by itself, provide a sufficient basis for determining future expected credit losses, the Company periodically considers the need for qualitative adjustments to the ACL. Qualitative adjustments may include, but are not limited to factors
such as: (i) changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and collections, charge offs, and recovery practices; (ii) changes in international, national, regional, and local conditions; (iii) changes in
the nature and volume of the portfolio and terms of loans; (iv) changes in the experience, depth, and ability of lending management; (v) changes in the volume and severity of past due loans and other similar conditions; (vi) changes in the
quality of the organization’s loan review system; (vii) changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans; (viii) the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the levels of such
concentrations; and (ix) the effect of other external factors (i.e., competition, legal and regulatory requirements) on the level of estimated credit losses.
The Company has a credit portfolio review process designed to detect problem loans. Problem loans are typically those of a substandard or worse internal risk grade,
and may consist of loans on nonaccrual status, loans that have recently been modified in response to a borrower’s deteriorating financial condition, loans where the likelihood of foreclosure on underlying collateral has increased, collateral
dependent loans, and other loans where concern or doubt over the ultimate collectability of all contractual amounts due has become elevated. Such loans may, in the opinion of management, be deemed to no longer possess risk characteristics similar
to other loans in the loan portfolio, because the specific attributes and risks associated with the loan have likely become unique as the credit quality of the loan deteriorates. As such, these loans may require individual evaluation to determine
an appropriate ACL for the loan. When a loan is individually evaluated, the Company typically measures the expected credit loss for the loan based on a discounted cash flow approach, unless the loan has been deemed collateral dependent.
Collateral dependent loans are loans where the repayment of the loan is expected to come from the operation of and/or eventual liquidation of the underlying collateral. The ACL for collateral dependent loans is determined using estimates of the
fair value of the underlying collateral, less estimated selling costs.
The estimation of the appropriate level of the ACL requires significant judgment by management. Although management uses the best information available to make these
estimates, future adjustments to the ACL may be necessary due to economic, operating, regulatory, and other conditions that may extend beyond the Company’s control. Changes in management’s estimates of forecasted net losses could materially
change the level of the ACL. Additionally, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s ACL and credit review process. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize
additions to the ACL based on judgments different from those of management.
The Company has segmented the loan portfolio according to loans that share similar attributes and risk characteristics. Each segment possesses varying degrees of
risk based on, among other things, the type of loan, the type of collateral, and the sensitivity of the borrower or industry to changes in external factors such as economic conditions. The Company determines the ACL for loans based on this more
detailed loan segmentation and classification. These segments, and the risks associated with each segment, are as follows:
Real Estate: Single-Family – Subject to adverse
employment conditions in the local economy leading to increased default rate, decreased market values from oversupply in a geographic area and incremental rate increases on adjustable-rate mortgages which may impact the ability of borrowers to
maintain payments.
Real Estate: Multi‑Family – Subject to adverse various
market conditions that cause a decrease in market value or lease rates, changes in personal funding sources for tenants, oversupply of units in a specific region, population shifts and reputational risks.
Real Estate: Commercial Real Estate – Subject to adverse conditions in the local
economy which may lead to reduced cash flows due to vacancies and reduced rental rates and decreases in the value of underlying collateral.
Real Estate: Church – Subject to adverse economic and employment conditions, which
may lead to reduced cash flows from members’ donations and offerings, and the stability, quality, and popularity of church leadership.
Real Estate: Construction – Subject to adverse conditions in the local economy,
which may lead to reduced demand for new commercial, multi‑family, or single-family buildings or reduced lease or sale opportunities once the building is complete.
Commercial and SBA Loans – Subject to industry and economic conditions including decreases in product demand.
Consumer – Subject to adverse employment conditions in the local economy, which may lead to higher default rates.
Modified Loans to Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty
In certain instances, the Company makes modifications to loans in order to alleviate temporary difficulties in the borrower’s financial condition and/or constraints on the borrower’s ability to repay the loan, and to minimize potential losses to
the Company. Modifications include: changes in the amortization terms of the loan, reductions in interest rates, acceptance of interest only payments, and reductions to the outstanding loan balance (or any combination of such changes). Such loans
are typically placed on nonaccrual status when there is doubt concerning the full repayment of principal and interest or the loan has been in default for a period of 90 days or more. Such loans may be returned to accrual status when all
contractual amounts past due have been brought current, and the borrower’s performance under the modified terms of the loan agreement and the ultimate collectability of all contractual amounts due under the modified terms is no longer in doubt.
The Company typically measures the ACL on these loans on an individual basis as the loans are deemed to no longer have risk characteristics that are similar to other loans in the portfolio. The determination of the ACL for these loans is based on
the remaining life approach, unless the loan is deemed collateral dependent, which requires measurement of the ACL based on the estimated expected fair value of the underlying collateral, less selling costs.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill is recorded upon completion of a business combination as the difference between the purchase price and the fair value of net identifiable assets acquired.
Subsequent to initial recognition, the Company tests goodwill for impairment annually as of September 30, or more often if events or circumstances, such as adverse changes in the business climate indicate there may be impairment. A goodwill
impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value. An impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. For goodwill
considerations the Company is a single reporting unit. A weighted average of both the market and income approaches is used in valuing the reporting unit’s fair value. Weightings are assigned to the approaches regarding fair value and the
sensitivity of other weighting scenarios is considered. The market approach incorporates comparable public company information, valuation multiples and consideration of a market control premium along with data related to comparable observed
purchase transactions in the financial services industry. The income approach consists of discounting projected future cash flows, which are derived from internal forecasts and economic expectations for the reporting unit. The significant
inputs and assumptions for the income approach include projected earnings of the Company in future years for which there is inherent uncertainty and the discount rate. The sensitivity of a range of reasonable discount rates based on the current
economic environment is considered.
Our quantitative annual impairment tests as of September 30, 2024 and
2023 did not result in impairment. However, changing economic conditions that may adversely affect the Company’s performance, the fair value of its assets
and liabilities, or its stock price could result in future impairment. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Management will continue to monitor events
that could influence this conclusion in the future.
Goodwill recorded for the merger with CFBanc Corporation during the second quarter of 2021 was $25.9 million.
Core deposit intangible assets arising from mergers and acquisitions are amortized on an accelerated basis reflecting the pattern in which the
economic benefits of the intangible asset are consumed or otherwise used up. The estimated life of the core deposit intangible is approximately 10
years.
Office Properties and Equipment
Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Buildings and related components are depreciated using the
straight‑line method with useful lives ranging from 10 to 40 years. Furniture, fixtures, and equipment are depreciated using the straight‑line method with useful lives ranging from 3 to 10 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lease term or
the estimated useful life of the asset, whichever is shorter.
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) stock
The Bank is a member of the FHLB and FRB systems. Members are required to own a certain amount of stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors, and may
invest in additional amounts. FHLB and FRB stock are carried at cost, classified as restricted securities, and periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery of their par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as
income when declared.
Bank‑Owned Life Insurance
The Bank has purchased life insurance policies on a former key executive. Bank owned life insurance is recorded at the amount that can be realized under the
insurance contract at the balance sheet date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other amounts due that are probable at settlement.
Investment in Affordable Housing Limited Partnership
The Bank owns a less than 5% interest in an
affordable housing limited partnership. The investment is recorded using the cost method and is being amortized over the life of the related tax credits. The tax credits are being recognized in income tax expense in the consolidated financial
statements to the extent they are utilized on the Company’s income tax returns. The investment is reviewed for impairment on an annual basis or on an interim basis if an event occurs that would trigger potential impairment.
Loan Commitments and Related Financial Instruments
Financial instruments include off‑balance sheet credit instruments, such as commitments to make loans and commercial letters of credit, issued to meet customer
financing needs. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded.
Variable Interest Entities (“VIE”)
An entity is considered to be a VIE when it
does not have sufficient equity investment at risk, the equity investors as a group lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest, or the entity is structured with disproportionate voting rights and substantially all of the
entity’s activities are conducted on behalf of an investor with disproportionately few voting rights. The Company is required to consolidate a VIE when it holds a variable interest in the VIE and is also the primary beneficiary of the VIE. CFC
45 is a Community Development Entity (“CDE”), and is considered to be a VIE.
Noncontrolling Interests
For consolidated subsidiaries that are less than wholly-owned, the third-party holdings of equity interests
are referred to as noncontrolling interests. The portion of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for such subsidiaries is presented as net income applicable to noncontrolling interests on the consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income, and the portion of the stockholders’ equity of such subsidiaries is presented as noncontrolling interests on the consolidated statements of financial condition and consolidated statements of changes in
stockholders’ equity.
Revenue Recognition
ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC
606”) establishes principles for reporting information about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from the entity’s contracts to provide goods or services to customers. The core principle of this standard
requires the Company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that it expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods or services recognized as
performance obligations are satisfied. Most of our revenue‑generating transactions are not subject to ASC 606, including revenue generated from financial instruments, such as our loans and investment securities, as these activities are subject
to other GAAP discussed elsewhere within our disclosures. The Company’s revenue stream that is within the scope of Topic 606 is primarily service charges on deposit accounts, which consist of monthly service fees, check orders, and other
deposit account related fees. The Company’s performance obligation for monthly service fees is generally satisfied, and the related revenue recognized, over the period in which the service is provided. Check orders and other deposit account
related fees are largely transaction based, and therefore, the Company’s performance obligation is satisfied, and related revenue recognized, at a point in time. Payment for service charges on deposit accounts is primarily received immediately
or in the following month through a direct charge to customers’ accounts.
Stock‑Based Compensation
Compensation cost is recognized for stock options and restricted stock awards issued to employees and directors, based on the fair value of these awards at the date
of grant. A Black‑Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options, while the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant is used for restricted stock awards.
Compensation cost is recognized over the required service period, generally defined as the vesting period. Compensation cost is recognized on a straight‑line basis
over the requisite service period for the entire award. The Company’s accounting policy is to recognize forfeitures as they occur.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the
amount expected to be realized.
A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination
being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded.
The Company recognizes interest related to income tax matters in interest expense and penalties related to tax matters in income tax expense.
Retirement Plans
Employee 401(k) expense is the amount of matching contributions made by the Company.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)
The cost of shares issued to the ESOP, but not yet allocated to participants, is shown as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. Compensation expense is based on the
market price of shares as they are committed to be released to participant accounts. Dividends on allocated ESOP shares reduce retained earnings; dividends on unearned ESOP shares reduce debt and accrued interest.
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per share of common stock is computed pursuant to the two‑class method by dividing net income available to common stockholders less
dividends paid on participating securities (unvested shares of restricted common stock) and any undistributed earnings attributable to participating securities by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. The weighted
average common shares outstanding includes the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding less the weighted average number of unvested shares of restricted common stock. ESOP shares are considered outstanding for this
calculation unless unearned. Diluted earnings per share of common stock includes the dilutive effect of unvested stock awards. It also includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options using the
treasury method.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income consists of the net income from operations and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains and losses on
securities available‑for‑sale, net of tax, which are also recognized as separate components of equity.
Loss Contingencies
Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is
probable, and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. Management does not believe that any such matters existed as of the balance sheet date that will have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Leases
The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and operating lease liabilities are included in the
Company’s consolidated financial statements. ROU assets represent the Company’s right-of-use of an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments pursuant to the Company’s
leases. The ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement of the lease based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. To determine the present value of lease payments, the Company uses its incremental borrowing
rate. The lease term may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for
the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2: Significant observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not
active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or
liability.
Fair values are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in Note 8 “Fair Value.” Fair value
estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market
conditions could significantly affect the estimates.
Operating Segments
The Company operates one reportable
segment — banking. The Company’s chief executive officer is its chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). The CODM assesses operating performance and manages the allocation of resources primarily based on the Company’s consolidated operating
results and financial condition. The factors considered in making this determination include all of the banking products and services offered by the Company are available in each branch of the Company, management does not allocate resources
based on the performance of different lending or transaction activities, and how information is reviewed by the chief executive officer and other key decision makers. The CODM uses consolidated net income to benchmark the Company against its
competitors and to monitor budget to actual results. As a result, the Company determined that all services offered relate to banking. Loans, investments, and deposits provide the revenues in the banking operation. Interest expense,
provisions for credit losses and payroll provide the significant expenses in the banking operation. See the Company’s operating segment information in the consolidated statements of financial condition and the consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income.
Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted
In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07 – Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures. The
amendments in this ASU improve reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. The new ASU adds required disclosure of significant segments expenses that are
regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) and included within each reported measure of segment profit or loss, as well as the title and position of the CODM and an explanation of how the CODM uses the
reported measure(s) of segment profit or loss in assessing segment performance. The ASU also clarifies that if the CODM uses more than one measure of a segment’s profit or loss in assessing segment performance, an entity may
report one or more of those additional measures of segment profit; however, at least one of the reported segment profit or loss measures should be the measure that is most consistent with the measurement principals used in
measuring the corresponding amounts in the entity’s consolidated financial statements. Finally, the new ASU requires that an entity that has only one reportable segment provide all of the disclosures required by this ASU and all
existing segment disclosures in Topic 280. The provisions of this ASU became effective, on a prospective basis, for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2024. The amendments in this ASU did not affect the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition or consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss; however, the required
disclosures have been added.
Accounting Pronouncements Yet to Be Adopted
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09 – Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. The amendments in
this ASU address investor requests for more transparency about income tax information through improvements to income tax disclosures. The ASU enhances existing requirements that an entity disclose a tabular reconciliation, using
both reporting currency amounts and percentages, of the entity’s reported income tax expense and the amount computed by multiplying income from continuing operations before income taxes by the applicable statutory Federal income tax
rate by including specific categories in the rate reconciliation table and requiring additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold (if the effect of those reconciling items is equal to or greater
than 5% of the amount computed by multiplying pretax income or loss by the applicable statutory income tax rate). The ASU also includes requirements to disclose the amount of income taxes paid (net of refunds received) disaggregated
by Federal, state, and foreign taxes and the amount of income taxes paid (net of refunds received) disaggregated by individual jurisdictions in which income taxes paid are equal to or greater than 5% of total income taxes paid. The
amendments in this ASU are effective, on a prospective basis, for annual periods beginning after December 31, 2024. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in this ASU will not affect the Company’s consolidated statements of
financial condition or consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income; however, the required disclosures will be added to the Company’s consolidated financial statements after the ASU is adopted.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03 – Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. The amendments in this update require companies to disclose, in the notes to financial statements, specified information about certain costs and expenses at
each interim and annual reporting period. The provisions of this ASU become effective for the Company for all annual and interim periods beginning January 1, 2027. The adoption of ASU No. 2024-03 is not expected to have a material
impact on the Company’s financial statements. In January 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-01 – Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive
Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40). The purpose of this update is to clarify and affirm the initial effective date of adoption of ASU 2024-03 to be annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026,
and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027.
On October 31, 2023, the Company effected a reverse stock split of the Company’s outstanding shares of Class A common stock, Class B common stock, and Class C common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at a ratio of 1-for-8
(the “Reverse Stock Split”). The shares of Class A Common Stock listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market commenced trading on The Nasdaq Capital Market on a post-Reverse Stock Split
adjusted basis at the open of business on November 1, 2023. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, the number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split was reduced, such that every eight
shares of common stock held by a stockholder immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split were combined and reclassified into one share of common stock. All common stock share amounts and per share numbers discussed herein have been
adjusted for the Reverse Stock Split.
On October 31, 2023 the Company purchased 244,771
shares of its Class A (voting) Common Stock (adjusted for the 1-for-8 reverse stock split effective November 1, 2023) from the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), which obtained the shares when it was appointed receiver for First Republic Bank upon its closure earlier in 2023. The purchased shares represented just under 4.0% of the Company’s total voting shares prior to the purchase, and over 2.6%
of the Company’s total common equity. The Company purchased the shares at a price of $7.2760 per share (adjusted for the 1-for-8 reverse stock split effective November 1, 2023), which represented the 20-day volume weighted average price for the Class A shares over the period ended October 24, 2023. The purchase was financed from cash on hand and the shares were retired.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company declared and paid ECIP dividends of $1.6 million on its non-cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred stock.
Note 3 – Securities
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of the available‑for‑sale investment securities portfolios at December 31, 2024 and December 31,
2023 and the corresponding amounts of unrealized gains (losses) which are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss:
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
December 31, 2024:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal agency mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
62,853
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
(9,832
|
)
|
|
$
|
53,029
|
|
Federal agency Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMOs)
|
|
|
21,299 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
|
|
20,058 |
|
Federal agency debt
|
|
|
42,100
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2,068
|
)
|
|
|
40,034
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
|
|
4,388
|
|
U. S. Treasuries
|
|
|
77,857
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(667
|
)
|
|
|
77,190
|
|
SBA pools
|
|
|
10,749
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1,588
|
)
|
|
|
9,163
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
219,658
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
(15,814
|
)
|
|
$
|
203,862
|
|
December 31, 2023:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal agency mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
76,091
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
(9,316
|
)
|
|
$
|
66,778
|
|
Federal agency CMOs
|
|
|
24,720
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1,381
|
)
|
|
|
23,339
|
|
Federal agency debt
|
|
|
50,893
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(3,057
|
)
|
|
|
47,836
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
4,833
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(460
|
)
|
|
|
4,373
|
|
U. S. Treasuries
|
|
|
167,055
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(3,175
|
)
|
|
|
163,880
|
|
SBA pools
|
|
|
12,386
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1,646
|
)
|
|
|
10,744
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
335,978
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
(19,035
|
)
|
|
$
|
316,950
|
|
There were no sales of securities during the
years ended December 31, 2024 or 2023.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of all investment securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2024, by contractual maturities are shown below.
Contractual maturities may differ from expected maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
85,890
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
(932
|
)
|
|
$
|
84,958
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
37,790
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2,248
|
)
|
|
|
35,544
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
21,691
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
20,704
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
74,287
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(11,634
|
)
|
|
|
62,656
|
|
|
|
$
|
219,658
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
(15,814
|
)
|
|
$
|
203,862
|
|
The table below indicates the length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
December 31, 2024:
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Federal agency mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
52,568
|
|
|
$
|
(9,832
|
)
|
|
$
|
52,568
|
|
|
$
|
(9,832
|
)
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
19,303 |
|
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
|
|
19,303 |
|
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
Federal agency debt
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
37,508
|
|
|
|
(2,068
|
)
|
|
|
37,508
|
|
|
|
(2,068
|
)
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
4,388
|
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
|
|
4,388
|
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
U. S. Treasuries
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
77,190
|
|
|
|
(667
|
)
|
|
|
77,190
|
|
|
|
(667
|
)
|
SBA pools
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
8,179
|
|
|
|
(1,587
|
)
|
|
|
8,808
|
|
|
|
(1,588
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
629
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
199,136
|
|
|
$
|
(15,813
|
)
|
|
$
|
199,765
|
|
|
$
|
(15,814
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2023:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal agency mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
66,575
|
|
|
$
|
(9,316
|
)
|
|
$
|
66,575
|
|
|
$
|
(9,316
|
)
|
Federal agency CMOs
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
23,339 |
|
|
|
(1,381 |
) |
|
|
23,339 |
|
|
|
(1,381 |
) |
Federal agency debt
|
|
|
3,018
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
44,818
|
|
|
|
(3,020
|
)
|
|
|
47,836
|
|
|
|
(3,057
|
)
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
4,373
|
|
|
|
(460
|
)
|
|
|
4,373
|
|
|
|
(460
|
)
|
U. S. Treasuries
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
163,880
|
|
|
|
(3,175
|
)
|
|
|
163,880
|
|
|
|
(3,175
|
)
|
SBA pools
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
9,439 |
|
|
|
(1,645 |
) |
|
|
9,725 |
|
|
|
(1,646 |
) |
Total
|
|
$
|
3,304
|
|
|
$
|
(38
|
)
|
|
$
|
312,424
|
|
|
$
|
(18,997
|
)
|
|
$
|
315,728
|
|
|
$
|
(19,035
|
)
|
Securities with a market value of $83.3 million were pledged as collateral for securities sold under agreements to repurchase as of December 31, 2024 and included $46.5 million of U.S. Treasuries, $27.1
million of federal agency debt, $5.5 million of federal agency mortgage-backed securities, and $4.2 million of SBA pools. Securities with a market value of $89.0 million were pledged as collateral for securities sold under agreements to repurchase as of December 31, 2023 and included $47.8 million of U.S. Treasuries, $30.2 million of
federal agency debt, and $11.0 million of federal agency mortgage-backed securities. Investment securities with a book
value of $107.3 million and a fair value of $98.3 million were pledged as collateral to the Federal Reserve as of December 31, 2023 for borrowings under the Bank Term Funding Program.
At
December 31, 2024 and 2023, there were no securities pledged to secure public deposits since those public deposits are under
$250 thousand which are fully insured by FDIC. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, there were no holdings of securities by any
one issuer, other than the U.S. Government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of stockholders’ equity. Accrued interest receivable on securities was $796 thousand and $1.2 million at December 31, 2024 and
2023, respectively, and is included in the consolidated statements of financial condition in accrued interest receivable.
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, there were no
securities in nonaccrual status. All securities in the portfolio were current with their contractual principal and interest payments. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, there were no securities purchased with deterioration in credit quality since their origination, and there were no collateral dependent securities.
Note 4 – Loans Receivable Held for Investment
Loans receivable held for investment were as follows as of the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family
|
|
$
|
23,566
|
|
|
$
|
24,702
|
|
|
|
|
633,306
|
|
|
|
561,447
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
156,155
|
|
|
|
119,436
|
|
Church
|
|
|
9,470
|
|
|
|
12,717
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
80,948
|
|
|
|
89,887
|
|
Commercial – other
|
|
|
70,596
|
|
|
|
63,450
|
|
SBA loans (1) |
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
14,954 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans receivable before deferred loan costs and premiums
|
|
|
975,196
|
|
|
|
886,606
|
|
Unamortized net deferred loan costs and premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
977,312 |
|
|
|
888,577 |
|
Credit and interest marks on purchased loans, net
|
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
(772 |
) |
Allowance for credit losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company
accounts for credit losses on loans in accordance with ASC 326, which requires the Company to recognize estimates for lifetime losses on loans and off-balance sheet loan commitments at the time of origination or acquisition. The recognition
of losses at origination or acquisition represents the Company’s best estimate of the lifetime expected credit loss associated with a loan given the facts and circumstances associated with the particular loan, and involves the use of
significant management judgment and estimates, which are subject to change based on management’s on-going assessment of the credit quality of the loan portfolio and changes in economic forecasts used in the model. The Company uses the WARM
method when determining estimates for the ACL for each of its portfolio segments. The weighted average remaining life, including the effect of estimated prepayments, is calculated for each loan pool on a quarterly basis. The Company then
estimates a loss rate for each pool using both its own historical loss experience and the historical losses of a group of peer institutions during the period from 2004 through the most recent quarter.
The
Company’s ACL model also includes adjustments for qualitative factors, where appropriate. Qualitative adjustments may include, but are not limited to factors such as: (i) changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in
underwriting standards and collections, charge offs, and recovery practices; (ii) changes in international, national, regional, and local conditions; (iii) changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio and terms of loans; (iv) changes
in the experience, depth, and ability of lending management; (v) changes in the volume and severity of past due loans and other similar conditions; (vi) changes in the quality of the organization’s loan review system; (vii) changes in the
value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans; (viii) the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the levels of such concentrations; and (ix) the effect of other external factors (i.e.,
competition, legal and regulatory requirements) on the level of estimated credit losses. These qualitative factors incorporate the concept of reasonable and supportable forecasts, as required by ASC 326.
The following tables summarize the activity in the allowance for credit losses on loans for the periods indicated:
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2024
|
|
|
Beginning
Balance
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
Provision
(Recapture)
|
|
Ending
Balance
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Loans receivable held for investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family
|
|
$
|
260
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
4,413
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
4,568
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
Church
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
Commercial - other
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
SBA loans
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,348
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
755
|
|
|
$
|
8,103
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
|
|
|
Beginning
Balance
|
|
|
Impact of CECL
Adoption
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
Provision
(Recapture)
|
|
Ending
Balance
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Loans receivable held for investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
(63
|
)
|
|
$
|
260
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
3,273
|
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
4,413
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
Church
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
72
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
Commercial - other
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
SBA loans
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,388
|
|
|
$ |
1,809 |
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
|
$
|
935
|
|
|
$
|
7,348
|
|
The
Company also recorded a recovery of provision for off-balance sheet loan commitments of $91 thousand and $2 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
The ACL increased to $8.1 million as of December 31, 2024, compared to $7.3 million as of December 31, 2023, primarily due to growth in the loan portfolio.
The Company evaluates loans collectively for purposes of determining the ACL in accordance with ASC 326. Collective evaluation is based on aggregating loans deemed to possess similar risk
characteristics. In certain instances, the Company may identify loans that it believes no longer possess risk characteristics similar to other loans in the loan portfolio. These loans are typically identified from those that have exhibited
deterioration in credit quality, since the specific attributes and risks associated with such loans tend to become unique as the credit deteriorates. Such loans are typically nonperforming, downgraded to substandard or worse, and/or are deemed
collateral dependent, where the ultimate repayment of the loan is expected to come from the operation of or eventual sale of the collateral. Loans that are deemed by management to no longer possess risk characteristics similar to other loans in
the portfolio, or that have been identified as collateral dependent, are evaluated individually for purposes of determining an appropriate lifetime ACL. The Company uses the remaining life approach, using the loan’s effective interest rate, for
determining the ACL on individually evaluated loans, unless the loan is deemed collateral dependent, which requires evaluation based on the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, less estimated selling costs. The Company may
increase or decrease the ACL for collateral dependent loans based on changes in the estimated fair value of the collateral.
The following tables present collateral dependent loans by collateral type as of the date indicated:
|
|
December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
Single-Family
|
|
|
Multi-Family
Residential
|
|
|
Church
|
|
|
Business
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Single-family
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Church
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
SBA loans
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2023
|
|
|
|
Single-Family
|
|
|
Multi-Family
Residential
|
|
|
Church
|
|
|
Business
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Single-family
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
5,672 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
5,672 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Church
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
Commercial – other
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
5,672
|
|
|
$
|
456
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
$
|
6,441
|
|
At December 31, 2024, one $264 thousand individually
evaluated loan was evaluated based on the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral. This loan had no associated ACL
as of December 31, 2024 and was on nonaccrual status.
At December 31, 2023, $6.4 million of individually evaluated loans were evaluated based on the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral. These loans had an
associated ACL of $112 thousand as of December 31, 2023. None of these collateral dependent loans were on nonaccrual status at December 31, 2023. At December 31, 2023, no individually evaluated loans were evaluated using a discounted future cash flow approach.
Past Due Loans
The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans by loan type as of the periods indicated:
|
|
December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than
90 Days
Past Due
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable held for investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
23,572
|
|
|
$
|
23,578
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
636,259
|
|
|
|
636,259
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
156,076
|
|
|
|
156,076
|
|
Church
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
9,475
|
|
|
|
9,475
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
80,488
|
|
|
|
80,488
|
|
Commercial - other
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
70,281
|
|
|
|
70,281
|
|
SBA loans
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than
90 Days
Past Due
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable held for investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
24,702
|
|
|
$
|
24,702
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
563,017
|
|
|
|
563,418
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
119,436
|
|
|
|
119,436
|
|
Church
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
12,717
|
|
|
|
12,717
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
89,887
|
|
|
|
89,887
|
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
63,450
|
|
|
|
63,450
|
|
SBA loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The following table presents the recorded investment in non‑accrual loans by loan type as of the period indicated:
December 31, 2024
|
|
Nonaccrual
with no
Allowance for
Credit Losses
|
|
Nonaccrual
with an
Allowance
for Credit
Losses
|
|
|
Total
Nonaccrual
Loans
|
|
Loans receivable held for investment:
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBA loans
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
Total non-accrual loans
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
There were no non-accrual loans as of December 31, 2023.
There were no loans 90 days or more delinquent
that were accruing interest as of December 31, 2024 or December 31, 2023. None of the non-accrual loans were delinquent.
Modified Loans to Troubled Borrowers
GAAP requires that certain types of
modifications of loans in response to a borrower’s financial difficulty be reported, which consist of the following: (i) principal forgiveness, (ii) interest rate reduction, (iii) other-than-insignificant payment delay, (iv) term extension, or
(v) any combination of the foregoing. The ACL for loans that were modified in response to a borrower’s financial difficulty is measured on a collective basis, as with other loans in the loan portfolio, unless management determines that such
loans no longer possess risk characteristics similar to others in the loan portfolio. In those instances, the ACL for such loans is determined through individual evaluation.
The following table presents the amortized costs basis as of December 31, 2024 and the financial effect of loans modified to borrowers experiencing financial
difficulty during the year ended December 31, 2024. There were no loan modifications to borrowers that were experiencing financial difficulty during the year
ended December 31, 2023.
|
December 31, 2024
|
|
Term Extension
|
|
Percentage
of Total
Loan Type
|
|
Weighted
Average
Term
Extension
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
792
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
%
|
12 months
|
Construction
|
|
|
4,559
|
|
|
|
5.66
|
%
|
17 months
|
Commercial - other
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
1.28
|
%
|
14 months
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
Quality Indicators
The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial
information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. For single-family residential, consumer and other smaller balance homogenous loans, a credit grade is
established at inception, and generally only adjusted based on performance. Information about payment status is disclosed elsewhere herein. The Company analyzes all other loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This
analysis is performed at least on an annual basis. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:
|
● |
Watch. Loans classified as watch exhibit weaknesses that could threaten the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligors. Watch graded loans are generally performing
and are not more than 59 days past due. A watch rating is used when a material deficiency exists, but correction is anticipated within an acceptable time frame.
|
|
● |
Special Mention. Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention that appears short-term in nature. If left
uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.
|
|
● |
Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans
so classified have a well‑defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardizes the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution may sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
|
|
● |
Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection
or liquidation in full, based on currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.
|
|
● |
Loss. Loans classified as loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that to continue to carry the loan as an active asset is no longer warranted.
|
Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above-described process are considered to be pass rated loans. Pass rated loans
are generally well protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor and/or by the value of the underlying collateral. Pass rated loans are not more than 59 days past due and are generally performing in accordance with the
loan terms.
The following table stratifies the loans held for investment portfolio by the Company’s internal risk grading, and by year of origination as
of the date indicated:
|
|
Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year - As of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
Prior
|
|
|
Revolving
Loans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Single-family:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
$
|
4,051
|
|
|
$
|
1,809
|
|
|
$
|
1,664
|
|
|
$
|
13,597
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
21,664
|
|
Watch
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
1,185
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,914
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
$
|
4,051
|
|
|
$
|
2,538
|
|
|
$
|
2,849
|
|
|
$
|
13,597
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
23,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
81,474
|
|
|
$
|
77,739
|
|
|
$
|
171,836
|
|
|
$
|
126,386
|
|
|
$
|
26,771
|
|
|
$
|
89,581
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
573,787
|
|
Watch
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
5,633
|
|
|
|
15,731
|
|
|
|
14,761
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
10,480
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
46,605
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3,227
|
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
6,377
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
4,457
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3,587
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
9,490
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
81,474
|
|
|
$
|
84,818
|
|
|
$
|
190,794
|
|
|
$
|
148,754
|
|
|
$
|
26,771
|
|
|
$
|
103,648
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
636,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
49,143
|
|
|
$
|
9,655
|
|
|
$
|
20,841
|
|
|
$
|
28,653
|
|
|
$
|
21,150
|
|
|
$
|
19,561
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
149,003
|
|
Watch
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
792
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3,802
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3,271
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
3,271
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
49,143
|
|
|
$
|
14,510
|
|
|
$
|
21,273
|
|
|
$
|
29,647
|
|
|
$
|
21,150
|
|
|
$
|
20,353
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
156,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Church:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
2,442
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
2,148
|
|
|
$
|
1,696
|
|
|
$
|
1,002
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
7,288
|
|
Watch
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
994
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
2,818
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
2,148
|
|
|
$
|
1,696
|
|
|
$
|
2,813
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
9,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Watch
|
|
$ |
8,876
|
|
|
$
|
29,390
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
2,038
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
40,531
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
4,076
|
|
|
|
31,823
|
|
|
|
4,058
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
39,957
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,876
|
|
|
$
|
33,466
|
|
|
$
|
32,050
|
|
|
$
|
4,058
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
2,038
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
80,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial – other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
7,575
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
2,768
|
|
|
$
|
4,590
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
14,937
|
|
Watch
|
|
|
17,444
|
|
|
|
28,157
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
47,504
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2,601
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
4,562
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
5,239
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
17,445
|
|
|
$
|
28,160
|
|
|
$
|
8,632
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
3,339
|
|
|
$
|
12,599
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
70,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
590
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
654
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
590
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
1,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
131,221
|
|
|
$
|
90,382
|
|
|
$
|
204,303
|
|
|
$
|
158,996
|
|
|
$
|
54,049
|
|
|
$
|
128,395
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
767,346
|
|
Watch
|
|
|
26,320
|
|
|
|
65,140
|
|
|
|
17,096
|
|
|
|
16,484
|
|
|
|
1,185
|
|
|
|
15,125
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
141,350
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3,578
|
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
8,978
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
8,793
|
|
|
|
31,973
|
|
|
|
8,621
|
|
|
|
909
|
|
|
|
9,342
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
59,638
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
157,541
|
|
|
$
|
164,315
|
|
|
$
|
256,950
|
|
|
$
|
187,251
|
|
|
$
|
56,143
|
|
|
$
|
155,112
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
977,312
|
|
|
|
Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year - As of December 31, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
Prior
|
|
|
Revolving
Loans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Single-family:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
2,474
|
|
|
$
|
1,862
|
|
|
$
|
2,940
|
|
|
$
|
1,485
|
|
|
$
|
12,374
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
21,135
|
|
Watch
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,749
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,702
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
2,474
|
|
|
$
|
2,612
|
|
|
$
|
4,305
|
|
|
$
|
1,485
|
|
|
$
|
13,826
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
24,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
81,927
|
|
|
$
|
183,295
|
|
|
$
|
145,652
|
|
|
$
|
27,356
|
|
|
$
|
44,511
|
|
|
$
|
47,119
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
529,860
|
|
Watch
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
4,686
|
|
|
|
6,203
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,186
|
|
|
|
6,474
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
18,549
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2,243
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
12,403
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
12,766
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
81,927
|
|
|
$
|
187,981
|
|
|
$
|
152,754
|
|
|
$
|
27,356
|
|
|
$
|
46,060
|
|
|
$
|
67,340
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
563,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
9,881
|
|
|
$
|
22,131
|
|
|
$
|
26,019
|
|
|
$
|
24,684
|
|
|
$
|
6,718
|
|
|
$
|
15,106
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
104,539
|
|
Watch
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
5,286
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2,599
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
8,327
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
6,245
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
6,245
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
9,881
|
|
|
$
|
22,573
|
|
|
$
|
26,019
|
|
|
$
|
29,970
|
|
|
$
|
7,043
|
|
|
$
|
23,950
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
119,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Church:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
2,923
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
2,210
|
|
|
$
|
1,748
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
2,704
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
9,585
|
|
Watch
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2,161
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
971
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
971
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,923
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
2,210
|
|
|
$
|
1,748
|
|
|
$
|
636
|
|
|
$
|
5,200
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
12,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
1,109
|
|
|
$
|
1,198
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
2,307
|
|
Watch
|
|
|
42,300
|
|
|
|
35,179
|
|
|
|
5,484
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
85,060
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
42,300
|
|
|
$
|
36,288
|
|
|
$
|
9,202
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
2,097
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
89,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial – other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,077
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
5,600
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
25,154
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
54,918
|
|
Watch
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
6,550
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
8,362
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,389
|
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
7,100
|
|
|
$
|
6,550
|
|
|
$
|
25,154
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
63,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
11,809
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
2,453
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
14,487
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,809
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
2,453
|
|
|
$
|
467
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
14,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
121,553
|
|
|
$
|
218,195
|
|
|
$
|
179,481
|
|
|
$
|
62,328
|
|
|
$
|
52,730
|
|
|
$
|
102,557
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
736,844
|
|
Watch
|
|
|
42,300
|
|
|
|
40,619
|
|
|
|
12,437
|
|
|
|
6,786
|
|
|
|
8,372
|
|
|
|
13,694
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
124,208
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3,589
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
5,841
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
19,956
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
21,684
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
163,853
|
|
|
$
|
258,814
|
|
|
$
|
195,507
|
|
|
$
|
70,946
|
|
|
$
|
61,790
|
|
|
$
|
137,667
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
888,577
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses for Off-Balance Sheet Commitments
The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet commitments related to
unfunded loans and lines of credit, which is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities of the consolidated statements of financial condition. The Company applies an expected credit loss estimation methodology for off-balance sheet
commitments. This methodology is commensurate with the methodology applied to each respective segment of the loan portfolio in determining the ACL for loans held-for-investment. The loss estimation process includes assumptions for the
probability that a loan will fund, as well as the expected amount of funding. These assumptions are based on the Company’s own historical internal loan data.
The allowance for off-balance sheet commitments was $277 thousand and $364 thousand at December 31, 2024 and
2023, respectively. The recovery of credit losses for off-balance sheet commitments was $91 thousand and $2 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Note 5 – Office Properties and Equipment, net
Year‑end office properties and equipment were as follows:
|
|
December 31,
2024
|
|
|
December 31,
2023
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
5,322
|
|
|
$
|
5,322
|
|
Office buildings and improvements
|
|
|
7,649
|
|
|
|
6,433
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
|
|
|
1,214
|
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
|
14,185
|
|
|
|
14,073
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(5,286
|
)
|
|
|
(4,888
|
)
|
Office properties and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
8,899
|
|
|
$
|
9,185
|
|
Depreciation expense was $424 thousand and $385 thousand for the years 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Note 6 – Leases
Effective October 1, 2021, the Bank entered into an operating lease for its administrative offices at 4601 Wilshire Boulevard in Los Angeles.
The ROU asset represents our right to use the underlying asset during the lease
term. Operating lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and lease
liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the remaining lease payments using a discount rate that represents our incremental borrowing rate at the date of implementation of the new accounting standard. The ROU asset totaled $420 thousand and $655 thousand as of
December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and was included in other assets on the consolidated statements of financial condition.
The lease liability totaled $420 thousand and $655 thousand as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and was included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition.
The operating lease has one 5-year extension option at the then fair market rate. As
this extension option is not reasonably certain of exercise, it is not included in the lease term. The Bank has no finance leases.
The Company recognized rent expense of $242
thousand in 2024 and $305 thousand in 2023.
Additional information regarding our operating leases is summarized below for
the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2024
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2023
|
|
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of
lease liabilities for operating leases
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
– |
|
Weighted average remaining lease term in months
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Weighted average discount rate
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
The future minimum payments for operating leases with remaining terms of one
year or more as of December 31, 2024 were as follows (in thousands):
Year ended December 31, 2025
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2026
|
|
|
182
|
|
Total future minimum lease payments
|
|
|
424
|
|
Amounts representing interest
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Present value of net future minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
420
|
|
Note 7 – Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible
The following table presents the changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill and core deposit intangibles for the years ended December
31, 2024 and 2023:
|
|
December 31, 2024 |
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Core Deposit
Intangible
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance at the beginning of the period
|
|
$
|
25,858
|
|
|
$
|
2,111
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
Balance at the end of the period
|
|
$
|
25,858
|
|
|
$
|
1,775
|
|
|
December 31, 2023 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Core Deposit
Intangible
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance at the beginning of the period
|
|
$
|
25,858
|
|
|
$
|
2,501
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
Balance at the end of the period
|
|
$
|
25,858
|
|
|
$
|
2,111
|
|
No impairment charges were recorded during 2024 or 2023 for goodwill. Management’s assessment of goodwill is performed in accordance with ASC 350-20
– Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, which allows the Company to perform a qualitative assessment of goodwill to determine if it is more likely than not the fair value of the Company’s equity is below its carrying value. The Company performed its
qualitative and quantitative assessment as of September 30, 2024 due to concerns regarding declines in the Company’s stock price. No impairment charges were necessary as a result of the qualitative and quantitative assessments.
The carrying value and accumulated amortization related to the Company’s core deposit intangible consisted of the following at December 31, 2024 and 2023:
|
|
December 31,
2024
|
|
|
December 31,
2023
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible acquired
|
|
$
|
3,329
|
|
|
$
|
3,329 |
|
Less: accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(1,554
|
)
|
|
|
(1,218
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
1,775
|
|
|
$
|
2,111 |
|
The following table outlines the estimated amortization expense
related to the core deposit intangible during the next five fiscal years:
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
2026
|
|
|
304
|
|
2027
|
|
|
291
|
|
2028
|
|
|
279
|
|
2029
|
|
|
267
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,775
|
|
Note 8 – Fair Value
The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value:
The fair values of securities available‑for‑sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix
pricing, which is a mathematical technique to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2
inputs).
The fair value of loans that are collateral dependent is generally based upon the fair value of the collateral, which is obtained from recent real estate appraisals.
These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for
differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. Collateral dependent loans are evaluated on a
quarterly basis for additional required calculation adjustments (taken as part of the ACL) and adjusted accordingly.
Appraisals for collateral-dependent loans and assets acquired through or by transfer of in lieu of foreclosure are performed by certified general appraisers (for
commercial properties) or certified residential appraisers (for residential properties) whose qualifications and licenses have been reviewed and verified by the Company. Once received, an independent third‑party licensed appraiser reviews the
appraisals for accuracy and reasonableness, reviewing the assumptions and approaches utilized in the appraisal as well as the overall resulting fair value in comparison with independent data sources such as recent market data or industry-wide
statistics.
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
At December 31, 2024:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal agency mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$
|
53,029
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
53,029
|
|
Federal agency CMOs
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
20,058 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
20,058 |
|
Federal agency debt
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
40,034 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
40,034 |
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
4,388
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
4,388
|
|
U.S. Treasuries
|
|
|
77,190
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
77,190
|
|
SBA pools
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
9,163 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
9,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2023:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal agency mortgage-backed
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$
|
66,778
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
66,778
|
|
Federal agency CMO
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
23,339 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
23,339 |
|
Federal agency debt
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
47,836
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
47,836
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
4,373 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
4,373 |
|
U.S. Treasuries
|
|
|
163,880 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
163,880 |
|
SBA pools
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
10,744 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
10,744 |
|
There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 during the years ended December 31, 2024 or 2023.
Assets Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis
There were no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2024 or 2023.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments as of the periods indicated were as follows:
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
61,365
|
|
|
$
|
61,365
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
61,365
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
203,862
|
|
|
|
77,190
|
|
|
|
126,672
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
203,862
|
|
Loans receivable held for investment
|
|
|
968,861
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
942,920
|
|
|
|
942,920
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
5,001
|
|
|
|
5,001
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
5,001
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
3,321
|
|
|
|
3,321
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3,321
|
|
Financial Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
745,399
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
669,695
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
669,695
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
195,532
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
195,794
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
195,794
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
66,610
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
66,070
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
66,070
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
105,195
|
|
|
$
|
105,195
|
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$
|
105,195
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
316,950
|
|
|
|
163,880
|
|
|
|
153,070
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
316,950
|
|
Loans receivable held for investment
|
|
|
880,457 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
746,539 |
|
|
|
746,539 |
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
4,938
|
|
|
|
4,938
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
4,938
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
3,275
|
|
|
|
3,275
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3,275
|
|
Financial Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
682,635
|
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$
|
536,171
|
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$
|
536,171
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
209,319
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
208,107
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
208,107
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
73,475
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
72,597 |
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
72,597
|
|
Bank Term Funding Program borrowing
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Note payable
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
Note 9 – Deposits
Deposits are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Interest checking and other demand deposits
|
|
$
|
251,538
|
|
|
$
|
219,138
|
|
Non‑interest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
105,227
|
|
|
|
107,891
|
|
Money market deposits
|
|
|
125,862
|
|
|
|
127,590
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
49,933
|
|
|
|
59,981
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank accepts two types of deposits from a deposit placement service called the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”). Reciprocal deposits are
the Bank’s own retail deposits in amounts in excess of the insured limits. The CDARS program allows banks to place their customers’ funds in FDIC‑insured certificates of deposit at other banks and, at the same time, receive an equal sum of funds
from the customers of other banks in the CDARS Network. These deposits totaled $145.8 million and $114.8 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively and are not considered to be brokered deposits. The other type of deposit that may be
accepted under the CDARS program is nonreciprocal deposits which are considered to be brokered funds. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Bank had no
such deposits.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, approximately $268.8
million and $286.4 million of our total deposits (including deposits from affiliates) were not insured by FDIC insurance, which
represented 32% and 37%
of total deposits, respectively.
Scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit for the next five years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2025
|
|
$
|
201,342
|
|
2026
|
|
|
8,772
|
|
2027
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
2028
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
2029
|
|
|
47
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit of $250 thousand or more totaled $33.2
million and $23.5 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
The Company has a significant concentration of deposits with five long‑time customers that accounted for approximately 18% and 28% of its deposits as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Company expects to maintain the relationships with the customers for the
near term.
Deposits from principal officers, directors, and their affiliates totaled $24.2 million and $21.3 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Note 10 – Borrowings
The following table summarizes information relating to FHLB advances at or for the periods indicated:
|
At or For the Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2024
|
|
2023
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
FHLB Advances:
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance outstanding during the year
|
|
$
|
199,893
|
|
|
$
|
177,261
|
|
Maximum amount outstanding at any month‑end during the year
|
|
$
|
209,298
|
|
|
$
|
210,242
|
|
Balance outstanding at end of year
|
|
$
|
195,532
|
|
|
$
|
209,319
|
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of year
|
|
|
4.03
|
%
|
|
|
4.91
|
%
|
Average cost of advances during the year
|
|
|
4.79
|
%
|
|
|
4.70
|
%
|
Weighted average maturity (in months)
|
|
|
–
|
(1)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(1)
|
The majority of FHLB advances are overnight borrowings
|
Each advance is
subject to a prepayment penalty if paid before its maturity date. The advances were collateralized by $521.7 million and $435.4 million of commercial real estate loans at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, under a blanket lien arrangement. Based on collateral
pledged and the Company’s holdings of FHLB stock as of December 31, 2024, the Company was eligible to borrow up to an additional $174.3
million at year‑end 2024.
Scheduled maturities of FHLB advances are as follows:
|
Amount
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2025
|
|
$
|
195,532
|
|
2026
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
$
|
195,532
|
|
On December 27,
2023, the Company borrowed $100.0 million from the Federal Reserve under the Bank Term Funding Program (“BTFP”). This borrowing was
paid off in December 2024. The interest rate on this borrowing was fixed at 4.84% and the borrowing matured on December 29, 2024. Investment securities with a book value of $107.3 million and a fair value of $98.3 million were pledged as collateral for this borrowing as
of December 31, 2023.
In addition, the
Bank had additional lines of credit of $10.0 million with other financial institutions as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. No amounts were drawn on the lines of credit at December 31, 2024 or 2023.
Note 11 – Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
The Bank enters into agreements under which it sells securities subject to an obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities. Under these
arrangements, the Bank may transfer legal control over the assets but still retain effective control through an agreement that both entitles and obligates the Bank to repurchase the assets. As a result, these repurchase agreements are accounted
for as collateralized financing agreements (i.e., secured borrowings) and not as a sale and subsequent repurchase of securities. The obligation to repurchase the securities is reflected as a liability in the Bank’s consolidated statements of
financial condition, while the securities underlying the repurchase agreements remain in the respective investment securities asset accounts. In other words, there is no offsetting or netting of the investment securities assets with the
repurchase agreement liabilities. As of December 31, 2024, securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaled $66.6 million at an
average rate of 3.62%. These agreements mature on a daily basis, but management expects the agreements to be available in the
foreseeable future. The fair value of securities pledged totaled $83.3 million as of December 31, 2024 and included $46.5 million of U.S. Treasuries, $27.1
million of federal agency debt, $5.5 million of federal agency mortgage-backed securities, and $4.2 million of SBA pools. As of December 31, 2023, securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaled $73.5 million at an average rate of 2.60%. The fair value of
securities pledged totaled $89.0 million as of December 31, 2023 and included $47.8 million of U.S. Treasuries, $30.2 million of federal agency debt, and $11.0 million of federal agency mortgage-backed securities.
Note 12 – Notes Payable
In
connection with the New Market Tax Credit activities of City First Bank, CFC 45 is a partnership whose members include CFNMA and City First New Markets Fund II, LLC. This CDE acts in effect as a pass-through for a Merrill Lynch allocation
totaling $14.0 million that needed to be deployed. In December 2015, Merrill Lynch made a $14.0 million non-recourse loan to CFC 45, whereby CFC 45 passed that loan through to a Qualified Active Low-Income Community Business. The loan to the QALICB was secured by
a Leasehold Deed of Trust that, due to the pass-through, non-recourse structure, was operationally and ultimately for the benefit of Merrill Lynch rather than CFC 45. Debt service payments received by CFC 45 from the QALICB were passed through
to Merrill Lynch in return for which CFC 45 received a servicing fee. The financial statements of CFC 45 are consolidated with those of the Bank and the Company.
There were two notes outstanding at CFC 45 as of December 31, 2023. Note A was in the amount of $9.9 million with a fixed interest rate of 5.2%
per annum. Note B was in the amount of $4.1 million with a fixed interest rate of 0.24% per annum. Quarterly interest only payments commenced in March 2016 and continued through March 2023 for Notes A and B. Beginning in September 2023, quarterly principal
and interest payments were due for Notes A and B. Both notes would have matured on December 1, 2040, but were paid off during
January 2024.
Note 13 – Employee Benefit Plans
401(k) Plans
In July of 2022, the Broadway Federal Bank 401(k) benefit plan and the City First Bank 401(k) benefit plan were combined into one plan called “the City First
Bank 401(k) benefit plan” (the “401(k) Plan”). The 401(k) Plan allows employee contributions for substantially all employees up to 15%
of their compensation, which are matched at a rate equal to 50% of the first 6% of compensation contributed. In addition, the 401(k) Plan makes a non-elective safe harbor contribution of 3% of each eligible employee’s compensation. Expenses related to the 401(k) plans totaled $476
thousand in 2024 and $447 thousand in 2023.
ESOP Plan
Employees participate in an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) after attaining certain age and service
requirements. During 2022, the ESOP purchased 58,369 shares of the Company’s common stock at an average cost of $8.57 per share for a total cost of $500
thousand which was funded with a $5 million line of credit from the Company. During 2023, the ESOP purchased 369,953 additional shares of the Company’s common stock at an average cost of $9.19 per share for a total cost of $3.4 million which was funded with the
line of credit. Any loans or borrowings under the line of credit will be repaid from the Bank’s discretionary contributions to the ESOP, net of dividends paid, over a period of 20 years. Shares of the Company’s common stock purchased by the ESOP are held in a suspense account until released for allocation to participants. When loan payments are made, shares are
allocated to each eligible participant based on the ratio of each such participant’s compensation, as defined in the ESOP, to the total compensation of all eligible plan participants. As the unearned shares are released from the suspense
account, the Company recognizes compensation expense equal to the fair value of the ESOP shares during the periods in which they become committed to be released. To the extent that the fair value of the ESOP shares released differs from the
cost of such shares, the difference is charged or credited to equity as additional paid‑in capital. Dividends on allocated shares increase participant accounts. Dividends on unallocated shares will be used to repay the loan. At the end of
employment, participants will receive shares for their vested balance. Compensation expense related to the ESOP was $202 thousand for
2024 and $307 thousand for 2023.
Shares held by the ESOP were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Allocated to participants
|
|
|
127,804
|
|
|
|
134,444
|
|
Committed to be released
|
|
|
30,036
|
|
|
|
28,669
|
|
Suspense shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ESOP shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of unearned shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2024 and 2023, 30,036 and 28,669 of ESOP shares were released for allocation to participants, respectively. The outstanding book balance of unearned ESOP shares at December 31,
2024 and 2023 was $4.2 million and $4.5
million, respectively, which is shown as unearned ESOP shares in the equity section of the consolidated statements of financial condition.
During December 2022, the Company issued a $5 million line of credit to the ESOP Plan
for the purchase of additional shares. As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the trustee for the ESOP had purchased 428,327 shares at a total cost of $3.9 million.
All common stock share amounts and per share amounts above have been retroactively adjusted, as applicable, for the
1-for-8 reverse stock split effective November 1, 2023. See Note 2.
Note 14 – Income Taxes
The Company and its subsidiary are subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes. Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable
and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Income tax expense (benefit) was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
State
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
398
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rates differ from the federal statutory rate of 21%
applied to income before income taxes due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Federal statutory rate times pre-tax net income
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|
$
|
1,370
|
|
Effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
Earnings from bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Low-income housing credits
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
Tax effect of stock-based compensation
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year‑end deferred tax assets and liabilities were due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses
|
|
$
|
2,331
|
|
|
$
|
2,008
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
State income taxes
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
Net operating loss carryforward
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
1,982
|
|
Partnership investment
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
General business credit
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credit
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Net unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
4,864 |
|
|
|
5,815 |
|
Right of use liability
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
Fair value adjustment on acquired loans
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(449 |
) |
|
|
(449 |
) |
Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
11,642 |
|
|
|
13,106 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 481 adjustments to bad debts
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Deferred loan fees/costs
|
|
|
(1,273
|
)
|
|
|
(1,743
|
)
|
Basis difference on fixed assets
|
|
|
(708
|
)
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
FHLB stock dividends
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right of use assets
|
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(189 |
) |
Core deposit intangibles
|
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
(610 |
) |
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management
evaluated both positive and negative evidence, the amount of taxes paid in available carry‑back years, and the forecasts of future income and tax planning strategies. Based on this analysis, management determined that, as of December 31, 2024, a
valuation allowance of $449 thousand was required on the Company’s deferred tax assets, which totaled $8.8 million (net of valuation allowance). As of December 31, 2023, a valuation allowance of $449 thousand was required on the Company’s deferred tax assets, which totaled $9.5
million (net of valuation allowance).
As of December 31,
2024, the Company had California net operating loss carryforwards of $22.0 million which will begin to expire in 2032 if not
utilized. The Company also had federal general business credits of $1.5 million, which will begin to expire in 2033 if not utilized.
The Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2024 or 2023.
2023 is the most recent tax year for which the Company has filed federal and state income
or franchise tax returns. Federal tax years 2021 through 2023 remain open for the assessment of Federal income tax. California tax years 2020 through 2023 remain open for the assessment of California franchise tax. Washington, D.C. tax years
2021 through 2023 remain open for the assessment of D.C. franchise tax. The Company is not currently under examination by any tax authorities.
Note 15 – Stock‑Based Compensation
Prior to June 21, 2023, the Company issued stock-based
compensation awards to its directors and officers under the 2018 Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) which allowed the grant of non-qualified and incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, full value awards and cash incentive awards.
The maximum number of shares that could be awarded under that plan was 161,639 shares.
On June 21, 2023, stockholders approved the Amended
and Restated 2018 Long Term Incentive Plan (“Amended and Restated LTIP”) which allows the issuance of 487,500 additional
shares and brought the number of shares that may be issued under the Amended and Restated LTIP to 649,139 shares.
The following table summarizes stock option activity during the year ended December 31, 2024:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
31,250
|
|
|
$
|
12.96
|
|
Granted during the year
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Exercised during the year
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Forfeited or expired during the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.96
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was no stock-based compensation expense related to stock options during 2024 or 2023.
Options outstanding and exercisable at year‑end 2024 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
February 24, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
Stock Awards to Directors
In May 2024 and February 2023, the Company awarded 19,832
and 9,230 shares of common stock, respectively, to its directors under the LTIP, which are fully vested. The Company recorded $96 thousand and $95 thousand of
compensation expense in the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively, based on the fair value of the stock on the date of the award.
Restricted Stock
Awards to Employees
In March 2022, the Company issued 61,908 shares of restricted stock to its officers
and employees under the LTIP, of which 21,276 shares have been forfeited as of December 31, 2024. Each restricted stock award
was valued based on the fair value of the stock on the date of the award. These awarded shares of restricted stock fully vest over periods ranging from 36 months to 60 months from their respective dates of grant.
Stock-based compensation is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. During 2024 and 2023, the Company recorded $88
thousand and $106 thousand, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense related to shares awarded to employees.
On June 21, 2023, the Company issued 92,720 shares of restricted stock to its officers and employees under the Amended and Restated LTIP, of which 23,997 shares have been forfeited as of December 31, 2024. Each restricted stock award was valued based on the fair value of the stock on the date
of the award. These awarded shares of restricted stock fully vest over periods ranging from 36 months to 60 months from their respective dates of grant. Stock-based compensation is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. During
the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recorded $113 thousand and $104 thousand, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense related to these restricted stock awards.
On March 26, 2024, and April 5, 2024, the Company
issued 126,083 shares of restricted stock to its officers and employees under the Amended and Restated LTIP, of which 13,015 shares have been forfeited as of December 31, 2024. Each restricted stock award was valued based on the fair value of the stock on the date
of the award. These awarded shares of restricted stock fully vest over periods ranging from 36 months to 60 months from their respective dates of grant. Stock-based compensation is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. During
the year ended December 31, 2024 the Company recorded $108 thousand of stock-based compensation expense related to these restricted
stock awards.
As of December 31, 2024, 307,046 shares had been awarded under the Amended and Restated LTIP and 342,093 shares were available to be awarded.
A summary of restricted stock unit activity for the year ended December 31, 2024 is as follows:
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
|
Remaining
Contractual Life
(months)
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2023
|
|
|
113,568
|
|
|
$
|
9.12
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Granted during period
|
|
|
145,915
|
|
|
|
5.73
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Vested during period
|
|
|
(44,560
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Forfeited or expired during period
|
|
|
(30,049
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2024
|
|
|
184,874
|
|
|
$
|
8.91
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
As of December 31, 2024, there was $1.6 million of total
unrecognized equity-based compensation expense that the Company expects to recognize over the remaining contractual life.
All common stock share amounts above have been
retroactively adjusted, as applicable, for the 1-for-8 reverse stock split effective November 1, 2023. See Note 2.
Note 16 – Regulatory Matters
The Bank’s capital
requirements are administered by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) and involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital
amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the OCC. Failure to meet capital requirements can result in regulatory action.
As a result of the
Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, the federal banking agencies have developed a “Community Bank Leverage Ratio” (“CBLR”) (the ratio of a bank’s tier 1 capital to average total consolidated assets) for financial
institutions with assets of less than $10 billion. A “qualifying community bank” that exceeds this ratio will be deemed to be in compliance with all other capital and leverage requirements, including the capital requirements to be considered
“well capitalized” under Prompt Corrective Action statutes. The federal banking agencies have set the Community Bank Leverage Ratio at 9%. Actual and required capital amounts and ratios as of the dates indicated are presented below:
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Minimum Required to be
Well Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
December 31, 2024:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank Leverage Ratio
|
|
$
|
189,009
|
|
|
|
13.96
|
%
|
|
$
|
121,897
|
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
December 31, 2023:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank Leverage Ratio
|
|
$
|
185,773
|
|
|
|
14.97
|
%
|
|
$
|
111,696
|
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
At
December 31, 2024, the Company and the Bank met all the capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject. In addition, the Bank was “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. Management believes
that no conditions or events have occurred that would materially adversely change the Bank’s capital classifications. From time to time, we may need to raise additional capital to support the Bank’s further growth and to maintain the “well
capitalized” status.
Note 17 – Loan Commitments and Other Related Activities
Some financial instruments, such as loan commitments, credit lines, letters of credit, and overdraft protection, are issued to meet customer financing needs. These
are agreements to provide credit or to support the credit of others, as long as conditions established in the contract are met, and usually have expiration dates. Commitments may expire without being used. Off‑balance‑sheet risk for credit loss
exists up to the face amount of these instruments, although material losses are not anticipated. The same credit policies are used to make such commitments as are used for loans, including obtaining collateral at exercise of the commitment.
The contractual amounts of financial instruments with off‑balance‑sheet risk at year‑end were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Commitments to make loans
|
|
$
|
6,201
|
|
|
$
|
7,560
|
|
Unfunded construction loans
|
|
|
38,486 |
|
|
|
42,678 |
|
Unused lines of credit – variable rates
|
|
|
3,934
|
|
|
|
3,302
|
|
Commitments to make loans are generally made for periods of 60
days or less.
Note 18 – Parent Company Only Condensed Financial Information
Condensed financial information of Broadway Financial Corporation follows:
Condensed Balance Sheets
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
73,172
|
|
|
$
|
77,457
|
|
Investment in bank subsidiary
|
|
|
205,928
|
|
|
|
200,830
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
387
|
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Income
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
283
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income tax and undistributed subsidiary income
|
|
|
(705
|
)
|
|
|
(831
|
)
|
Income tax benefits
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
Equity in undistributed subsidiary income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,926
|
|
|
$
|
4,514
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed subsidiary income
|
|
|
(2,422
|
)
|
|
|
(5,149
|
)
|
Stock awards expenses
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
Change in other assets
|
|
|
(2,927
|
)
|
|
|
(1,618
|
)
|
Change in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital distribution to bank subsidiary
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share repurchase - FDIC
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(1,781 |
) |
Dividends declared and paid- ECIP
|
|
|
(1,567 |
) |
|
|
–
|
|
Increase in unreleased ESOP shares
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(3,400 |
) |
Proceeds from repayment of ESOP loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(4,285
|
)
|
|
|
(6,558
|
)
|
Beginning cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 19 – Earnings Per Common Share
The factors used in the earnings per common share computation follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
except share and per share)
|
|
Net income attributable to Broadway Financial Corporation
|
|
$
|
1,926
|
|
|
$
|
4,514
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to participating securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends - ECIP
|
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
|
– |
|
Income available to common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per common share
|
|
|
8,459,460
|
|
|
|
8,627,071
|
|
Add: Effects of unvested restricted stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted earnings per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share - basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share - diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings
per share for the year ended December 31, 2024 reflects preferred dividends of $0.18 per diluted common share.
Stock options for 12,500 and 31,250 shares of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, were not considered in computing diluted earnings per
common share because they were anti‑dilutive.
Basic earnings per share of common stock is computed pursuant to the two-class method by dividing net loss
available to common stockholders less dividends paid on participating securities (unvested shares of restricted common stock) and any undistributed loss attributable to participating securities by the weighted average common shares outstanding
during the period. The weighted average common shares outstanding includes the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding less the weighted average number of unvested shares of restricted common stock. ESOP shares are
considered outstanding for this calculation unless unearned. Diluted earnings per share of common stock includes the dilutive effect of unvested stock awards and additional potential common shares issuable under stock options. No unvested stock awards or potential common shares issuable under stock options were included in diluted earnings per share in either year.
Note 20 – Subsequent Events
The Company evaluated its December 31, 2024 consolidated financial statements for subsequent events through the date these financial statements were issued.
F-35