the Registration Statement;

the Base Indenture;

the Supplemental Indenture;

the global certificates representing the Securities, including the Guarantee;

the underwriting agreement, dated September 22, 2025 among Embraer the Company, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, SMBC Nikko Securities America, Inc., Commerz Markets LLC, Mizuho Securities USA LLC, MUFG Securities Americas Inc., Natixis Securities Americas LLC and UBS Securities LLC (the “Underwriting Agreement”);

the Preliminary Prospectus Supplement dated September 22, 2025, including the documents incorporated by reference therein;

the Prospectus Supplement, dated September 22, 2025, including the documents incorporated by reference therein;

the bylaws of Embraer as approved by the Special Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 17, 2024;

the minutes of the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of Embraer dated April 29, 2025 and Board of Directors´ Meeting held on September 1, 2025, which, among other matters, recorded the election of the current members of Embraer’s Board of Directors;

the minutes of the meeting of Embraer’s Board of Directors held on April 29, 2025, at which its current officers were appointed; and

the minutes of the meeting of Embraer’s Board of Directors held on September 1, 2025 at which the issuance of Securities was approved.

Embraer is a corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of Brazil;

each of the Base Indenture and the Supplemental Indenture has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by Embraer and, assuming due authorization,

the Guarantee has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by Embraer and, when the Notes are executed and authenticated as provided in the Indenture and delivered against payment therefor as provided in the Underwriting Agreement, the Guarantee will have been duly issued and will constitute a legal, valid and binding obligation of Embraer, enforceable against Embraer in accordance with its terms.

to ensure the enforceability or the admissibility in evidence of the Indenture, the Securities and any other document required by any Brazilian court to be furnished: (a) the signatures of the parties thereto and to any other document that may be deemed to be or become a part of such agreement, if executed outside Brazil, shall have been notarized by a local public notary and certified in the form established in the Hague Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalization for Foreign Public Documents of 5 October 1961; and (b) the document shall have been translated into Portuguese by a sworn translator, which signature must be notarized, and (c) the document jointly with the respective sworn translation shall have been registered with the appropriate registry of deeds and documents upon its due execution and delivery in accordance with the procedures above. Such translation and registration may be effected immediately prior to any such enforcement or presentation;

any judgment against Embraer in any of the non-Brazilian courts mentioned in the Indenture and the Securities arising out of or in relation to the obligations of Embraer under the Indenture and the Securities may be enforced in the courts of Brazil, without reconsideration of the merits, if previously confirmed by the Superior Court of Justice (Superior Tribunal de Justiça) of Brazil; and confirmation would be given if such judgment (a) is for a payment of a sum certain, (b) fulfills all formalities required for its enforceability under the laws of the country where it was issued, (c) was issued by a competent court after proper service of process on Embraer or after sufficient evidence of Embraer´s absence has been given, as required under applicable law, (d) is not subject to appeal, (e) was authenticated whether by the Brazilian Consulate or submitted to apostille (in accordance with Hague Convention) in the country in which it was issued and is accompanied by a translation into Portuguese by a certified sworn translator, which signature must be notarized by a notary public and (f) is not contrary to Brazilian national sovereignty, public policy or good morals. Notwithstanding, a preliminary order based on urgency may be enforced in the courts of Brazil, in accordance with the Article 962 of the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code;

in case of court proceedings filed against Embraer in Brazil, certain court costs and deposits to guarantee judgment might become due and any Brazilian or foreign plaintiff not resident in Brazil or who is abroad during the course of a legal proceeding will be required to make cash deposits as security for process costs and for third party attorney’s fees, should such plaintiff not have any real property in Brazil to assure payment thereof, in accordance with Article 83 of the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code, except in case of enforcement proceedings based on certain non-disputable documents as determined by the court, counterclaims and when it is expressly dismissed by an international agreement signed by Brazil, as established under Article 83, §1º, II and III of the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code;

in the event that any suit is brought against Embraer, service of process upon it, if made in Brazil (including, but not limited to, by means of registered or certified mail, postage prepaid), must be effected in accordance with Brazilian law;

any remittance of foreign currency by Embraer in order to fulfill any payment obligations under the Indenture and the Securities shall comply with Brazilian Central Bank regulations then in effect, provided, however, that the Brazilian Central Bank, under its authority to monitor the Brazilian foreign exchange market and the transactions carried out thereunder, determined that Brazilian banks shall take any and all acts deemed necessary for the analysis of the legality and legitimacy of such intended foreign exchange transactions and, therefore, the remittance of funds under the Indenture and the Securities shall be subject to the analysis and acceptance to be given by the Brazilian bank that would execute the relevant foreign exchange transaction;

certain payments in U.S. dollars by Embraer in connection with the Indenture or the Securities may be subject to Embraer obtaining the applicable authorization of the Central Bank of Brazil for remittance thereof;

any provisions of the Indenture and of the Securities providing that any specification or determination will be conclusive and binding will not be conclusive and binding if such calculation or determination is fraudulent and will not necessarily prevent judicial inquiry into the merits of any claim by an aggrieved party;

my opinion as to the binding effect and enforceability of the obligations of Embraer under the Indenture and the Securities is subject to all limitations arising from (a) bankruptcy, court-supervised corporate reorganization, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance, liquidation, reorganization, moratorium and other similar laws affecting the creditors’ rights generally; (b) possible unavailability of specific performance, summary judgment or injunctive relief (pursuant to the Law No. 13,105, dated March 16, 2015, as amended (“Brazilian Civil Procedure Code”)), and (c) concepts of materiality, reasonableness, good faith and fair dealing, such as contractual conditions, providing that a certain act or

the principles of Brazilian law that govern the nullity of the acts and obligations are considered principles of public policy and cannot be altered or waived by the parties thereto. Under Brazilian law, a guarantee is considered an accessory obligation to the underlying or principal obligation and Brazilian law establishes that the nullity of the principal obligation causes the nullity of the accessory obligation. Therefore, a judgment obtained in a court outside Brazil against a guarantor for enforcement of a guarantee in respect of obligations that have been considered null, may not be confirmed by the Superior Court of Justice of Brazil;

under Brazilian law, a person may not waive or relinquish its right to submit a claim to the courts or be deprived of its property without due process; therefore, any waivers by Embraer with respect to its respective rights and any waivers to assert a claim may not be enforced by a Brazilian court of law;

in accordance with Sections 832, 833 and 834 of the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code, certain properties, assets and revenues of Brazilian individuals are subject to immunity from, or restrictions to, suit, execution and attachment. Such properties, assets and revenues include, inter alia, assets that have restraints on their alienation, life insurance policies, the dwelling of the individual, certain personal property, small rural properties (provided that such property is the only one owned by the individual), salaries of civil servants and pension payments; and

any judgment obtained or enforced against Embraer in a Brazilian court of law by a non-Brazilian resident in respect of any sum payable by Embraer under the Indenture and the Securities will be expressed in Brazilian currency, equivalent to the applicable amount of United States dollars converted at the commercial exchange rate of the date on which such judgment is obtained or on the date of the lawsuit filing and updated according to the index indicated by the court until the effective payment date.